Misplaced Pages

Talk:Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:53, 14 May 2008 editGreg park avenue (talk | contribs)1,340 editsm Disruptive activity by User:Boodlesthecat← Previous edit Revision as of 18:04, 14 May 2008 edit undoBoodlesthecat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,411 edits Disruptive activity by User:Boodlesthecat / reason for POV: huh?Next edit →
Line 18: Line 18:


I am too old to be provoked to take part in edit war, so I prefer to state my reasons rather over here - regarding disruptive activity of an user ] who didn't contributed to this article nothing new or of essence but non-essentials regarding for example heritage of a newspaper editor while removing consistently scholar sources. See - his last edition. Prof. ] represents here nothing else but newspaper policy, in this case ], or maybe his views as novelist or observations as private citizen, not any academic institution. According to WP guidelines in respect to notability, the scholar sources outweigh newspaper editorials, so why remove ] official site in the form of above mentioned ] report, which contains much more info than present reference, and replace it by some local paper editorial written by the person with an obvious grudge against Poland. The idea of the application of ] has long time ago been abandoned since ] even in retrospect to Germany, now someone wants to sell it again in retrospect to Poland for some reason or other. ''Fear'' is already cheap propaganda shot - so far acknowledged only by media policy and Gross' employer. So why someone tries to hide it, afraid of truth? Misplaced Pages is not a place to peddle anti-semitism in places where currently there is none. ] (]) 17:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC) I am too old to be provoked to take part in edit war, so I prefer to state my reasons rather over here - regarding disruptive activity of an user ] who didn't contributed to this article nothing new or of essence but non-essentials regarding for example heritage of a newspaper editor while removing consistently scholar sources. See - his last edition. Prof. ] represents here nothing else but newspaper policy, in this case ], or maybe his views as novelist or observations as private citizen, not any academic institution. According to WP guidelines in respect to notability, the scholar sources outweigh newspaper editorials, so why remove ] official site in the form of above mentioned ] report, which contains much more info than present reference, and replace it by some local paper editorial written by the person with an obvious grudge against Poland. The idea of the application of ] has long time ago been abandoned since ] even in retrospect to Germany, now someone wants to sell it again in retrospect to Poland for some reason or other. ''Fear'' is already cheap propaganda shot - so far acknowledged only by media policy and Gross' employer. So why someone tries to hide it, afraid of truth? Misplaced Pages is not a place to peddle anti-semitism in places where currently there is none. ] (]) 17:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
: I don't understand the bulk of your rambling post, not do I appreciate your accusations of "disruption." In any case, the source of the quote was the LA Times, and that is what is sourced. There is no need to put a needless link to Pricneton University. I have no idea what is "disruptive" or "POV" about that. Please refrain from such accusations. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 18:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:04, 14 May 2008

A fact from Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 May 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Misplaced Pages:Recent additions/2008/May.
Misplaced Pages

I will be back to completer this page. Elan26

I strongly recommend against a chapter by chapter synopsis. Have a look at some other book articles for a more appropriate structure. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thank you. Elan26 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elan26 (talkcontribs) 01:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Polish edition

The Polish edition has been changed, I don't know how much.Xx236 (talk) 13:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

is a nation cursed by absence

What is the reason to quote any POV by anyone?Xx236 (talk) 11:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Disruptive activity by User:Boodlesthecat / reason for POV

I am too old to be provoked to take part in edit war, so I prefer to state my reasons rather over here - regarding disruptive activity of an user User:Boodlesthecat who didn't contributed to this article nothing new or of essence but non-essentials regarding for example heritage of a newspaper editor while removing consistently scholar sources. See this - his last edition. Prof. Thane Rosenbaum represents here nothing else but newspaper policy, in this case Los Angeles Times, or maybe his views as novelist or observations as private citizen, not any academic institution. According to WP guidelines in respect to notability, the scholar sources outweigh newspaper editorials, so why remove Princeton University official site in the form of above mentioned Princeton University Press report, which contains much more info than present reference, and replace it by some local paper editorial written by the person with an obvious grudge against Poland. The idea of the application of collective guilt has long time ago been abandoned since Sonderweg even in retrospect to Germany, now someone wants to sell it again in retrospect to Poland for some reason or other. Fear is already cheap propaganda shot - so far acknowledged only by media policy and Gross' employer. So why someone tries to hide it, afraid of truth? Misplaced Pages is not a place to peddle anti-semitism in places where currently there is none. greg park avenue (talk) 17:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand the bulk of your rambling post, not do I appreciate your accusations of "disruption." In any case, the source of the quote was the LA Times, and that is what is sourced. There is no need to put a needless link to Pricneton University. I have no idea what is "disruptive" or "POV" about that. Please refrain from such accusations. Boodlesthecat 18:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Category: