| Revision as of 16:41, 8 June 2008 edit86.2.32.31 (talk) Request for comment on inclusion of reference 22← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:45, 8 June 2008 edit undoAlientraveller (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers57,326 edits redundant discussion, and thanks for the edit conflictNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| ::What evidence is there that the call sheet is authentic? I think it looks real but is there coclusive proof? If not, the first editors removal of all refs seems apprpriate. Thoughts? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ::What evidence is there that the call sheet is authentic? I think it looks real but is there coclusive proof? If not, the first editors removal of all refs seems apprpriate. Thoughts? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| ::: That's it. It's just something posted by somebody to some board or other. Even if it comes from the production company, it could be a sample sheet or the cast could have been changed after it was produced. We have no way of authenticating it at all. --] 13:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | ::: That's it. It's just something posted by somebody to some board or other. Even if it comes from the production company, it could be a sample sheet or the cast could have been changed after it was produced. We have no way of authenticating it at all. --] 13:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==RfC: Is reference 22 permissable?== | |||
| {{RFCmedia| section=References !! reason=Reference 22 is a posting of an apparent casting sheet to a forum. It does not seem that it can be proved as 100% authentic and accurate (it may have changed). Is its inclusion permitted under Misplaced Pages rules? Thank you !! time= 16:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC) }} | |||
| 22 is a posting of an apparent casting sheet to a forum. It does not seem that it can be proved as 100% authentic and accurate (it may have changed). Is its inclusion permitted under Misplaced Pages rules? Thank you | |||
Revision as of 16:45, 8 June 2008
 | Film Unassessed  | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Just a reminder...
The production team of TF2 is throwing out so much false information (in hopes of engulfing any true leaks that may get out to the public) that it may be difficult to know what is fact and what is fiction. Keep your ears open! Ms. Sarita (talk) 18:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- I am aware, but rest assured I adhere highly to WP:RS, so it's not an issue. Alientraveller (talk) 18:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Well done!
I applaud Alientraveller for a job well done. You've lifted this article from a redirection into a great article, and it hasn't even been on for a week yet. Bravo. Evilgidgit (talk) 16:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. Alientraveller (talk) 21:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- And just a note: considering someone took this as an opportunity to bash me, just note: compliments or criticism goes to user talkpages. This applies to all talk pages. But it is nice. Alientraveller (talk) 10:46, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Jazz is dead
Michael Bay said so himself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.226.89.185 (talk) 01:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Could have been lying, but we will not know until an official announcement or when the film is out. Thus, I removed these rumours from the article. Alientraveller (talk) 10:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
3-D
So it's gonna b 3-D like Bewoulf?90.149.58.120 (talk) 16:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- So who's seen Beowulf in 3D? We don't know, because it's never been discussed beyond being listed by the distributors. When info arrives, it'll be in the article. Alientraveller (talk) 21:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Rumoured title
Head's up: this blog reports this film will be subtitled Revenge of the Fallen. A USA Today blog also reports it, although whether their source is this blog or if it's the other way round, remains to be seen. Secondly, will it be called Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen or contain the number? I will keep waiting for a press release or a Bay forum post. Alientraveller (talk) 15:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
It is confirmed.
- http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=45714
- http://www.superherohype.com/news/transformersnews.php?id=7298
- http://seibertron.com/news/view.php?id=13247
Kalas Grengar (talk) 17:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Simply because many sites report a rumour doesn't mean it is confirmed. Alientraveller (talk) 17:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- And now it is confirmed by Hasbro. Jeez, what a bizarre way to announce a title: putting it on a blog, then announcing it. Alientraveller (talk) 17:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Call sheet
I've removed all statements apparently sourced only from a purported call sheet that was posted to a forum. This is an encyclopedia, it isn't a place for gossip, speculation and dodgy references. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 11:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- A call sheet is not a dodgy reference. Alientraveller (talk) 15:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- What evidence is there that the call sheet is authentic? I think it looks real but is there coclusive proof? If not, the first editors removal of all refs seems apprpriate. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.2.32.31 (talk) 12:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- That's it. It's just something posted by somebody to some board or other. Even if it comes from the production company, it could be a sample sheet or the cast could have been changed after it was produced. We have no way of authenticating it at all. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 13:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- What evidence is there that the call sheet is authentic? I think it looks real but is there coclusive proof? If not, the first editors removal of all refs seems apprpriate. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.2.32.31 (talk) 12:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)