| Revision as of 23:03, 25 May 2008 editDtobias (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers12,883 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:13, 25 May 2008 edit undoJohn Vandenberg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users68,507 edits stop this nonsenseNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ::Irrelevant. ] requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal. | ::Irrelevant. ] requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal. | ||
| :::You're trying to make a ], aren't you? I'm not positive ''what'' point, but you seem to be making one. ] (]) 23:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | :::You're trying to make a ], aren't you? I'm not positive ''what'' point, but you seem to be making one. ] (]) 23:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::Obviously not irrelevant :- Two separate editors have reverted you so if you wish to continue this campaign, please do so by initiating discussion at ], or raise your concerns with myself (the case clerk) either ] or on my ]. Rather than protect the Evidence page as , I will block this IP if the disruption continues. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 23:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:13, 25 May 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV/Evidence, you will be blocked from editing. Ashton1983 (talk) 15:59, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- That's an interesting point, but if we started applying WP:BLP to the free discussion of editor's behavior, we'd get nothing else done. -- Kendrick7 17:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. WP:BLP requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal.
- You're trying to make a WP:POINT, aren't you? I'm not positive what point, but you seem to be making one. *Dan T.* (talk) 23:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Obviously not irrelevant :- Two separate editors have reverted you so if you wish to continue this campaign, please do so by initiating discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV/Evidence, or raise your concerns with myself (the case clerk) either privately or on my Jayvdb. Rather than protect the Evidence page as requested, I will block this IP if the disruption continues. John Vandenberg 23:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. WP:BLP requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal.