Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Bill Ayers election controversy: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:37, 20 July 2008 editScjessey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,021 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Bill Ayers election controversy  Revision as of 21:52, 20 July 2008 edit undoWorkerBee74 (talk | contribs)787 edits Blatant attempt to influence content dispute in another articleNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|Bill Ayers election controversy}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Bill Ayers election controversy}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
POV fork to get around ] and ] ] (]) 21:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC) POV fork to get around ] and ] ] (]) 21:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

*'''Strongly opposed.''' Thirty minutes after I mentioned at ] that "no one here has nominated for deletion, Scjessey raced over here and nominated it for deletion. A blatant, shameless attempt to influence a content dispute in another article. Very notable, impeccably sourced. Should be a GA nominee rather than an AfD nominee. ] (]) 21:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:52, 20 July 2008

Bill Ayers election controversy

Bill Ayers election controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

POV fork to get around WP:BLP and WP:WEIGHT Scjessey (talk) 21:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Strongly opposed. Thirty minutes after I mentioned at Talk:Barack Obama that "no one here has nominated for deletion, Scjessey raced over here and nominated it for deletion. A blatant, shameless attempt to influence a content dispute in another article. Very notable, impeccably sourced. Should be a GA nominee rather than an AfD nominee. WorkerBee74 (talk) 21:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Categories: