Misplaced Pages

Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper. — Robert Frost

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18

Stormfront and wikipedia.

See this thread Homey 22:20, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

BTW, I think congratulations are in order. (From the aforementioned thread):

Re: Zionist Cabal taking over Misplaced Pages

Misplaced Pages Intelligence Report #001

The following is an incomplete list of those suspected to be members of, or to be the "useful idiots" of, the so-called "Elders of Misplaced Pages" (the Zionist cabal which has Misplaced Pages in its grip). Those at the top of the list are definite members and are the most ruthless and vicious of the bunch; those at the bottom I'm less sure about. Monitor the activities of the first 5 on the list (watch their user contribution pages and their user talk pages) and you'll have a good idea of what the entire gang is up to.

The suspected "Elders of Misplaced Pages" are:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Jayjg

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Jfdwolff

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:RK

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Gzuckier

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:IZAK

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Eliezer

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:TShilo12

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Max_rspct

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Ezra_Wax

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:MathKnight

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Leifern

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Humus_sapiens

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Fintor

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Kuratowski's_Ghost

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:PhatJew

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:RachelBrown

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:SlimVirgin

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Jpgordon

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Jdavidb

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Themindset

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Robert_McClenon

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:RyanFreisling

Homey 22:26, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Two things.

One, that you blocked User:Coqsportif warrants an unspoken barnstar for protecting Wikipeida from those using it as a playground. Two, do the the bluebonnets on your User page indicate your being a Texan, or is it just a pretty photo? Shem 22:53, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

1948 Arab-Israeli War

Please dont blanket revert without seeing Talk page first. 62.252.0.7 10:03, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Arbitration notice

Notice posted here. Rangerdude 18:58, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

different Arbitration

I have put DreamGuy up for arbitratioon for incivillity. addevidance at your convieniance, or just repair my formatting if it suits youGavin the Chosen 02:34, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

by the way, cute puppy on the picture here, is it yours?Gavin the Chosen 02:34, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Compliment

You're hypercool. You make me want to be a better person. Thanks  :) --noösfractal 03:47, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

user hipocrite

is it possible to explain to that user that being polite is kind of paramount, and ordering other people around is not assuming good faith or polite in any way? i am growing impatient with that users lack of decorum.Gavin the Chosen 04:00, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Just putting in my two cents here, but I can't see where Hipocrite has been impolite with you. I think he's been very patient and polite. It might be helpful if you pointed out some edits that you took offence at? Vashti 09:24, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

FOC

It's been a long time but he's back. Judging from the amount of crap he spews we ALL have a good idea that he's not editing in good faith, so I'm wondering if I can simply treat all his edits as vandalisms (since they've been systematically disproven) an revert them on the spot. It's very difficult to work within the 3RR system while he games it by using anon IPs. -Hmib 05:57, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

RE:3RR

My first edit at 20:19, 20 August 2005 was not a revert. I deleted the personal attack against Ishihara which got mixed in to the bigger conflict, which was the sangokujin and apology statement issue.

My reverts from there on were to that version, without the personal attack on Ishihara.

If you look my my contribs, or the history page on Ishihara, my edits on that article were, from latest to earliest,

• 12:31, 21 August 2005
• 00:12, 21 August 2005
• 22:48, 20 August 2005
• 20:19, 20 August 2005 (which was an edit, not a revert)

not what FoC had on the complaint page.

FoC wanted to redefine sangokujin using his version of the word, which is not found on the actual page on sangokujin on wikipedia. Also, he added that Ishihara apologised, without providing any proof whatsoever that he did. -Hmib 20:33, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

In this version made on 17 Aug I overlooked the POV in that sentence. I corrected that in the first edit that FoC accuse me of making which is on 20:19, 20 August 2005, meaning wasn't a revert but an edit. Following that there were 3 reverts by me, a total of 3 reverts. 3RR was not violated. I did not write that statement, an anon IP did, which I did not see and overlooked because at the same time FoC was adding his own POV to it. In none of the 4 edits FoC accused me of making were that POV sentence present. -Hmib 21:16, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

In all edits tried to add that Ishihara said he respected French culture, of which there is no evidence of. See one of his edits here. -Hmib 21:16, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

SlimVirgin, don't believe Hmib. I have never said or written or spoken that Ishihara apologised anything. For "sangokujin," his edit is completely wrong. I looked up a Japanese dictionary that is the same explanation of mine. He cannot speak Japanese so I'm wondering where dis he get that idea from. I don't know because he has never cited his source. Also, I told Hmib that his edition is insulting and unencyclopedic but he does not listen anything. Flowerofchivalry 21:09, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your valuable comment. All of my edits are based on credible sources, but I will try to cite the sources more clearly than before. The edition you quoted above is based on here. This page is in Japanese but this website is the first source because they write down everything he said on press release.

His reverts violates 3RR as I showed. I would like to ask you to take appropriate action. Flowerofchivalry 22:04, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

I fixed the problem. I hope it works... If there is any problem, please let me know.

--Flowerofchivalry 22:26, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Celebration!

Please join me in celebrating my 1000th edit at Misplaced Pages, the most important online information resource! Hamster Sandwich 21:46, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence

Why did you go in and restore the link to a section of an article that was a fork file for an already existing article? Once they go to that one it just says there to go to the other one for more info, so it ends up being a wasted link. DreamGuy 22:31, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

You wanted one link and he wanted the other, so I inserted both. The articles do seem to have different content, and a see also isn't worth edit-warring over. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:34, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

You are just encouraging him in making a fork section instead of working on the main article. I just put a merge notice in, but I expect it will probably go uncommented upon as the conversation I tried to start up there weeks back went unreplied to. DreamGuy 22:36, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

• sigh*. He never stops. He renames an article, then complains because it is referred to elsewhere by the old name. He tries to delete a link and when that is stopped tries to get different articles on different topics merged!!! (And doesn't even bother to put the merge notice in!!!) Oh well. Thanks for putting in the right links to the article. Both are relevant. Both deal with the topic. One deals in detail with one allegation. The other covers all the allegations against Albert Victor in a larger piece on urban myths and royalty. FearÉIREANN\ 23:21, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

No... the problem here is that you never stop... you created a duplicate section in an article you made without checking to see if other articles already existed. You insisted upon linking your version as the supposed "main article". You gave the article an inaccurate title. You didn;t respond to talk page comments placed there a long time ago. You didn't check to make sure that the link was still accurate. And you still don;t understand that "urban myths" is not a real phrase. And you do all this without trying to discuss the issue at all, just blindly reverting things back to your way, making false accusations, failing to read the edit comments, and then complaining as if you were the one bein put upon. If you had simply read the comments on your article talk page, or the edit comments, or made talk page comments of your own, you could have avoided this. You didn't... and after all that you filed a false 3RR charge. So please stop your bellyaching, learn how to work with other editors, read up on policies and learn to follow them. DreamGuy 01:15, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

FoC, again and again

Hi Slim, I just wanted to thank you for your patience with FoC. Even though there really is no point in listening to anything he says you went beyond your call of duty and tried to resolve conflicts. Though given the extremist agenda FoC wants to push onto wikipedia, I'm afraid your patience would wear thin too, sooner or later. Well, just saying you have my thanks. -Hmib 22:44, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Coqsportif

Two new accounts, User:Jakemelen and User:Toshiba, seem to have appeared where Coqsportif left off (Michael Dutton Douglas and Self-hatred). Only speculation, of course. Shem 23:53, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Vandal

Black Scorpion (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) See contribs --Kim Nevelsteen 00:25, 22 August 2005 (UTC)