| Revision as of 23:27, 7 August 2005 editCGally81 (talk | contribs)258 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:32, 16 August 2005 edit undoShadow Hog (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,508 edits →Hey Wikifreaks... | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| == Well then... == | == Well then... == | ||
| Why don't you enhance it, eh?... ;) --] 09:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | Why don't you enhance it, eh?... ;) --] 09:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==YTMND deleted?== | |||
| What the hell happened to the real article on this site? For a site that manages to cleanse vandalism 24/7, I'm really surprised you guys let the entire deletion of an article go unsseen. | What the hell happened to the real article on this site? For a site that manages to cleanse vandalism 24/7, I'm really surprised you guys let the entire deletion of an article go unsseen. | ||
| ⚫ | :Much agreed. What happened to the extensive article on ytmnd.com? | ||
| ::Yeah, what happened to it? It was looking good. | |||
| :::It got deleted just because it had a VfD from, like, March, that had it deleted back then. ] if you so choose, though, if you don't have an account (and I know two of the unsigned comments above do, so no worries there), registering would help. I don't believe IP addresses count. --] 02:42, 8 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Hey Wikifreaks... == | |||
| ⚫ | Much agreed. What happened to the extensive article on ytmnd.com? | ||
| Stop shorting the article. It's very annoying. | |||
| :Right, well... | |||
| # What is "shorting"? "Shortening", you mean? Yeah, that would be annoying, but: | |||
| # You've looked at ], right? That's certainly not short, though the forums section needs trimming (not removal, just trimming); gettin' out of hand. --] 01:32, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:32, 16 August 2005
This page is way too short for such an awesome phenomenon.
Well then...
Why don't you enhance it, eh?... ;) --Vlad 09:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
YTMND deleted?
What the hell happened to the real article on this site? For a site that manages to cleanse vandalism 24/7, I'm really surprised you guys let the entire deletion of an article go unsseen.
- Much agreed. What happened to the extensive article on ytmnd.com?
- Yeah, what happened to it? It was looking good.
- It got deleted just because it had a VfD from, like, March, that had it deleted back then. Vote for its undeletion if you so choose, though, if you don't have an account (and I know two of the unsigned comments above do, so no worries there), registering would help. I don't believe IP addresses count. --Shadow Hog 02:42, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, what happened to it? It was looking good.
Hey Wikifreaks...
Stop shorting the article. It's very annoying.
- Right, well...
- What is "shorting"? "Shortening", you mean? Yeah, that would be annoying, but:
- You've looked at YTMND, right? That's certainly not short, though the forums section needs trimming (not removal, just trimming); gettin' out of hand. --Shadow Hog 01:32, 16 August 2005 (UTC)