Misplaced Pages

Dating the Bible: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:22, 10 July 2008 editMeieimatai (talk | contribs)899 edits Modern->Modern era← Previous edit Revision as of 13:07, 10 July 2008 edit undoDbachmann (talk | contribs)227,714 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


The ''']''' is a compilation of various texts or "]" of different ages. The ''']''' is a compilation of various texts or "]" of different ages.
The compilation of the various books of the ] into a fixed canon according to the ]<ref>Bava Basra 14b-15a, Rashi to Megillah 3a, 14a</ref>was by the "]" by 450 BCE, and have since remained unchanged. However ] scholars are less certain, but believe that the process of canonization of the Tanakh became finalized between 200 BCE and 200 CE {{Fact|date=November 2007}}.<ref>Both the Law (Torah) and the Prophets (Nevi'im) appear to have been codified by the time of the composition of the book of ], c. 180 BCE; but the Writings (Ketuvim) may not yet have become an identified unit by this date{{Fact|date=November 2007}}.</ref> and some believe it is a product of the ] and ] AD, the period following the Roman ] and the subsequent ].{{fact}} A canon of the ] begins to emerge in the ], but remained in flux between the various ]. The compilation of the various books of the ] into a fixed canon is a product of the ] and ] AD, the period following the Roman ] and the subsequent ]. A canon of the ] begins to emerge in the ], but remained in flux between the various ].


Regarding the dates of the individual books, the dates of many of the texts of the ] are recorded in Jewish sources, and date to 12th century BCE although modern academic analysts find this difficult to establish, while those of the ] may be dated with some confidence to the 1st to 2nd centuries AD. Textual criticism places all of them within the ], although there is considerable uncertainty as to the century in some cases. The constituent parts of the Hebrew Bible are usually dated as follows: Regarding the dates of the individual books, those of the ] may be dated with some confidence to the 1st to 2nd centuries AD, while the dates of many of the texts of the ] are difficult to establish. Textual criticism places all of them within the ], although there is considerable uncertainty as to the century in some cases. The constituent parts of the Hebrew Bible are usually dated as follows:
⚫ *the ] was redacted into its final ] form around 450 BC, with its oldest parts dating back to as early as 1000 BC.<ref>Richard E. Friedman, ''Who Wrote the Bible?'' has 1000 BC to 950 BC for ]. </ref>
⚫ *of the ],the older books are 6th century BC compilations of 8th to 7th century BC material, while the younger books are post-exilic, dating to the 5th to 2nd centuries BC.
⚫ *of the ], some are exilic (6th century BC) compilations, while the bulk of the text is post-exilic (5th to 3rd centuries BC), the ] possibly as late as the 2nd century BC.


Traditional Jewish dates according for the ] are typically a few centuries earlier than the dates accepted by academia, putting the redaction of the Tanakh by the "]" before 450 BC<ref>Bava Basra 14b-15a, Rashi to Megillah 3a, 14a</ref> and the books of the Torah to before 1200 BC.
⚫ *the ], although held to have been a single text dated from one period in Judaism is believed to be was redacted into its final ] form around 450 BC by some modern secular scholars, with its oldest parts believed to be dating back to as early as 1000 BC.<ref>Richard E. Friedman, ''Who Wrote the Bible?'' has 1000 BC to 950 BC for ]. page ? </ref>
⚫ *the ], similarly, while dated in Jewish texts, is believed by the various modern academia for the older books to be 6th century BC compilations of 8th to 7th century BC material, while the younger books are post-exilic, dating to the 5th to 2nd centuries BC.
⚫ *the ], also having fairly precise dating in Jewish sources, but argued by some modern textual critics to be sometimes exilic (6th century BC) compilations, while the bulk of the texts are post-exilic (5th to 3rd centuries BC), the ] possibly as late as the 2nd century BC.


With the exception an extensive manuscripts and fragments (found among the ], discussed below), no Old Testament manuscript predates the 2nd century BC. The earliest manuscript of the New Testament is the ], a manuscript fragments of the ] dated to the first half of the 2nd century. The ] ], which contains most of the ], the ] P<sup>64/67</sup>, and the ] ] are other noted early manusript, dated ''c.'' 200, over a century after the New Testament books were most likely composed. For this reason, dating of the older texts cannot be done directly by dating manuscripts, but relies on ], ] and linguistic evidence, as well as direct references to historical events in the texts. With the exception an extensive manuscripts and fragments (found among the ], discussed below), no Old Testament manuscript predates the 2nd century BC. The earliest manuscript of the New Testament is the ], a manuscript fragments of the ] dated to the first half of the 2nd century. The ] ], which contains most of the ], the ] P<sup>64/67</sup>, and the ] ] are other noted early manusript, dated ''c.'' 200, over a century after the New Testament books were most likely composed. For this reason, dating of the older texts cannot be done directly by dating manuscripts, but relies on ], ] and linguistic evidence, as well as direct references to historical events in the texts.

