Misplaced Pages

User talk:GoneAwayNowAndRetired: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:39, 17 May 2008 editGoneAwayNowAndRetired (talk | contribs)14,896 edits Blanked the page← Previous edit Revision as of 18:34, 18 May 2008 edit undoGoneAwayNowAndRetired (talk | contribs)14,896 edits unblock requestNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock|Its long, and below. It looked funny and wrong because of its lenght in the unblock template, so I'm just using that template to get eyes on it.}}

==Unblock request==
(I sort of prefer to post this in public, rather than mailing it, for community feedback)

If possible, I'd like to be considered for an unblock. I was banned indefinitely on ] by the Arbitration Committee, one of only I think two indefinite blocks by them. I got into a series of stupid rolling conflicts with MONGO, which ended in that, which I should have far, far earlier just let it go. I then socked ], and Jimbo Wales and Fred Bauder both incredibly graciously granted me a RTV afterwards. I honestly swear that all the other supposed "me" socks afterwards that randomly trolled MONGO and Hipocrite weren't me. I disagree with a lot of what happens sometimes here, for what little it is worth, but I wouldn't piss away a Right to Vanish granted at such a high level.

Yes, I've been active on Misplaced Pages Review in spurts (but aside from occassionally losing my temper there, I like to think I've been squarely in the "Misplaced Pages can be fixed category"). Yes, I started early last year the stupid Wikiabuse site idea, which was co-opted and ruined by a variety of outside influences. That idea is long terminated, the MySQL database deleted, and the domain name will go up for whomever wants to buy it when it expires.

I decided to ask for this consideration after becoming aware of ], but it has nothing to do with it--no opinion on it, and I want nothing to do with it. On a lark I began working on ] afterwards, and remembered how much I enjoyed it. I have no desire to delve into the 9/11 related nonsense again or anything in any way, shape, or form to do with MONGO ever again. What I would like is to be able to freely work on some articles when I have time.

My article interests are I guess a fairly odd collection, and I imagine that is how my previous sock account from 2006 was found: Seattle, Connecticut, Linux, animation, photography, bluegrass bands, comic books. That's what I'd like to work on, if I had the chance again. Probably 1/4 of my previous contributions ({{user|Rootology}}) were tagging city and municipality articles with whatever their missing <nowiki>{{state}}</nowiki> tag they needed. I'd be curious to build a bot that can do this, if I were allowed back, since I (hope) I have the technical skill to operate a useful bot. I’d also like to work on Commons to bring in images from free-to-reuse sources and populating them through English Misplaced Pages. That is what I'd like to work on, given the chance to return. I have zero interest in any sort of political nonsense or power games. I just want to be able to work on stuff that I enjoy reading about.

If my return would require any sort of sanction or probation, or restriction, that is perfectly fine and I wouldn’t even try to object or lawyer it. If someone suggests any sort of Misplaced Pages space limit, please let me just do Featured Articles, AIV reports, and all that stuff.

I just want to apologize again for my role in the stupid problems with the ED article, and for the personal attacks I lobbed like grenades in my final week—I’d apologized previously on Misplaced Pages Review, and want to do so again here. I am sorry, and thanks for any possible consideration.

If someone could copy this over to RFAR, reply here, or however it should be done, I’d appreciate it. <font color="#156917">]</font> (<font color="#156917">]</font>) 18:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:34, 18 May 2008

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

GoneAwayNowAndRetired (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Its long, and below. It looked funny and wrong because of its lenght in the unblock template, so I'm just using that template to get eyes on it.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Its long, and below. It looked funny and wrong because of its lenght in the unblock template, so I'm just using that template to get eyes on it. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Its long, and below. It looked funny and wrong because of its lenght in the unblock template, so I'm just using that template to get eyes on it. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Its long, and below. It looked funny and wrong because of its lenght in the unblock template, so I'm just using that template to get eyes on it. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Unblock request

(I sort of prefer to post this in public, rather than mailing it, for community feedback)

If possible, I'd like to be considered for an unblock. I was banned indefinitely on October 2006 by the Arbitration Committee, one of only I think two indefinite blocks by them. I got into a series of stupid rolling conflicts with MONGO, which ended in that, which I should have far, far earlier just let it go. I then socked afterwards, and Jimbo Wales and Fred Bauder both incredibly graciously granted me a RTV afterwards. I honestly swear that all the other supposed "me" socks afterwards that randomly trolled MONGO and Hipocrite weren't me. I disagree with a lot of what happens sometimes here, for what little it is worth, but I wouldn't piss away a Right to Vanish granted at such a high level.

Yes, I've been active on Misplaced Pages Review in spurts (but aside from occassionally losing my temper there, I like to think I've been squarely in the "Misplaced Pages can be fixed category"). Yes, I started early last year the stupid Wikiabuse site idea, which was co-opted and ruined by a variety of outside influences. That idea is long terminated, the MySQL database deleted, and the domain name will go up for whomever wants to buy it when it expires.

I decided to ask for this consideration after becoming aware of the current ED AFD, but it has nothing to do with it--no opinion on it, and I want nothing to do with it. On a lark I began working on Commons on my inactive account there afterwards, and remembered how much I enjoyed it. I have no desire to delve into the 9/11 related nonsense again or anything in any way, shape, or form to do with MONGO ever again. What I would like is to be able to freely work on some articles when I have time.

My article interests are I guess a fairly odd collection, and I imagine that is how my previous sock account from 2006 was found: Seattle, Connecticut, Linux, animation, photography, bluegrass bands, comic books. That's what I'd like to work on, if I had the chance again. Probably 1/4 of my previous contributions (Rootology (talk · contribs)) were tagging city and municipality articles with whatever their missing {{state}} tag they needed. I'd be curious to build a bot that can do this, if I were allowed back, since I (hope) I have the technical skill to operate a useful bot. I’d also like to work on Commons to bring in images from free-to-reuse sources and populating them through English Misplaced Pages. That is what I'd like to work on, given the chance to return. I have zero interest in any sort of political nonsense or power games. I just want to be able to work on stuff that I enjoy reading about.

If my return would require any sort of sanction or probation, or restriction, that is perfectly fine and I wouldn’t even try to object or lawyer it. If someone suggests any sort of Misplaced Pages space limit, please let me just do Featured Articles, AIV reports, and all that stuff.

I just want to apologize again for my role in the stupid problems with the ED article, and for the personal attacks I lobbed like grenades in my final week—I’d apologized previously on Misplaced Pages Review, and want to do so again here. I am sorry, and thanks for any possible consideration.

If someone could copy this over to RFAR, reply here, or however it should be done, I’d appreciate it. rootology (T) 18:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Category: