Revision as of 04:35, 20 July 2008 editJerem43 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers54,113 edits →Stop, please: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:36, 20 July 2008 edit undoJerem43 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers54,113 edits →Stop, please: alsoNext edit → | ||
Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
RE: Herbs and Spices templates. | RE: Herbs and Spices templates. | ||
Please do not blanket undo my edits as they have taken me a good deal of time do. Please do not undo that I have a valid reason for doing this, and yours is tenuous at best. The templates are redundant and can stand to be merged. I am still working on this and you are causing problems. | Please do not blanket undo my edits as they have taken me a good deal of time do. Please do not undo that I have a valid reason for doing this, and yours is tenuous at best. The templates are redundant and can stand to be merged. I am still working on this and you are causing problems. '''Being bold here'''. (the bolding of the bold statement is a joke) | ||
--] (<small> ]</small>) 04:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | --] (<small> ]</small>) 04:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:36, 20 July 2008
Archived talk
- Archive 1 (June 24, 2005 - April 24, 2006)
- Archive 2 (April 24, 2006 - June 18, 2006)
- Archive 3 (June 19, 2006 - August 25, 2006)
- Archive 4 (August 29, 2006 - November 13, 2006)
- Archive 5 (November 13, 2006 - February 2, 2007)
- Archive 6 (February 2, 2007 - March 15, 2007)
- Archive 7 (March 15, 2007 - April 24, 2007)
- Archive 8 (April 25, 2007 - June 17, 2007)
- Archive 9 (June 18, 2007 - August 1, 2007)
- Archive 10 (August 2, 2007 - October 12, 2007)
- Archive 11 (October 13, 2007 - December 26, 2007)
- Archive 12 (December 28, 2007 - February 29, 2008)
- Archive 13 (March 1, 2008 - July 5, 2008)
Thank you
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
For your diligence in overseeing the ongoing debate of Vietnamese and Chinese history. It also appears you do much more than I thought and this is well-deserved for your rounded efforts. Cheers! .:davumaya:. 07:22, 5 July 2008 (UTC) |
Issue with TinucherianBot in Project Banner Tagging for WP:FOOD
Thank you for expressing your concerns on the recent issue Issue with TinucherianBot in Project Banner Tagging for WP:FOOD . I have made some comments and explainations at Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval#TinucherianBot and I am leaving this note just for your information -- TinuCherian - 08:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- I dont understand , david is repeatedly blocking the bot by saying some reason or another...How many times did I iterate the fact that I am not going to mass tag any more now... I fail to understand what he intend too... :( I am really demoralized and down... Please advice me what should I do? -- TinuCherian - 12:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Cubeb
Thanks for the nice image, which I have been waiting for several years (since my creation of the article in 2006). I notice that the berries are tail-less? I suppose the tails have been removed in the process. --BorgQueen (talk) 03:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- I did notice what looked like shell fragments but I didn't know you broke it intentionally. Actually I never tasted cubeb, but I know it is more bitter than black pepper which is one of the reasons why its culinary use has been discontinued (according to the books). --BorgQueen (talk) 03:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Q-Bert capitalization
I think Q-Bert should be spelled with a capital B. This seems to be the way he prefers it. Badagnani 03:32, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- On what do you base your opinion? —Wiki Wikardo 07:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Map
Please do not be biased and try to confuse the readers by putting the Thai map on a Cambodian temple page. Thank you for your understanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardworking (talk • contribs) 23:29, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:Hardworking
You have my backing to report the user to the administrators. The user had been making edits in defiance of agreed discussion and is acting in bad faith after I've reminded him/her about it. DHN (talk) 23:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Edits
As I have said, I am only editing texts with biased information. Thanks for the understanding and not issuing unreasonable warnings.Hardworking (talk) 23:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Talks
If you want to, you are welcome to discuss with me about all the texts you are changing.Hardworking (talk) 00:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Re: Hosaina
An article already exists on this town; have a look at Hosaena. Please add any missing info you may have! -- llywrch (talk) 04:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Because there are so many of them? About the only article that lists all of the woredas in a given Region is Gambela Region -- which has only 8. As for a category, Blofeld of SPECTRE went & did all of the work for all of the woredas in Ethiopia back in March; see, for example Category: Cities, towns and villages in the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People's Region. -- llywrch (talk) 04:42, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Uh, leave the Special woredas -- they don't belong to any Zone. so that is why they are listed. -- llywrch (talk) 04:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Blanking
Hi, could you check out this edit, and this editor's edits in general? Badagnani (talk) 23:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
It's getting extremely problematic? Could you have a look at ? Badagnani (talk) 00:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you; I think the contributions should be looked at as well. Badagnani (talk) 00:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- It's a bit impossible for me to block him and then edit against him while he is incapacitated. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oh definietly. I've looked at his edits, and wasn't impressed, hence the block. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Ближний и Средний Восток
Hi Badagnani,
In case you missed it, I answered your question in my talk page.