Revision as of 13:07, 10 July 2008

Part of a series on the
Bible
The Malmesbury Bible
Biblical studies
Biblical criticism
Interpretation
Perspectives
Outline of Bible-related topics
Bible portal
This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. Please help clarify the article. There might be a discussion about this on the talk page. (January 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
It has been suggested that this article be split into articles titled Date of the Hebrew Bible and Chronology of the books of the New Testament. (discuss)

The Bible is a compilation of various texts or "books" of different ages. The compilation of the various books of the Hebrew Bible into a fixed canon is a product of the 70s and 80s AD, the period following the Roman sack of Jerusalem and the subsequent dispersion of the Jews. A canon of the New Testament begins to emerge in the 4th century, but remained in flux between the various Christian denominations.

Regarding the dates of the individual books, those of the New Testament may be dated with some confidence to the 1st to 2nd centuries AD, while the dates of many of the texts of the Hebrew Bible are difficult to establish. Textual criticism places all of them within the 1st millennium BC, although there is considerable uncertainty as to the century in some cases. The constituent parts of the Hebrew Bible are usually dated as follows:

  • the Torah was redacted into its final five books form around 450 BC, with its oldest parts dating back to as early as 1000 BC.
  • of the Nevi'im,the older books are 6th century BC compilations of 8th to 7th century BC material, while the younger books are post-exilic, dating to the 5th to 2nd centuries BC.
  • of the Ketuvim, some are exilic (6th century BC) compilations, while the bulk of the text is post-exilic (5th to 3rd centuries BC), the Book of Daniel possibly as late as the 2nd century BC.

Traditional Jewish dates according for the Talmud are typically a few centuries earlier than the dates accepted by academia, putting the redaction of the Tanakh by the "Men of the Great Assembly" before 450 BC and the books of the Torah to before 1200 BC.

With the exception an extensive manuscripts and fragments (found among the Dead Sea scrolls, discussed below), no Old Testament manuscript predates the 2nd century BC. The earliest manuscript of the New Testament is the Rylands Library Papyrus P52, a manuscript fragments of the Gospel of John dated to the first half of the 2nd century. The Chester Beatty Papyri P, which contains most of the Pauline epistles, the Magdalen papyrus P, and the Bodmer Papyri P are other noted early manusript, dated c. 200, over a century after the New Testament books were most likely composed. For this reason, dating of the older texts cannot be done directly by dating manuscripts, but relies on textual criticism, philological and linguistic evidence, as well as direct references to historical events in the texts.

The Hebrew Bible

The authorship of the various texts in Tanakh (the Hebrew Bible) is an open topic of research. Therefore, assigning solid dates to any of the texts is difficult.

The range of dates assigned to the Torah (Pentateuch) is rather broad. It is certain to predate the 2nd century BC, but mainstream estimates of its oldest elements range from the 10th to the 6th centuries BC. The bulk of the Tanakh was likely complete by the end of the Babylonian captivity (537 BC) and had probably reached its fixed Masoretic form by the 4th century BC. The text had certainly become fixed by the 1st century BC and the completion of the Septuagint.

Torah

Some critical scholars (the 'Biblical Minimalists") insist that the whole of the Torah shows evidence of its construction composed after 538 BC, perhaps with material from an earlier oral tradition, as it were a "prequel" to the prophetic books.

Other people such as Israel Finkelstein, whose archeological studies tend to suggest that a substantial portion of the Pentateuch is a 7th century BC construction, designed to promote the dynastic ambitions of King Josiah of Judah. The 6th century BCE Books of Kings tells of the rediscovery of an old book by King Josiah, which would be the oldest part of the Torah, around which Josiah's scribes would have fabricated the remaining text:

And Hilkiah the high priest said unto Shaphan the scribe, I have found the book of the law in the house of the LORD. And Hilkiah gave the book to Shaphan, and he read it. (2 Kings 22:8 KJV)

Under Josiah's rule there would then for the first time have been a unified and centralized state of Judah around the worship of Yahweh based at the Temple in Jerusalem, portraying King Josiah as the legitimate successor to the legendary David and thus the rightful ruler of Judah. According to this interpretation, neighboring countries that kept many written records, such as Egypt, Persia, etc., have no writings about the stories of the Bible or its main characters before 650 BC, and the archaeological record of pre-Josiac Israel does not support the existence of a unified state in the time of David. Such claims are detailed in Who Were the Early Israelites? by William G. Dever (William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI, 2003). Another such book is The Bible Unearthed by Neil A. Silberman and Israel Finkelstein (Simon and Schuster, New York, 2001).

A traditional strain of scholarship (the "Biblical maximalists") would assign portions of the Pentateuch (generally, the J author) to the period of the United Monarchy in the 10th century BC, would date Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic history to the time of King Josiah, and that the final form of the Torah was due to a redactor in exilic or postexilic times (6th century BC). This view is based on the account of the finding of the "book of law" in 2 Kings 22:8, which would correspond to the core of Deuteronomy, and the remaining parts of the Torah would have been composed to supply a background from traditional accounts to the rediscovered text.

Nevi'im

The major Nevi'im ("Prophets").

The Books of Kings mentions the following sources:

  1. The "book of the acts of Solomon" (1 Kings 11:41)
  2. The "book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah" (14:29; 15:7, 23, etc.)
  3. The "book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel" (14:19; 15:31; 16:14, 20, 27, etc.).

The date of its composition was perhaps some time between 561 BC, the date of the last chapter (2 Kings 25), when Jehoiachin was released from captivity by Evil-merodach, and 538 BC, the date of the decree of deliverance by Cyrus the Great.

The Book of Isaiah, in its present form, is by most scholars considered the result of an extensive editing process, in which the promises of God's salvation are reinterpreted and claimed for the Judean people through the history of their exile and return to the land of Judah. Very few scholars dispute these conclusions and argue for the unity of the composition of the book. When the Septuagint version was made (about 250 BC), the entire contents of the book were ascribed to Isaiah, the son of Amoz. In the time of Jesus, the book existed in its present form, with many prophecies in the disputed portions quoted in the New Testament as the words of Isaiah.

Ketuvim (Hagiographia)

Traditionally, the Book of Daniel was believed to have been written by its namesake during and shortly after the Babylonian exile in the 6th century BC. However, most mainstream scholars find this view to be untenable in light of both archaeology and textual analysis. Scholarship on the dating of the Book of Daniel largely falls into two camps: one dates the book in its entirety to a single author during the desecration of the Jerusalem Temple (167–164 BC) under the Syrian-Greek ruler Antiochus IV Epiphanes (ruled 175–164 BC); the other sees it as a collection of stories dating from different times throughout the Hellenistic period (with some of the material possibly going back to very late Persian period), with the visions in chapters 7–12 having been added during the desecration of Antiochus. For example, Hartman and Di Lella, 1978 suggest multiple authorship, with some material dating to the 3rd century, culminating with a 2nd-century editor and redactor.

The reasons for these dates include a use of Greek and Persian words in the Hebrew of the text unlikely to happen in the 6th century, that the style of the Hebrew and Aramaic was more like that of a later date, that the use of the word "Chaldean" occurs in a fashion unknown to the 6th century, and that repeated historical gaffes betray an ignorance of the facts of the 6th century that a high official in Babylon would not have, while the 2nd-century history was found to be far more accurate (see Ferrell Till's analysis).

John Collins, on the other hand, finds it impossible for the "court tales" portion of Daniel to have been written in 2nd century BC because of textual analysis. In his 1992 Anchor Bible Dictionary entry for the Book of Daniel, he states, "it is clear that the court-tales in chapters 1–6 were 'not written in Maccabean times'. It is not even possible to isolate a single verse which betrays an editorial insertion from that period."

Oldest manuscripts

The oldest known preserved fragment of a Torah text is a good luck charm inscribed with a text close to, although not identical with, the Priestly Blessing found in Num 6:24–27, dated to approximately 600 BC (Dever, p. 180). The oldest complete or nearly complete texts are the Dead Sea Scrolls from the middle of the 2nd century BC to the 1st century AD. The DSS contain almost all the books of the Tanakha, although not all are complete.

According to tradition the Torah was translated into Greek (the Septuagint, or 70, from the traditional number of translators) in the 3rd century BC. The oldest Greek manuscripts include 2nd century BC fragments of Leviticus and Deuteronomy and 1st century BC fragments of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, and the Minor Prophets. Relatively complete manuscripts of the Septuagint include the Codex Vaticanus and the Codex Sinaiticus of the 4th century and the Codex Alexandrinus of the 5th century—these are the oldest surviving nearly-complete manuscripts of the Old Testament in any language.

The Hebrew or Masoretic text of the Torah is held by tradition to have been assembled in the 4th century AD, but the oldest extant complete or near-complete manuscripts are the Aleppo Codex, ca. 920 CAD, and the Westminster Leningrad Codex, dated to 1008 AD.

