| Revision as of 22:36, 30 April 2008 editDarkspots (talk | contribs)6,346 edits adding categories of articles edited by the two users← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:54, 1 May 2008 edit undoSennen goroshi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,008 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| ;Comments | ;Comments | ||
| After looking a little more at the edits of the two accounts, I would have to agree. | |||
| Chessy seems to have taken over the work that SirIsaac was doing on the monkey-baiting article, defending the same sections in the same manner. | |||
| They both have made edits on articles relating to terrorism in Canada, Nazi books, Nazi architecture, Hunting/Fighting dog breeds, articles relating to firearms, articles relating to finance/accounting and they both refer to users who they have content disputes as vandals. | |||
| I have no details regarding IPs etc, however apart from a few slight differences, both users edit the same or very closely related articles - I would agree with the above, baiting dogs/fighting dogs, Nazi books, Nazi architecture, Canadian conflicts/terrorism and military firearms. | |||
| I would not care so much if Chessy was a sockpuppet of a banned user, if Chessy had been blocked, decided on a new start, and kept a low profile - acting in a way that is helpful. He does not, it is still the same aggressive editor, with a total arrogant lack of respect for others, their edits and consensus. ] (]) 03:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:54, 1 May 2008
User:SirIsaacBrock
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
SirIsaacBrock (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Chessy999 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Darkspots (talk) 19:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Evidence
Chessy999 has edited Monkey-baiting to defend the article in the form written by SirFozzieBrock:
Both users have edited the following (partial) list of articles:
They have both moved Bait (dogs), from some other article name to that article name. Chessy999: SirIsaacBrock:
Chessy999, SirIsaacBrock, and User:WritersCramp (a confirmed sock of SirIsaacBrock) have all edited Nazi architecture.
Chessy999 and SirIsaacBrock have both edited articles about accounting, infantry weapons, War of 1812 battles, fighting dogs (obviously), chess and specifically chess pieces (many for Chessy, for SirIsaacBrook), Nazism, and Canadian military history. The majority of the edits of each user fall into one of these categories of articles.
This is all too close for coincidence. SirIsaacBrock is banned by the community for disruptive behavior and rampant sockpuppetry (Misplaced Pages:List of banned users#SirIsaacBrock). Chessy999 has a lot of civility/tendentious editing complaints on his user talk page. This user should be indef blocked as the sockpuppet of a banned user.
- Comments
After looking a little more at the edits of the two accounts, I would have to agree.
Chessy seems to have taken over the work that SirIsaac was doing on the monkey-baiting article, defending the same sections in the same manner. They both have made edits on articles relating to terrorism in Canada, Nazi books, Nazi architecture, Hunting/Fighting dog breeds, articles relating to firearms, articles relating to finance/accounting and they both refer to users who they have content disputes as vandals.
I have no details regarding IPs etc, however apart from a few slight differences, both users edit the same or very closely related articles - I would agree with the above, baiting dogs/fighting dogs, Nazi books, Nazi architecture, Canadian conflicts/terrorism and military firearms.
I would not care so much if Chessy was a sockpuppet of a banned user, if Chessy had been blocked, decided on a new start, and kept a low profile - acting in a way that is helpful. He does not, it is still the same aggressive editor, with a total arrogant lack of respect for others, their edits and consensus. Sennen goroshi (talk) 03:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Conclusions