Misplaced Pages

:Featured article candidates/Chocolate/archive2: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:07, 31 August 2007 editGimmeBot (talk | contribs)Bots75,273 editsm GimmeBot clearing redirect page← Previous edit Revision as of 01:22, 20 May 2008 edit undoLimetolime (talk | contribs)6,988 edits Nom.Next edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


] ]

Well, this nomination is pretty different than what I'm used to nominating. The article was nominated back in August 2007, but failed. Since then it became a ], but was delisted because it wasn't referenced enough. I added references, deleted unsourced statements, added a popular culture section, and fixed the "further reading" section. I think the article is pretty good, and can very well become a featured article. ''']''' ] <sup>•</sup> ] 01:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:22, 20 May 2008

Chocolate

previous FAC

Well, this nomination is pretty different than what I'm used to nominating. The article was nominated back in August 2007, but failed. Since then it became a good article, but was delisted because it wasn't referenced enough. I added references, deleted unsourced statements, added a popular culture section, and fixed the "further reading" section. I think the article is pretty good, and can very well become a featured article. Limetolime 01:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)