User talk:Synergy: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 20:29, 18 May 2008 editSynergy (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,794 edits →BTW: good grief← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:47, 19 May 2008 edit undoTkgd2007 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,163 edits RFANext edit →
Line 57:		Line 57:
	For future reference, it's not "knit pick", it's nitpick. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)		For future reference, it's not "knit pick", it's nitpick. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
	:Of course it is. What I was thinking when I typed that was beyond me. ;p ] (]) 20:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)		:Of course it is. What I was thinking when I typed that was beyond me. ;p ] (]) 20:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

			==Admin request==
			Revoke it. I'll be back in a few months with more edits under my belt :D. Thanks a lot for the notification, and I agree with everyone. I will continue contributing, and contribute more to the Misplaced Pages namespace in the future. Thanks, and feel free to remove the RFA. Cheers! -- <sub><span style="border:1px solid #aaa;padding-left:4px;padding-right:4px;back:#000;white-space: nowrap;"><font face="Calibri">]\|]</font></span></sub> 02:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:47, 19 May 2008

Template:Werdnabot

The Status Bot has been blocked.
See my last edit here.

I am currently: User:SynergeticMaggot/Status

Please read first

I don't respond to conversation in archive. Please make a new header.
I may respond on your talk page instead of mine.
If I respond on yours, it's watchlisted. When the conversation is over, it is no longer.
If your here to discuss one of my closures at any XfD perhaps you would look at this first.
Likewise see here for my closures of RfA related closures.
RfA thankspam is welcome here, while others may not think so.

WP:HAU

Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 04:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Not again! Revamping is a norm for this page. I think we need a new group of editors who are higly active on revamping the highly active users related article. :) SynergeticMaggot (talk) 04:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Thanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I hope you find I live up to your expectations. Best, Risker (talk) 16:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:Requests for adminship/Qaddosh

Thank you so much for your feedback. I may close it not only per WP:SNOW, but also per editcountitis. In the real world, it is considered better to listen often than to talk often. If only Misplaced Pages were similar. At least I know now what my weaknesses are and I can work on them. Thank you so much for your kind words. -- Qaddosh||contribs 20:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Could you please close it for me per WP:SNOW. This is a bit disheartening, since I see editors with less experience than me becoming admins, but all is still well. It allows me to work on my weaknesses. I may be taking a wikibreak for a bit. I think I needed one before the RFA. Thank you so much for your assistance. -- Qaddosh||contribs 20:10, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you so much. -- Qaddosh||contribs 20:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Wirt H. Wills

OK, article saved. But it still needs some work, particularly wikification. It probably can be trimmed down a bit, too. Let me know if I can help. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Good start. Still needs the for the tone to be a little more formal. My Wiki-time is likely going to be a bit limited over the next couple of weeks (new computer and DV camera! yay!), but I'll do what I can. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Hah, no problem. And again, thanks. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 03:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

RfA thank-spam

Synergy, just a note of appreciation for your recent support of my request for adminship, which ended successfully with 112 supports, 2 opposes, and 1 neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. Many thanks! Gatoclass (talk) 06:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks!

		RfA: Many thanks
		Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 06:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Lectures

Todays lecture is starting! The topic is "How source experts judge source reliability" and the speaker is DGG. The meeting location for setup is #wikipedia-en-lectures on irc.freenode.net. The lecture will be given over skype. Contact Filll2 or kim_bruning to be invited to the lecture chat also.

--Kim Bruning (talk) 15:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

BTW

For future reference, it's not "knit pick", it's nitpick. Jim62sch 18:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Of course it is. What I was thinking when I typed that was beyond me. ;p SynergeticMaggot (talk) 20:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Admin request

Revoke it. I'll be back in a few months with more edits under my belt :D. Thanks a lot for the notification, and I agree with everyone. I will continue contributing, and contribute more to the Misplaced Pages namespace in the future. Thanks, and feel free to remove the RFA. Cheers! -- _{TIM KLOSKE|TALK} 02:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)