Revision as of 00:52, 8 August 2005 edit24.147.97.230 (talk) →Ted Kennedy: Thanks!!← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:27, 15 August 2005 edit undoRobert McClenon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers197,110 edits No Personal AttacksNext edit → | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
==Ted Kennedy Page== | ==Ted Kennedy Page== | ||
Can you help with the discussion on the Ted Kennedy page? Thanks ] | Can you help with the discussion on the Ted Kennedy page? Thanks ] | ||
== No Personal Attacks == | |||
Please do not refer to two editors who happen to agree that two particular Ted Kennedy incidents were non-encyclopedic as sock-puppets. That is a personal attack. ] 19:27, 15 August 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:27, 15 August 2005
I said "look up" as in "above". You will find the link in my previous comments. Derex 04:38, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
- (a) i have never met kizzle & i'm not his professor. i did work for one year at his university, while he was not even in attendance -- a coincidence we discovered by chance not long ago. (b) i'm not a sockpuppet, wolfman retired. a sockpuppet is using two accounts at once. on my user page you will see that i mention having a past name, and i have not made a secret of it (or you obviously wouldn't know about it). i did use wolfman once since derex: to vote in a vfd that required a minimum 100 edits; wolfman had about 6000. i am quite proud of my record as wolfman. i do note that you seem awfully damn knowledgeable about wikipedia details for such a newbie. you wouldn't be a sockpuppet yourself, now would you? (c) of course i checked to see what you were adding to other articles. the first thing i saw you do was say that tyson got convicted with mentioning the wee tiny detail that espy was acquitted of 30 charges. you are indeed a paragon of neutrality. btw, you followed me to the espy page. and i wrote the rape page in the first place. (d) kizzle should indeed mind his language, but you should also consider why you provoke such a reaction. you should mind your language too. (e) don't assume you know my politics. i'm not a democrat. but since SBVT, i have had a very low tolerance for smear campaigns and lies. i like to combat smear with fact. and that is what i have been doing. if you don't think i'm being neutral, then supply facts of your own. that is what i have been doing myself. i am happy to be educated. Derex 17:14, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
Musachachado
Responding to User talk:Casito#Vandal Musachachado:I am not an admin, so I can't block him. I added him to WP:VIP so he should be dealt with. I know several admins personally and I will contact them if need be. BTW, his German grammer is so bad that it's pitiful. -Casito⇝Talk 03:57, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Ted Kennedy
Thanks for your help. I've been trying to get a balance on this page for weeks now. 24.147.97.230 00:51, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thanks mr.sockpuppet
always nice to have a vandal target the clinton article, seeing how it isn't george bush there's vritually no chance of it being reverted - 172.150.56.37 01:49, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
no, you were warned--172.150.56.37 02:36, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
On Stalin
look, i appreciate removals of pro-Communist bias as much as the next guy -- I'm a registered U.S. Republican. however these guys are right that what Stalin did is not genocide by any definition of the word and you're really not helping your case on the talk page. i'd suggest you concede this one and try to make more objective edits on USSR-related articles where leftist bias actually is a significant problem.
i'm messaging you rather than just dismissing you because it is my opinion that several wik political articles do have a leftist bias, in some cases very egregious bias that goes untouched, and if you could focus on NPOV rather than political debates you'd gain more credibility on this project. J. Parker Stone 03:33, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
On Lenin (and Stalin)
I am asking for page protection. You may want to add your comments here . Ultramarine 21:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
Stalin
Hi Agiantman, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at Stalin and for incivility on the talk page. This is just to warn you that if you violate 3RR in future, you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Also, it's better to leave out the ad hominem comments when dealing with contentious issues. I've never been involved in editing this article, but I know it has caused a lot of trouble for various editors, so it's best to tread lightly and deal only with the content issues, and not with what you perceive to be the motives of other contributors. Cheers, SlimVirgin 00:20, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Spelling Error
question for user:Agiantman : the question is, are you sure your name isn't supposed to be spelled AgiantTroll? It is unclear if this is a mere spelling error, or a more serious misrepresentation, thanx -- Gee Wiz
Zoroastrianism
You may be interested in participating in this vote. KHM03 15:41, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
D.Right and NLP
Keep fighting the good fight. It's amazing how misinformed people can be. People are scared of the boogeyman, and lump together everything they don't understand. --Randal L. Schwartz 13:47, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
That was my point
!= means "does not equal" Glenford 14:38, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Ted Kennedy Page
Can you help with the discussion on the Ted Kennedy page? Thanks 24.147.97.230
No Personal Attacks
Please do not refer to two editors who happen to agree that two particular Ted Kennedy incidents were non-encyclopedic as sock-puppets. That is a personal attack. Robert McClenon 19:27, 15 August 2005 (UTC)