Misplaced Pages

User talk:60.42.252.205: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:03, 12 June 2008 editCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits warnin for repetitive and disruptive deletion campaign by 60.42.252.205← Previous edit Revision as of 17:55, 12 June 2008 edit undoCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits 3RR warningNext edit →
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Comfort women ==
'''Welcome'''


the summary was clear.
Hello, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]{{#if:|, such as the one you made in ]|}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:


one was a dutch page not in english. see general policy on use of english reference. one was immediately above. NONE included the actual quotation in context to prove the point ... which I then added.
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


actually the one that I added a quote is perfectly suitable to prove the point (being the Judgment International Military Tribunal for the Far East. the purpose is to prove the point after all not.
You are welcome to continue editing articles without ], but you may wish to '''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several ]. If you edit without a username, your ] ({{BASEPAGENAME}}) is used to identify you instead.


thank you --] (]) 17:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question and then place <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> before the question on this page. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:welcome-anon -->


:You are indeed right. Very sorry. --''']''' <sup>]</sup> 17:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
== June 2008 ==
::No, you're not right. The anon blanked yesterday on ] by his POV, and imporperly removed legitimate warnings.--] (]) 17:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


==June 2008==
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:uw-huggledelete1 --> ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 16:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
] Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages{{#if:Japanese war crimes|, as you did to ]}}, you will be ] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-delete3 -->--] (]) 17:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


] Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages{{#if:Japanese war crimes|, as you did to ]}}, you will be ] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-delete3 -->--] (]) 17:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC) ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to ] other editors{{#if:User talk:Caspian blue|, as you did on ]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa1 -->--] (]) 17:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br> The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages{{#if:Comfort women|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ] from editing. {{#if:Use talk page and get a consensus before making drastic changes or blanking properly cited infromation that you don't like.|Use talk page and get a consensus before making drastic changes or blanking properly cited infromation that you don't like.|}}<!-- Template:uw-delete4 -->--] (]) 17:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC) ] Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages{{#if:Slavery in Japan|, as you did to ]}}, you will be ] from editing. {{#if:Why are you keeping deleting contents here and there without any discussion? If you think the blanked information is misleading or should be taken out from the articles, please raise your concern at relevant talk pages. Besides, your definition of "irrelevance" seems to be very different from others.|Why are you keeping deleting contents here and there without any discussion? If you think the blanked information is misleading or should be taken out from the articles, please raise your concern at relevant talk pages. Besides, your definition of "irrelevance" seems to be very different from others.|}}<!-- Template:uw-delete3 -->--] (]) 17:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

==3RR warning==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:User talk:Caspian blue|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:If you remove any comment of others or blank your talk page, that is totally fine. However, you keep reverting your inappropriate comments with uncivil tone on MY TALK PAGE, so I would not regard it as a good-faith discussion. If you want to express your concern on matters that you think is wrong, please use relevant talk pages first. I did not say that every comfort women were forced by Japanese military. Your blanking by your own POV does not help for building a consensus.|If you remove any comment of others or blank your talk page, that is totally fine. However, you keep reverting your inappropriate comments with uncivil tone on MY TALK PAGE, so I would not regard it as a good-faith discussion. If you want to express your concern on matters that you think is wrong, please use relevant talk pages first. I did not say that every comfort women were forced by Japanese military. Your blanking by your own POV does not help for building a consensus.|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--] (]) 17:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

{{prettyquote|My friend, the intentions behind your actions are utterly transparent to any English speaker, never mind any experienced wikipedian (e.g. attempting to set my up for a 3RR in response to your reversion.}}

You violate 3RR on my talk page regardless of the several warnings. I finished up the Dutch source that you delete, which correctly fits to the content. I only see your blatant intentions as you blanked out chunks of properly sourced materials. So, do not insult me any more with your reversion. --] (]) 17:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:55, 12 June 2008

Comfort women

the summary was clear.

one was a dutch page not in english. see general policy on use of english reference. one was immediately above. NONE included the actual quotation in context to prove the point ... which I then added.

actually the one that I added a quote is perfectly suitable to prove the point (being the Judgment International Military Tribunal for the Far East. the purpose is to prove the point after all not.

thank you --60.42.252.205 (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

You are indeed right. Very sorry. --Selket 17:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
No, you're not right. The anon blanked yesterday on Japanese war crimes by his POV, and imporperly removed legitimate warnings.--Caspian blue (talk) 17:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Japanese war crimes, you will be blocked from editing. --Caspian blue (talk) 17:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Caspian blue. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Caspian blue (talk) 17:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Slavery in Japan, you will be blocked from editing. Why are you keeping deleting contents here and there without any discussion? If you think the blanked information is misleading or should be taken out from the articles, please raise your concern at relevant talk pages. Besides, your definition of "irrelevance" seems to be very different from others.--Caspian blue (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User talk:Caspian blue. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. If you remove any comment of others or blank your talk page, that is totally fine. However, you keep reverting your inappropriate comments with uncivil tone on MY TALK PAGE, so I would not regard it as a good-faith discussion. If you want to express your concern on matters that you think is wrong, please use relevant talk pages first. I did not say that every comfort women were forced by Japanese military. Your blanking by your own POV does not help for building a consensus.--Caspian blue (talk) 17:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


My friend, the intentions behind your actions are utterly transparent to any English speaker, never mind any experienced wikipedian (e.g. attempting to set my up for a 3RR in response to your reversion.

You violate 3RR on my talk page regardless of the several warnings. I finished up the Dutch source that you delete, which correctly fits to the content. I only see your blatant intentions as you blanked out chunks of properly sourced materials. So, do not insult me any more with your reversion. --Caspian blue (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)