Misplaced Pages

User:Banno: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:35, 29 August 2005 editWho (talk | contribs)20,719 edits Reverted edits by 172.193.15.230 to last version by CesarB← Previous edit Revision as of 18:42, 29 August 2005 edit undo172.197.60.213 (talk) Stop deleting the comments of others. Are you one of Banno's meatpuppets?Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Sockpuppet|1=CesarB|evidence=EVIDENCE}}
Evidence:

{| width=300 align=right bgcolor="#fffff6" style="border: 1px solid gray; padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; margin:1em 1em 1em 1em" {| width=300 align=right bgcolor="#fffff6" style="border: 1px solid gray; padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; margin:1em 1em 1em 1em"
| |

Revision as of 18:42, 29 August 2005

Multi-user iconAn editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of CesarB (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to EVIDENCE for evidence.
Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth
"Category:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of CesarB" does not exist.
Please use this link to create the category page
(The page will be pre-loaded. All you need to do is save it)

Evidence:

WikiProject Philosophy task list

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

  • Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
  • Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
  • Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
  • German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
  • Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
  • Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.
Edit this list | To do | stubs | Article alerts | Cleanup listing | Category | Portal | RFC | Deletion | Requested articles | Discussion

We make maximum sense of the words and thoughts of others when we interpret in a way that optimises agreement

Donald Davidson, On the very idea of a conceptual schema, in Inquiries into truth an interpretation, Ch. 13

Total edits | Wiktionary:User:Banno | Wikimedia:user:Banno | PhiloWiki all logs for Banno

Links

Playing with:

Keep an eye on:


Old stuff

  • General Philosophy

Tools

An aid to criticism

Some people think…; Some say that…; means I think this next bit is wrong.

Most people think…; Experts agree that…; means I think this next bit is right.

Essentially, (followed by a trite explanation) means I couldn’t be bothered doing a decent job on this bit

In fact, (followed by some statement) means that the statement is certainly wrong.

Anyone who has read the topic (or book or author) will know that… Means I havn’t read it, so I’ll just make this next bit up….


NPOV

A discussion of the merits of NPOV - and an interesting little bit of analytic philosophy: m:NPOV is an ideal

Things to remember

Things I only use once in a blue moon, but need to look for when I do...

  • <!-- comment here -->
  • <nowiki>
  • {{philo-stub}}
  • {{philosophy}}
  • {{main2|Article 1|Article 2}} - the number indictes number of articles...

The trouble with the Wiki is that people with half a mind to make an edit often do.

Banno

Never work with children or animals. The Wiki contains plenty of both. Increasingly, one is obliged to clean up after the animals and write for the children. Is it worth it?

Misplaced Pages is testimony to the power of procrastination. Everyone making a contribution ought really to be doing something else - So stop reading this and get back to work.

Category: