| Revision as of 19:38, 13 July 2008 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits →Quackwatch: cmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:42, 13 July 2008 edit undoElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,958 edits →Quackwatch: - replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ::::::::Ludwigs2 restored the deleted information. | ::::::::Ludwigs2 restored the deleted information. | ||
| ::::::::This was a revert by Ludwigs2. ] 19:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | ::::::::This was a revert by Ludwigs2. ] 19:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| : I would rather that you didn't, because you are again mis-defining the term "revert". I am keeping close tabs on Ludwigs2's edits, and have been engaging him in discussion at his talkpage. If he makes a real revert, I assure you I'll be dealing with him very rapidly. --]]] 19:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:42, 13 July 2008
SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages as of April 2008.Welcome
Greetings...
Hello, QuackGuru, and welcome to Misplaced Pages!
- To get started, click on the green welcome.
- I hope you like it here and decide to stay!
- Xp54321
- Happy editing! Xp54321 (talk) 21:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Xp54321
- I hope you like it here and decide to stay!
Quackwatch
QuackGuru, enough, you are now arguing with two different administrators about the definition of "revert". I recommend that you take a break, and avoid posting at Talk:Quackwatch for a day. If you disagree, I can upgrade this to a formal ban, but I'm hoping that simply asking you to take a break will suffice. Please go work on something else for awhile? --Elonka 19:21, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
I think there was a misunderstanding. The text is sourced.
I was in the middle of writing this comment. Can I finish posting this comment.
- This information was deleted. but criticizes its rhetorical style as "perhaps not the best way to win an argument, especially with serious-minded people."
- Ludwigs2 restored the deleted information.
- This was a revert by Ludwigs2. QuackGuru 19:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- I would rather that you didn't, because you are again mis-defining the term "revert". I am keeping close tabs on Ludwigs2's edits, and have been engaging him in discussion at his talkpage. If he makes a real revert, I assure you I'll be dealing with him very rapidly. --Elonka 19:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)