Revision as of 17:12, 19 July 2008 editThemightyquill (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers30,624 edits category for deletion← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:15, 19 July 2008 edit undoThemightyquill (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers30,624 edits Uw-3rrNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
If you disagree, your argument should be on that category's talk page, not on ]. - ] (]) 17:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC) | If you disagree, your argument should be on that category's talk page, not on ]. - ] (]) 17:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:In fact, if you feel strongly about the issue, please add your comments at ]. Thanks. - ] (]) 17:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC) | :In fact, if you feel strongly about the issue, please add your comments at ]. Thanks. - ] (]) 17:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Uw-3rr|Irgun}} |
Revision as of 17:15, 19 July 2008
Irgun
I understand your point (and largely agree) but Category:Terrorism makes no differentiation about who refers to a person/organization as terrorism:
"This category deals with topics relating to events, organizations, or people that have at some point in time been referred to as terrorism, terrorists, etc., including state terrorism."
If you disagree, your argument should be on that category's talk page, not on Irgun. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 17:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- In fact, if you feel strongly about the issue, please add your comments at Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_July_19#Category:Nationalist_terrorism. Thanks. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 17:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Irgun shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.