| Revision as of 11:23, 2 May 2008 editCult free world (talk | contribs)935 edits →The French Report← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:47, 2 May 2008 edit undoCult free world (talk | contribs)935 edits added contradictionNext edit → | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| == Good to see == | == Good to see == | ||
| Good the see the contradiction. :) --] (]) 11:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC) | Good the see the contradiction. :) --] (]) 11:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:47, 2 May 2008
Hi Sethie, I see you were being bold and went ahead and published this! Probably a good idea.
I've gone through and removed all primary sources except for two -- one linking to the bookstore as a source for the books and one linking to the school as the website to the school. Not sure if these should be deleted too?
Also, we need to come to agreement regarding the French report. The two sources are primary sources. I'm not sure if the sources in response to the French report (i.e., the United Nations investigation or the U.S. Commission investigation) count as primary or secondary. They seem to be primary because they are government reprots, according to the list Duty2love found on what counts as a primary source.
What do people think? Renee (talk) 19:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Nice work removing the items which don't meet wikipedia standards. I concur the French report is an issue.... Sethie (talk) 22:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that we need to be very very strict on only admitting secondary sources. Rest assured, I will have my eyes open for any violations on this front. Marathi_Mulgaa (talk) 08:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Primary Sources by different Disciplines
According to
Anthropology field notes, photographs, first published material of researchers
Art architectural model or drawing, building or structure, letter, motion picture, organizational records, painting, personal account, photograph, print, sculpture, sketch book
Biology field notes, research reports of field researchers, published experimental results or published research by those who conducted the experiment or research
Chemistry experimental notes, published experimental results or research reports by those who conducted the experiment or research, theoretical thesis
Economics company statistics, consumer survey, data series
Engineering map, geological survey, patent, schematic drawing, technical report
Government government report, interview, letter, news report, personal account, press release, public opinion survey, speech, treaty or international agreement
History artifact, diary, government report, interview, letter, map, news report, oral history, organizational records, photograph, speech, work of art
Law code, statute, court opinion, legislative report
Literature contemporary review, interview, letter, manuscript, personal account, published work
Music contemporary review, letter, personal account, score, sound recording
Philosophy seminal works by leading philosophers, e.g. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Bacon, Descartes, Hume, Kant, Hegel, Peirce, Wittgenstein, Sartre, Derrida, etc.
Physics experimental notes, published experimental results or research reports by those who conducted the experiment or research, theoretical thesis
Psychology case study, clinical case report, experimental replication, follow-up study, longitudinal study, treatment outcome study
Sociology cultural artifact, interview, oral history, organizational records, statistical data, survey Lafayette College Libraries & Academic Information Resources
The French Report
Personally I think it qualifies, though to put it in the lead I believe violates WP:LEAD. Thoughts? Sethie (talk) 22:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Good to see
Good the see the contradiction. :) --talk-to-me! (talk) 11:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC)