| Revision as of 23:53, 27 May 2008 editBalloonman (talk | contribs)25,417 edits →Discussion: do not support until live← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:46, 28 May 2008 edit undoXeno (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators103,385 edits →Xenocidic: humbly accepting nomination and answering questionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Xenocidic has been active on Misplaced Pages for about five and a half months. He is active in a number of "adminly" areas wherein he has participated in not only the wikispace, but also the wiki talk space. He participates in discussions on not only user talk, but also article talk. In short, this is one of the more well rounded candidates I've seen (well, if you exclude the fact that he only writes about video games!) I've spent about 12 hours scrutinizing this candidates edits trying to find some reason to justify forcing him to wait even two weeks, and I can't. 12 hours.... that's 3 times longer than any of my past candidates! I keep coming back to one thing, he's ready now.] (]) 23:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | Xenocidic has been active on Misplaced Pages for about five and a half months. He is active in a number of "adminly" areas wherein he has participated in not only the wikispace, but also the wiki talk space. He participates in discussions on not only user talk, but also article talk. In short, this is one of the more well rounded candidates I've seen (well, if you exclude the fact that he only writes about video games!) I've spent about 12 hours scrutinizing this candidates edits trying to find some reason to justify forcing him to wait even two weeks, and I can't. 12 hours.... that's 3 times longer than any of my past candidates! I keep coming back to one thing, he's ready now.] (]) 23:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:'' | :''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:'' I humbly accept, and thank my would-be coach for his kind words. ] (]) 00:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| <!--The candidate may make an optional statement here--> | <!--The candidate may make an optional statement here--> | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants: | Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants: | ||
| :'''1.''' What admin work do you intend to take part in? | :'''1.''' What admin work do you intend to take part in? | ||
| ::'''A:''' At first, I will likely stick to what I know best, blocking persistent vandals reported at ], ] that are being routinely vandalized, and ] that clearly meet CSD criteria. I would also be adding myself to ] as it is my opinion that contributors should be granted the ability to take their work elsewhere or improve upon it such that it meets inclusion criteria. After completing ], I would branch out and help with ]. I would, of course, continue to assist other users with any questions they may have as well as do my best to defuse conflicts between users. | |||
| ::'''A:''' | |||
| :'''2.''' What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why? | :'''2.''' What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why? | ||
| ::'''A:''' A lot of my work is somewhat behind the scenes and ] (copy-editing and such), but I think the most visible would be the major cleanups I completed on ] and ] (the latter still needs work but I saved it from a 'blatant advertising' CSD tag as the initial contributor had a ], but I felt the article satisfied ]). I also completed a ] of ], in particular helped to reduce the backlog of ] from over 120 down to zero (this is starting to grow again, will have to do another adopter tree-shaking run). I do create articles whenever I'm the first on the scene with breaking news, as with ]. I'm also particularly pleased with two of the templates I designed - {{tl|Truestatus}} & {{tl|Statustop}} - which are used to effectively customize StatusBot and visually display said status, and allow other users to easily do so as well (for the latter I must credit ] for the visual design). An overview of my contributions can be found at ]. Lastly, I feel the ] has been helpful - for my adoptees and myself - as it has prompted me to expand my horizons. | |||
| ::'''A:''' | |||
| :'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? | :'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? | ||
| ::'''A:''' On the subject of stress, a user category I created was nominated and successfully deleted. During ] I became somewhat defensive. Looking back, I now see why it was not a worthwhile or useful category. I've been involved in a couple conflicts, but most of the time I try to resolve it with talk page resolutions, either directly with the editor, or on the talk page of the article. In the past, it may seem like I let my preference for the Xbox 360 somewhat colour my contributions as with the ]. It was my opinion that the order listed by the press release should be used, others thought this was to preference the Xbox 360 (we've since reached a consensus to order the platforms by chronological-then-alphabetical order). Conflicts like this I've take to the ] for a wider range of opinions. Lately I've been steering clear of these conflicts altogether because they often tend towards ] anyway. I've since been approaching such issues with neutrality in mind. On the subject of lamest edit wars, I've tried my best ] and ] to try and act as a facilitator to resolve the "Niko's nationality" debate listed at lamest edit wars, as I am a disinterested party. | |||
| ::'''A:''' | |||
| ====General comments==== | ====General comments==== | ||
| {{#ifeq:Xenocidic|Xenocidic||<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">RfAs for this user:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Xenocidic}}</ul></div>}} | {{#ifeq:Xenocidic|Xenocidic||<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">RfAs for this user:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Xenocidic}}</ul></div>}} | ||
| Line 39: | Line 38: | ||
| =====Support===== | =====Support===== | ||
| # | |||
| #<!-- Please do not support until the RfA has gone live. --> | |||
| =====Oppose===== | =====Oppose===== | ||
Revision as of 00:46, 28 May 2008
Xenocidic
Voice your opinion (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 23:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Xenocidic (talk · contribs) - This is one of the hardest RfA's that I've ever written, not because Xenocidic isn't deserving, but rather because I am being very hypocritical for writing it. You see, Xenocidic has not been actively editing for six months which is normally my criteria, but he's only a few weeks away from that magical six month mark. I thought about asking him to wait 2 weeks to run, that way I could say that he'd been active for six months, but I'm not sure what he might learn in two weeks that he doesn't already know. And it's not fair to him to force him to wait when he's ready now.
I even thought about serving as his admin coach---a program that I believe in---to get him past that six month mark. But to do so would be even more hypocritical than nominating him a few weeks early. Admin coaching, IMHO is not a means to polish one's resume, but rather a means to help somebody who needs some guidance. I've said elsewhere that I'd rather have a candidate that needs a lot of help, than the one who is all but ready to run. To me, coaching is a means to help guide a person to learn more about Misplaced Pages. It should not be something somebody does to get a check by their name---in fact, for some candidates coaching is, IMHO, a detriment. Xenocidic is one of those candidates.
I was going to coach Xenocidic because he approached me a few weeks ago about the possibility of coaching him. At the time I told him I was too busy, but I decided to take a look at his edits and comment on his editor review. My initial impression was very positive. This impression was heightened by others who echoed my sentiment. Several RfA regulars (Useight and Rudget) commented on his editor review that they thought he was about ready for adminship. I agree. As an Admin Coach, I honestly don't know what I could have him do that would be meaningful that he hasn't already done! I could run him through some busy work, but that isn’t fair to him or the process.
Xenocidic has been active on Misplaced Pages for about five and a half months. He is active in a number of "adminly" areas wherein he has participated in not only the wikispace, but also the wiki talk space. He participates in discussions on not only user talk, but also article talk. In short, this is one of the more well rounded candidates I've seen (well, if you exclude the fact that he only writes about video games!) I've spent about 12 hours scrutinizing this candidates edits trying to find some reason to justify forcing him to wait even two weeks, and I can't. 12 hours.... that's 3 times longer than any of my past candidates! I keep coming back to one thing, he's ready now.Balloonman (talk) 23:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I humbly accept, and thank my would-be coach for his kind words. xenocidic (talk) 00:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A: At first, I will likely stick to what I know best, blocking persistent vandals reported at AIV, protecting pages that are being routinely vandalized, and deleting pages that clearly meet CSD criteria. I would also be adding myself to Category:Misplaced Pages administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles as it is my opinion that contributors should be granted the ability to take their work elsewhere or improve upon it such that it meets inclusion criteria. After completing Admin school, I would branch out and help with administrative backlog. I would, of course, continue to assist other users with any questions they may have as well as do my best to defuse conflicts between users.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why?
- A: A lot of my work is somewhat behind the scenes and wiki-gnomish (copy-editing and such), but I think the most visible would be the major cleanups I completed on Realtime Worlds and WeMix.com (the latter still needs work but I saved it from a 'blatant advertising' CSD tag as the initial contributor had a conflict of interests, but I felt the article satisfied notability criteria). I also completed a major overhaul of Adopt-a-user, in particular helped to reduce the backlog of those seeking adoption from over 120 down to zero (this is starting to grow again, will have to do another adopter tree-shaking run). I do create articles whenever I'm the first on the scene with breaking news, as with Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X.. I'm also particularly pleased with two of the templates I designed - {{Truestatus}} & {{Statustop}} - which are used to effectively customize StatusBot and visually display said status, and allow other users to easily do so as well (for the latter I must credit Chetblong for the visual design). An overview of my contributions can be found at User:Xenocidic#Contributions. Lastly, I feel the interactions between myself and my adoptees has been helpful - for my adoptees and myself - as it has prompted me to expand my horizons.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: On the subject of stress, a user category I created was nominated and successfully deleted. During the discussion I became somewhat defensive. Looking back, I now see why it was not a worthwhile or useful category. I've been involved in a couple conflicts, but most of the time I try to resolve it with talk page resolutions, either directly with the editor, or on the talk page of the article. In the past, it may seem like I let my preference for the Xbox 360 somewhat colour my contributions as with the video game platform infobox order conflict. It was my opinion that the order listed by the press release should be used, others thought this was to preference the Xbox 360 (we've since reached a consensus to order the platforms by chronological-then-alphabetical order). Conflicts like this I've take to the Video games WikiProject for a wider range of opinions. Lately I've been steering clear of these conflicts altogether because they often tend towards lameness anyway. I've since been approaching such issues with neutrality in mind. On the subject of lamest edit wars, I've tried my best here and here to try and act as a facilitator to resolve the "Niko's nationality" debate listed at lamest edit wars, as I am a disinterested party.
General comments
- Links for Xenocidic: Xenocidic (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Xenocidic before commenting.