Regards, Anatoli --Atitarev (talk) 22:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Native American mascot controversy
You want to do the WP:3RR? I already issued a warning. Justinm1978 (talk) 02:04, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
A discussion
An important discussion on " Should WikiProjects get prior approval of other WikiProjects (Descendant or Related or any ) to tag articles that overlaps their scope ? " is open here . We welcome you to participate and give your valuable opinions. You are receiving this note since I thought you may be interested in this disussion. -- TinuCherian - , member of WikiProject Council. 13:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Craziness
- Badagnani is crazy by starting these short articles of on interest. What purpose they serve? --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.170.104.70 (talk • contribs)
They are stubs. Articles should be combined when possible for the good of Misplaced Pages! --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.170.104.70 (talk • contribs)
Miraculin
Hi there. I'm sorry, but no—it seems its structure hasn't been published yet :) I can make one for curculin, though. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yep. Apparently, it's highly homologous to soybean trypsin inhibitor. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Preah Vihear, Siam Nakhorn
Please do not just revert edits without considering the facts. Siam Nakhorn doesn't exist anymore, nor is it a Thailand location. For Preah Vihear temple, please do not added information without proving it. If you continue to act this way, I will refer you to the administrators.DQconnect (talk) 00:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Blanking
Hi, can you look at ? Thanks, Badagnani (talk) 00:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, how did you know it was a sock? Badagnani (talk) 00:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- I have checkuser ability which allows me to get people's IP addresses. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Meal, Combat, Individual
I think the date cake was added postwar. I am trying to focus on the Vietnam War era rations before I add the postwar modifications. I really can't find a lot of info on the postwar rations used between 1972 to 1983. Hotspur23 (talk) 03:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
I just found out that it is Date Pudding; an alternate for the "D-2 (Cake)" Dessert Group. I have since updated the article. Perhaps there was a Date Cake after the war, but not during. Hotspur23 (talk) 04:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
I nbeed you to unlnk the photo from the C-ration page, because it discusses the rations used from 1938-1958. The MCI page covers the totally different Vietnam-era ration. Thanks. Hotspur23 (talk) 05:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:July 2008
I didn't remove any important scripts on wikipedia page. I just only remove unnecessary scripts on Prasat Preah Vihear that it is not needed. --Kiensvay (talk) 03:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Chocolate Discs
The Chocolate Discs were flat, circular, and thin pieces of chocolate that were individually wrapped in foil and came two to a can. The thicker fudge discs were chocolate-coated fudge that came packaged in cellophane and came one to a can. Hotspur23 (talk) 06:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
WP:FDBanners
KISS principle --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 07:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Go to bed Buckeye boy. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 08:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Hindi -- Indic script
Hello! This was done by you. Obviously there's something wrong with my browser coz' I see it as Ha-ni-di an not Hi-na-di? What's the probem with my browser (Opera 9.0)? --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 13:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Polish Americans
The only way to overcome this is to prove that the closer did wrong though a deletion review process. The closer did ignore that fact that, for nearly all ethnic Americans, the category name is 'fooian Americans' with only one editor creating a bunch of 'Americans of xxx descent' categories for those who are less than 50% 'fooian'. The same editor will now want to get rid of all 'foonian American' categories and replace them with 'Americans of fooian descent'--as he is doing with the rest of such categories throughout the world. The closer chose to look at all these changes as 'precedent' and ignore the existing pattern for Americans. Hmains (talk) 02:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Having fun lying and abusing power?
Badagnani
You are clearly abusing your editorial powers by accusing me of blanking pages (I repeat "blanking PAGES") when I have done no such thing. I have repeatedly removed a single piece of information, not a whole page, and you know this full well. Anybody looking at the history can also see this to be true.
That single piece of information is irrelevant to the article, as has been pointed out by several other editors.
Again: the Thai name for a temple that is not in Thailand, is not administered by the Thais and was not built by the Thais is irrelevant in an article in English.
The words Khao Phra Viharn are relevant only in a Thai-language encyclopaedia or as part of a reference to the international relations between Cambodia and Thailand as they pertain to the temple and Thailand's continued flouting of international law in regards to the 1962 judgement of the International Court of Justice or internal Thai politics of the sort currently being practiced by Sonthi Limthongkul.
203.144.65.25 (talk) 06:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- We would agree to it. 206.170.104.70 (talk) 22:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Balsamic Vinegar
The story i posted about balsamic vinegar may not be fact, but it is definately a rumour that can be found on the back of a specific brand of vinegar in the USA ( i don't remember which one ) and therefor i feel its relevent...sorry for exagerating it a bit proof, about half way down the page
So why did u delete it again? i proved it to you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.113.240 (talk) 21:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:Vietnamese names
I'm not aware of any Vietnamese names for any of the items you mentioned. DHN (talk) 22:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Character counter
I normally use this. --BorgQueen (talk) 22:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Armenian soups
I am doing housekeeping, clearing stale merger proposals. I notice that you have previously reverted attempts to redirect Armenian soups to Cuisine of Armenia, a merger which otherwise appears uncontroversial apart from your objections, which from the edit summaries appear entirely procedural. Firstly, you argue that there was "no discussion nor consensus" on such a merger. I note, however, that this is not grounds to oppose a merger, per WP:Merge#How to merge pages: "Merging is a normal editing action, something any editor can do, and as such does not need to be proposed and processed. If you think merging something improves the encyclopedia, you can be bold and perform the merge, as described below. Because of this, it makes little sense to object to a merge purely on procedural grounds, e.g. "you cannot do that without discussion" is not a good argument." Secondly, you have also argued that other pages on soups exist, which is certainly true, however to me this merge seems entirely appropriate as an editorial decision to create one good quality article on Armenian food in preference to a series of smaller bad ones. Are there any other grounds upon which you would oppose completing the previously attempted merger? Debate 木 00:54, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- With respect, as above, consensus is not required to be sought per WP:Merge (quoted above). Nonetheless, consensus in this case was sought via a merger tag that has been on the article now for over a year. To date, no objections have been made to such a merger, making it apparently uncontroversial. Other than procedural grounds, as discussed above, do you have any substantive objections to completing this proposed merger? Debate 木 01:26, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- What evidence of consensus would you require to resolve your concerns? Debate 木 01:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- You have suggested various steps that you would prefer be undertaken advertising a proposed merger, most of which are significantly more detailed than what is required by WP:Merge, especially for an article about soup. Nonetheless, which talk pages do you suggest that the proposed merger be advertised to, and what level of participation (how many contributors to the discussion) would be required, and how long would you propose the discussion be before a decision is made? If only one editor objects to the proposal after extended discussion, would in your view that mean that 'consensus' had not been achieved and that the merger, therefore, should not take place? Debate 木 01:54, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
I have initiated a merger discussion at Talk:Cuisine of Armenia#Merger of Armenian soups into this article. I look forward to your input. Debate 木 03:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Chris Wallace (journalist)
