Misplaced Pages

Talk:Anglophilia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:17, 18 July 2008 editFrancis Tyers (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,572 edits Versions← Previous edit Revision as of 12:22, 22 July 2008 edit undoJagdfeld (talk | contribs)1,226 edits VersionsNext edit →
Line 66: Line 66:


::::Material that is uncited is being restored, in violation of the policies of Misplaced Pages. I would implore that this come to an end. - ] ] 12:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC) ::::Material that is uncited is being restored, in violation of the policies of Misplaced Pages. I would implore that this come to an end. - ] ] 12:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

:::::In fact you keep removing sourced material. (PS your command of the English language might be improved.) ] (]) 12:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:22, 22 July 2008

WikiProject iconEngland NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Sources reminder

A reminder to everyone. The list is of notable people - red links are not accepted. And sources have to be provided. Jagdfeld (talk) 09:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Sourced examples

These can be restored when sources backing them up are provided:

Assad

The concept that Assad is an Anglophile is a bit ludicrous. He clearly does not believe in British ideals such as parliamentary democracy, due process, common law, or the sovereignty of the individual. A single sourced statement, without anything more than circumstantial evidence, is not sufficient. - 64.222.149.167 (talk) 03:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Alex Salmond

This article is clearly a joke. Alex Salmond? Hates the English more than anything. 78.105.206.30 (talk) 14:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

I Hardly think he does.(Butters x (talk) 18:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC))

Versions

The version to which I am reverting is an improvement over the other version as it removes trivia and uncited assertions. - Francis Tyers · 11:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

In fact you are removing a substantial portion of the article - sourced as well as yet unsourced - and doing so against the wishes of the other editors. There's some rule about that kind of thing. Jagdfeld (talk) 09:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
The fact that you like it does not overcome Misplaced Pages's policies. You are restoring a large amount of text with no references at all. On this, policy is clear. - Francis Tyers · 15:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Looking through we are now hacking at individual parts of the article rather than removing most of it, progress of a sort I guess. I do think we need to mediate this rather than remove whole rafts of material. CorleoneSerpicoMontana (talk) 12:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Material that is uncited is being restored, in violation of the policies of Misplaced Pages. I would implore that this come to an end. - Francis Tyers · 12:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
In fact you keep removing sourced material. (PS your command of the English language might be improved.) Jagdfeld (talk) 12:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Categories: