| Revision as of 13:02, 4 July 2008 view sourceFragments of Jade (talk | contribs)349 edits →Blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:11, 4 July 2008 view source Thatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 edits commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| The other user's comments WERE the vandalism. She was posting the personal information of two other users, and I'm talking about where they live here. That has got to be against some kind of rule. I read the privacy policy, and it said even staff is not allowed to do that. Are you honestly going to tell me it's perfectly okay to go around posting where people live right down to the state, city, and county? That's how predator's find people. And I'm sure neither of those people wanted their information being posted like that. If that's not against the rules, then Wiki needs to take a good look at it's policy, because that girl deserves to be blocked. I'll definately be contacting someone about this if it turns out there are no rules against violating the privacy of people posting on Wiki to such an extent. I mean, what's next? Is it going to be okay to give out phone numbers and street addresses? And for the record, above-mentioned user also reverted the article many times. And her edits were still the vandalism, as I cited my edit as the guidelines insist, but she kept reverting my edit. Why wasn't she blocked? I'm seriously going to contact someone about this, because that racist young lady should have been blocked some time ago.] (]) 12:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC) | The other user's comments WERE the vandalism. She was posting the personal information of two other users, and I'm talking about where they live here. That has got to be against some kind of rule. I read the privacy policy, and it said even staff is not allowed to do that. Are you honestly going to tell me it's perfectly okay to go around posting where people live right down to the state, city, and county? That's how predator's find people. And I'm sure neither of those people wanted their information being posted like that. If that's not against the rules, then Wiki needs to take a good look at it's policy, because that girl deserves to be blocked. I'll definately be contacting someone about this if it turns out there are no rules against violating the privacy of people posting on Wiki to such an extent. I mean, what's next? Is it going to be okay to give out phone numbers and street addresses? And for the record, above-mentioned user also reverted the article many times. And her edits were still the vandalism, as I cited my edit as the guidelines insist, but she kept reverting my edit. Why wasn't she blocked? I'm seriously going to contact someone about this, because that racist young lady should have been blocked some time ago.] (]) 12:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *I saw a 3RR violation by you, I did not see similar violations by the other users. (I only looked at July 2, edits from June are too stale to take action.) If, in order to maintain your preferred content, you are reverting against 2 or 3 or 4 different people, that's a pretty good sign that consensus is against you. Two people taking turns to revert is two people edit warring. One person reverting against 3 other users is one person edit warring. You may use the {{tl|unblock}} template to request an independent review. ] 13:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:11, 4 July 2008
Blocked
Blocked: 24 hours for edit warring and 3-revert-rule violation on Silent Hill. Thatcher 12:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
So, why is it that none of the other members of the edit war have been blocked? That's what really ticks me off.Fragments of Jade (talk) 12:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
The other user's comments WERE the vandalism. She was posting the personal information of two other users, and I'm talking about where they live here. That has got to be against some kind of rule. I read the privacy policy, and it said even staff is not allowed to do that. Are you honestly going to tell me it's perfectly okay to go around posting where people live right down to the state, city, and county? That's how predator's find people. And I'm sure neither of those people wanted their information being posted like that. If that's not against the rules, then Wiki needs to take a good look at it's policy, because that girl deserves to be blocked. I'll definately be contacting someone about this if it turns out there are no rules against violating the privacy of people posting on Wiki to such an extent. I mean, what's next? Is it going to be okay to give out phone numbers and street addresses? And for the record, above-mentioned user also reverted the article many times. And her edits were still the vandalism, as I cited my edit as the guidelines insist, but she kept reverting my edit. Why wasn't she blocked? I'm seriously going to contact someone about this, because that racist young lady should have been blocked some time ago.Fragments of Jade (talk) 12:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- I saw a 3RR violation by you, I did not see similar violations by the other users. (I only looked at July 2, edits from June are too stale to take action.) If, in order to maintain your preferred content, you are reverting against 2 or 3 or 4 different people, that's a pretty good sign that consensus is against you. Two people taking turns to revert is two people edit warring. One person reverting against 3 other users is one person edit warring. You may use the {{unblock}} template to request an independent review. Thatcher 13:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)