I have reverted you addition of the category Category:American Jews to the Chris Wallace (journalist) article, as there are no references provided to bear this out, nor any mention of Wallace's religious affiliation in the article that I can find. We can add this back if his religion can be substantiated. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- I realize you've been here a while, but we still need to see proof of your assertion. Gotta have references, and at least a passing mention in the article itself. I see no refs - you just added the category and tha's all. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 13:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Brady's Leap
I saw your comment on the Samuel Brady article. I checked the Kent Parks and Rec site and despite that sign, they do list it as a separate park here. That sign is confusing to say the least, though. My guess is that since the Riveredge trail is there (soon to be part of the Portage Hike and Bike Trail) and Brady's Leap is a current endpoint, the sign's purpose is to identify an entrance to Riveredge park. Well, that's my best guess at least! You live in Kent so you already know that the parks are contiguous anyway. --JonRidinger (talk) 20:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- A park different from John Brown Tannery Park on Stow Street? That's the only one I'm familiar with. --JonRidinger (talk) 20:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Sotdae
I have made the correction you suggested. Thank you. Next time, please report such errors at "Main Page error reports", at the top of the Main Page talk page, that is, Talk:Main Page. (Also known as WP:ERRORS.) Art LaPella (talk) 21:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Rum Swizzle
I left a note for you on the talk page. - House of Scandal (talk) 06:51, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Pub Taskforce
I've started a Pub Taskforce page: Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Beer/Pub Taskforce - come over and sign up. And I have made an attempt at creating an Infobox, but it's not very good: {{Infobox Pub}}. Can you see if you can do a better one? I have tested it on Hope and Anchor, Islington. Regards SilkTork * 11:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Rum Swizzle
On 16 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rum Swizzle, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Glass Goblet Award
GLASS GOBLET AWARD
Badagnani is hereby granted this Glass Goblet Award for having concocted surprisingly good contributions to the Rum Swizzle article that helped make Encyclopedic Champaign out of AfD Dregs. Keep up the good work. - House of Scandal (talk) 16:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC) |
You're wrong
See Talk:Treaty of Saigon (Vietnam)#Annam. Kinh Duong Vuong (talk) 21:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Lob bomb
On 16 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lob bomb, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 23:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:Vạn Kiếp
According to vi.wiki, Vạn Kiếp was located at the intersection of the Cầu, Thương, Đuống, Kinh Thày and Thái Bình Rivers, now located in Chi Linh District, Hai Duong Province. DHN (talk) 05:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:Sate
I don't think it refers to either of those terms. It seems to be mentioned in Laos cuisine, so it might come from Khmer or Laos, but that's just a guess. DHN (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:Lac Viet
I feel that I don't know enough about the topic to start an article about it myself. Even the title is going to cause controversy. The vi.wiki article doesn't seem to have references either. I think Taylor might have some information about it. DHN (talk) 05:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:Links
Sorry that the template wasn't clear for you. You reintroduced information that I removed as spam with this edit: . The link information with the link as the source fails WP:SPAM, WP:SOAP, and WP:SELFPUB. Further, all the information in that sentence is already available elsewhere in the article, hence my edit summary of "promotional, linkspam, redundant." --Ronz (talk) 23:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:Xoi
Thank you for your message. I'm Vietnamese. So I guess in a way you could say I specialize in Vietnamese culture. Eistube (talk) 23:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Stop, please
RE: Herbs and Spices templates.
Please do not blanket undo my edits as they have taken me a good deal of time do. Please do not undo that I have a valid reason for doing this, and yours is tenuous at best. The templates are redundant and can stand to be merged. I am still working on this and you are causing problems. Being bold here. (the bolding of the bold statement is a joke)