| Revision as of 19:08, 23 June 2008 editKeith D (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators544,506 edits Newsletter copied← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:45, 25 June 2008 edit undoKieferSkunk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,544 edits →Arbitration Request Filed: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| ==Newsletter== | ==Newsletter== | ||
| I have copied the June issue to a new ] issue ready for editing. ] (]) 19:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC) | I have copied the June issue to a new ] issue ready for editing. ] (]) 19:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Arbitration Request Filed == | |||
| Hi there. This notice is to inform you that a ] has been filed regarding the ongoing cultural dispute between ], yourself and several other editors. The Arbitration Committee will decide on whether this case should be heard and pursued. Thank you. — ''']''' (]) — 20:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:45, 25 June 2008
 Archives |
Pearson Park
Many thanks for creating the Pearson Park article, you were quick off the mark. The last point of Philip Larkin looks wrong though as the reference quotes number 32 and I thought it was 32 from previous conversations on the subject as that was the one I took a photo of for the Larkin editors. If you want some photos I took see here, another user moved them to commons so they are there now. Keith D (talk) 19:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- I was wondering about a gallery as there are so many listed features in the park. Geograph seems to have a few images of the features.What do you think?--Harkey (talk) 19:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Can do as it is a short article - can also add {{Commonscat}} for a link to all of the commons articles Keith D (talk) 20:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Kingston upon Hull
Looks like we failed on this one, a different reviewer has failed it with a different set of comments. Think it is difficult to get it to satisfy all the reviewers, not sure where we go from here with it. Keith D (talk) 21:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 24 | 9 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Constituent country
There has been a long centralized discussion at Talk:United Kingdom, in which it was decided with 83.33% consensus that constituent country would be used to describe England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. However, users at Scotland are saying that they will not accept a consensus made on another page, so I would like to inform you that there is now a similar vote on the Scotland talk page. Cheers --fone4me 20:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Newsletter
I have copied the June issue to a new July issue ready for editing. Keith D (talk) 19:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Arbitration Request Filed
Hi there. This notice is to inform you that a Request for Arbitration has been filed regarding the ongoing cultural dispute between User:Yorkshirian, yourself and several other editors. The Arbitration Committee will decide on whether this case should be heard and pursued. Thank you. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 20:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)