| Revision as of 19:50, 12 June 2008 editMasem (talk | contribs)Administrators187,224 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Forest of the Dead. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:00, 12 June 2008 edit undoArcayne (talk | contribs)Rollbackers26,574 editsm got it, only newbies and trolls need template warningsNext edit → | ||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
| Your constant removal of continuity points, despite there being a discussion underway to whether the section should remain (which you started), is nothing short of vandalism. You want something changed, you wait for a discussion to be completed and then it will happen if it goes your way. You don't do what you believe to be right first, as that leaves an highly controversial edit on the page while s discussion is ongoing, which could possibly be days. You surely must understand that! As for seeing the discussion page, I'd love to know exactly what you'd like me to see. As of yet I haven't seen any support for any of your edits or proposals. ] (]) 15:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | Your constant removal of continuity points, despite there being a discussion underway to whether the section should remain (which you started), is nothing short of vandalism. You want something changed, you wait for a discussion to be completed and then it will happen if it goes your way. You don't do what you believe to be right first, as that leaves an highly controversial edit on the page while s discussion is ongoing, which could possibly be days. You surely must understand that! As for seeing the discussion page, I'd love to know exactly what you'd like me to see. As of yet I haven't seen any support for any of your edits or proposals. ] (]) 15:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Replied on your talk page. - ] ] 19:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | :Replied on your talk page. - ] ] 19:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == June 2008 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Forest of the Dead|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''This applies both to you and U-mos (which I will warn after this)'' ] 19:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:00, 12 June 2008
 | This user values third opinions and occasionally provides one. |
 | Caveat This user reserves the right to be more fun than you. |
Sunday 29 December20:24 UTC
What was archivedHet ArcayneHey this is Broncofreak i lost my pass. but this is my new account. seya User:dursely HiI would need third opinion here, would you be so kind and take a look. Thanks --Makedonij (talk) 22:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Since you asked for me to render a third opinion in the article, its best if you address me in the article discussion for the duration. That way, no one can claim that I am offering preferential treatment (since I won't be). - Arcayne () 23:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Negal/NergalI did provide a citation: that the spelling was given as "Nergal" in the reprint in Weird Secret Origins, which you can see on Nergal if you haven't reverted it.--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 13:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC) I understand what you're saying, but I'm unclear about how to cite something like this that is essentially internal. Do I need to change it to something like "Negal (sometimes spelled "Nergal")". --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 16:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC) It would be easier to cite if I had a copy. Info is from Rich Handley, who runs the Roots of the Swamp Thing web page. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC) The bset site I know of is DCUGuide.com, which lists them as "Nergal I" and "Nergal II". the spelling "Negal" that appears in The Golden Age Doctor Fate Archives and Countdown to Mystery does not appear, and unlike Handley, this site seems to think that the character in Hellblazer is a different character. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC) Doctor Who Trivia issuesI'm somewhat busy this week and so am not monitoring some pages as I might otherwise. If you decide to pursue the issue of trivia further in regards to the Doctor Who pages and need a voice of support, could you drop me a line on my talk page? I tend to agree that the material in question could easily be integrated elsewhere. At the most, it seems that the trivia in question might be limited to continuity between the two different series. That might make a bit of sense. Anyway, hope you don't mind the comment.Theplanetsaturn (talk) 20:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
spartans in halospartans are in halo, don't remove —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halolove (talk • contribs) 23:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
3RR guide now in WP spaceMisplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR/Administrator instructions Enigma 00:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thanksNice, upbeat reply. Always welcome! (20040302 (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)) Forest of the DeadYour constant removal of continuity points, despite there being a discussion underway to whether the section should remain (which you started), is nothing short of vandalism. You want something changed, you wait for a discussion to be completed and then it will happen if it goes your way. You don't do what you believe to be right first, as that leaves an highly controversial edit on the page while s discussion is ongoing, which could possibly be days. You surely must understand that! As for seeing the discussion page, I'd love to know exactly what you'd like me to see. As of yet I haven't seen any support for any of your edits or proposals. U-Mos (talk) 15:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
|
||||||
- Weird Secret Origins