Additional manuscripts include the Samaritan Torah and the Peshitta, the latter a translation of the Christian Bible into Syriac, the earliest known copy of which dates to the 2nd century AD.

Differences between manuscripts can provide significantly different interpretations of the contemporary bible.

The New Testament

The most accepted historical understanding of how the Synoptic gospels developed is known as the two-source hypothesis. This theory holds that Mark is the oldest gospel. Matthew and Luke are believed to come later, and draw on Mark and also on a source that is now believed to be lost, called the Q document, or just "Q". Some, but not many, conservative scholars reject the two-source hypothesis and say it suffers from a number of weaknesses in terms of historicity and textual issues.

Mainstream views assume that the bulk of New Testament texts date to the century between AD 50 and AD 110, with the Pauline epistles among the earliest texts. The following table gives mainstream estimates. Minority views may pre- or post-date the individual books by several decades.

Book Approximate date
Gospel of Matthew 60-105 AD
Gospel of Mark 60-105 AD
Gospel of Luke 60-105 AD
Gospel of John 90-100 AD
Acts 80-105 AD
Romans 57–58 AD
Corinthians 57 AD
Galatians 45-55 AD
Ephesians 65 AD
Philippians 57–62 AD
Colossians 60 AD+
Thessalonians 50 AD
Timothy 60-100 AD
Titus 60-100 AD
Philemon 56 AD
Hebrews 60-90 AD
James 60-200 AD
First Peter 90-96 AD
Second Peter 100-140 AD
Epistles of John 95-110 AD
Jude 60-100 AD
Revelation 81-96 AD

The Gnostic Scriptures

The Nag Hammadi library, a collection of books found in 1945, some refer to as Gnostic Scriptures (which include the Gospel of Thomas), were not accepted as canonical by Jerome in the 4th century AD. They were written in Coptic and are generally dated to the 3rd and 4th centuries AD, though the Gospel of Thomas has ignited some debate, and scholars argue that it dates from 50 AD(Koester, HDS) to the late 2nd century AD(Miers).

Traditional school

See also Biblical literalism.

In Late Antiquity and throughout the Middle Ages, neither Jewish nor Christian scholars questioned that the Tanakh, and for Christians the New Testament as well, were accurate historical renditions of the events portrayed, written by the traditionally-attributed authors. The only errors acknowledged were minor ones attributable to copyists. Today, such views are largely confined to Orthodox Jewish scholars and evangelical and/or fundamentalist scholars such as Kenneth Kitchen, Gleason Archer, and Bryant G. Wood.

Many of the scholars who hold conservative views believe that Torah was written from the mid to late 15th century BC, on the basis of 1 Kings 6:1. Similarly, they say, the book of Isaiah in its entirety was written by Isaiah himself (as stated in Isaiah 1:1), and that the book of Daniel was written by the court official who lived and worked from the time of Nebuchadnezzar to the first year of Cyrus. Where events and people are mentioned before they happened or were born, they are explained as evidences of God's ability to tell the future in his communication with mankind; this reliance on the supernatural renders the approach essentially irrefutable.

These traditional views went unchallenged down to the emergence of rationalism in the 17th century (see documentary hypothesis).

In respect of the New Testament, scholars of the traditionalist school such as FF Bruce, Gary Habermas, Norman Geisler, Bruce Metzger, John Wenham, John Warwick Montgomery, and Edwin M. Yamauchi agree with the historically and traditionally recognized dates for the New Testament, such as

  • The first three Gospels, Acts, Paul's Epistles, Hebrews, James, and Peter's Epistles were written in the period between about 50–65 CE.
  • The Gospel of John, John's Epistles, Jude, and Revelation were written between about 85–100 AD.

See also

Notes

  1. Richard E. Friedman, Who Wrote the Bible? has 1000 BC to 950 BC for J.
  2. Bava Basra 14b-15a, Rashi to Megillah 3a, 14a
  3. Rahlfs nos. 801, 819, and 957
  4. Rahlfs nos. 802, 803, 805, 848, 942, and 943

Further reading

  • Bruce, F.F The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? (6th Edition), Eerdmans, 2003. 5th edition
  • Dever, William G. What Did The Biblical Writers Know & When Did They Know It?, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI, USA, 2001.
  • Fox, Robin Lane The Unauthorized Version: Truth and Fiction in the Bible, NY, 1992.
  • Hartman, Louis Francis, and Di Lella, Alexander A. (Ed) The Book of Daniel (Anchor Bible, Vol. 23), Anchor Bible, 1978.
  • Külling, Samuel Zur Datierung der Genesis "P" Stücke PhD dissertation, 1970
  • Pagels, Elaine The Gnostic Gospels, Vintage, reissued 1989.

External links

Category: