| Revision as of 16:17, 13 August 2005 editErwin Walsh (talk | contribs)497 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 03:48, 14 August 2005 edit undoA Man In Black (talk | contribs)38,430 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Get a life. No place in a serious encyclopedia. ] | Get a life. No place in a serious encyclopedia. ] | ||
| *'''Keep''' and ignore this troll, he has VFD a whole slew of material that should not be. Most being stubs that people were editing at the time. Walsh is currently reported for this behavior after refusing to stop. He just sits on new articles and VFDs them without any consideration. ''(Unsigned by ])'' | |||
| **'''Delete'''I was trying to keep up with Walsh posting VFD on new articles before he created too many flame wars. After reading and googling I agree the article is cruft and should be removed--] 17:41, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ***Do you want to strike your original vote with the <strike> tag, for clarity's sake? - ] (] | ]) 20:56, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Comment''': ] seems to be very "]". That doesn't make him wrong (since this article does not seem very useful or well written) but his nominations for deletion should be taken with a grain of salt. ] 17:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Irrespective of the nominator's credentials, this article is webcruft that should be '''delete'''d. ] 17:15, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete'''. This is in fact an instance of forumcruft and should be deleted; however, that does not excuse the personal attack in ]'s nomination. ] ]/] 17:21, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' nn forumcruft. -] 17:52, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' forumcruft, but come on. This isn't necessarily any geekier than, say, contributing to an online encyclopedia. - ] (] | ]) 20:54, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| **You have a point. Who are we kidding? Most non-Wikipedians would probably think we all need to get lives. -] ("<font color="#ba0000"><u>Sarah</u></font>") 02:30, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ***Heck, I'm a Wikipedian and I think we all need to get lives. ;) - ] (] | ]) 03:48, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete'''. -] ("<font color="#ba0000"><u>Sarah</u></font>") 02:30, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:48, 14 August 2005
Dark Lords Council
Get a life. No place in a serious encyclopedia. Erwin Walsh
- Keep and ignore this troll, he has VFD a whole slew of material that should not be. Most being stubs that people were editing at the time. Walsh is currently reported for this behavior after refusing to stop. He just sits on new articles and VFDs them without any consideration. (Unsigned by Gorgonzilla)
- DeleteI was trying to keep up with Walsh posting VFD on new articles before he created too many flame wars. After reading and googling I agree the article is cruft and should be removed--Gorgonzilla 17:41, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Do you want to strike your original vote with the <strike> tag, for clarity's sake? - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 20:56, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- DeleteI was trying to keep up with Walsh posting VFD on new articles before he created too many flame wars. After reading and googling I agree the article is cruft and should be removed--Gorgonzilla 17:41, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Erwin Walsh seems to be very "delete-happy". That doesn't make him wrong (since this article does not seem very useful or well written) but his nominations for deletion should be taken with a grain of salt. Explodicle 17:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Irrespective of the nominator's credentials, this article is webcruft that should be deleted. Martg76 17:15, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. This is in fact an instance of forumcruft and should be deleted; however, that does not excuse the personal attack in Erwin Walsh's nomination. Fernando Rizo T/C 17:21, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn forumcruft. -Splash 17:52, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete forumcruft, but come on. This isn't necessarily any geekier than, say, contributing to an online encyclopedia. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 20:54, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- You have a point. Who are we kidding? Most non-Wikipedians would probably think we all need to get lives. -Aranel ("Sarah") 02:30, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Heck, I'm a Wikipedian and I think we all need to get lives. ;) - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 03:48, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- You have a point. Who are we kidding? Most non-Wikipedians would probably think we all need to get lives. -Aranel ("Sarah") 02:30, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. -Aranel ("Sarah") 02:30, 14 August 2005 (UTC)