Revision as of 05:06, 20 July 2008 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by Hpf888 - "→Discuss first: "← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:22, 20 July 2008 edit undoOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits rv per WP:BLP, WP:Coatrack and WP:3RRNext edit → | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== Unpopular staff with questionable conduct and inadequate academic backgroun == | == Unpopular staff with questionable conduct and inadequate academic backgroun == | ||
I have once again removed the controversial material which 2 editors keep on re-inserting in the article, and very recently here in the talk page. The material is ], ], and at best an ] on individuals who may or ] be dead. There are now ] warnings on talk pages of both users. ] (]) 04:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
I think it's better to keep the following in the main text: | |||
:LI KANG LAU (李镜鎏) started teaching Chinese and Chinese history without any degrees for a long time, in 1990s, he even tried to attend few university classes without school board's permission. With the help from Szeto Wah (hometown Kai Ping), he became a member of senate for Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union in 2000s. | |||
:LI BING CHONG (李秉松) taught Chinese and Chinese history for a long time, he was a colleague of LI KANG LAU. In 2001, it was discovered he had sex with a teenager for years, he was afraid to put in jail and committed suicide in the same year. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:12, 14 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Discuss first == | == Discuss first == |
Revision as of 06:22, 20 July 2008
Hong Kong Start‑class | |||||||||||||||
|
Schools Start‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Moved from article
Trivia
- In the 2004-2005 annual school report, it is written that basketball team members were satisfied with a football team coach .
- There are numerous mistakes in the School Handbook, such as: In the English version, Typhoid fever is noted with an incubation period of 7-12 days, Viral hepatitis A with 15-50 days; while in the Chinese version, the first is noted with an incubation period of 7-21 days, the latter with 15-20 days.
This really is trivia with no place on WP. Rich Farmbrough 17:13 26 August 2006 (GMT).
Oh poor soul
What have I done? I have just reverted the edits by His Royal Highness Ohconfucius removing the Mission part, dubbing it a "copyright violation" and "promotional", and kindly commanding us not to reinsert it! Disregarding that, I reinserted it nonetheless, not just because my girlfriend has just left me and I have nothing else to do but to seek to anger His Royal Highness, Ohconfucius. In my amazement, I did not find my backyard ruined by a meteor. Despite the fact that reason is virtually non-existent in such an absolute monarchy, I still find myself offering my poor soul an excuse or two to comfort my shattered self-dignity.
Why the hell did I do it? What was I thinking, to reinsert a whole section that is obviously a copyright violation and, miraculously, but no doubt, promotional at the same time? Littered with Traditional Chinese characters, yes, you fool, Aranherunar, you have just reinserted a section obviously written by a Taiwan agent - maybe even the great Chen Shuibian himself! Run, before the Commies catch you! You have just reinserted a whole paragraph, full of copyrighted English words! Yes! You should be sentenced to thirty years in prison, no chance of parole! And all the while, don't ever THINK about reinserting the section again! Shit! Does Shakespeare have a lawyer? Aran|heru|nar 06:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
The rant of a madman? or hopeless eccentric?, or just an attempt at sarcasm? I'll leave the community to judge. Many wikipedia editors believe the mission statement is promotional. please take this discussion to WP:SCH. Ohconfucius 05:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- WEASEL? Weasel WHERE?! Weasel HERE? Weasel THERE? NO WEASEL ANYWHERE! :'( /cry Aran|heru|nar 12:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Unpopular staff with questionable conduct and inadequate academic backgroun
I have once again removed the controversial material which 2 editors keep on re-inserting in the article, and very recently here in the talk page. The material is inadequately sourced, not relevant, and at best an attack on individuals who may or may not be dead. There are now WP:3RR warnings on talk pages of both users. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Discuss first
Hello guys, also discuss and solve issues, but don't fight! --Ploesualion (talk) 18:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- 哈哈,剛看到。姓李呢两條嘢就係賤,死賤種,黑人憎,抵死。~~~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpf888 (talk • contribs) 05:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)