| Revision as of 21:05, 11 September 2005 editZephram Stark (talk | contribs)1,402 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:45, 11 September 2005 edit undoZephram Stark (talk | contribs)1,402 edits Watching Misplaced Pages go down the crapshoot because you don't have the balls to stand against JayjgNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| <p align=right><font color=#003311 size=7 face="Times New Roman, Times, Serif">W T F ''?'''!!'''''</FONT></p><font color=#ffffff><p>.<p></font> | <p align=right><font color=#003311 size=7 face="Times New Roman, Times, Serif">W T F ''?'''!!'''''</FONT></p><font color=#ffffff><p>.<p></font> | ||
| <font color=#003311>I'm being railroaded on the Administrator's board with no avenue to defend myself or method of logging a complaint against this administrator. Everyone who fails to support Jayjg's non-definition of terrorism is blocked, discredited, and sometimes even banned permanently (I think Mr. Go Cowboys is the eleventh editor to which this this has happened.) What has he done wrong? Absolutely nothing. His only crime is that he is being accused of being me—-same as the other ten editors. I haven't said anything because it is none of my business. If these editors want to stand up for themselves, I would be happy to help them, but none of them have dared to take a stand. If Misplaced Pages wants to kick out people who have done nothing except contribute to articles, that is their business. But now I'm getting punished because Jayjg accuses them of being me? Does anyone care what this is doing to Misplaced Pages? Does a single one of you have the balls to stand up for what you know is right? </FONT><font color=#ffffff><p>.<p></font> | |||
Revision as of 21:45, 11 September 2005
Help! I'm being oppressed!!
.
- "For those who haven't noticed, he's now banned for another two days for creating User:Go Cowboys, and crudely cloning the userpage of User:Zzyzx11 to conceal the account's newness." – Smyth\
.
- "For those who haven't noticed, he's now banned for another two days for creating User:Go Cowboys, and crudely cloning the userpage of User:Zzyzx11 to conceal the account's newness." – Smyth\
W T F ?!!
.
I'm being railroaded on the Administrator's board with no avenue to defend myself or method of logging a complaint against this administrator. Everyone who fails to support Jayjg's non-definition of terrorism is blocked, discredited, and sometimes even banned permanently (I think Mr. Go Cowboys is the eleventh editor to which this this has happened.) What has he done wrong? Absolutely nothing. His only crime is that he is being accused of being me—-same as the other ten editors. I haven't said anything because it is none of my business. If these editors want to stand up for themselves, I would be happy to help them, but none of them have dared to take a stand. If Misplaced Pages wants to kick out people who have done nothing except contribute to articles, that is their business. But now I'm getting punished because Jayjg accuses them of being me? Does anyone care what this is doing to Misplaced Pages? Does a single one of you have the balls to stand up for what you know is right?
.
Not an Enemy: A Response to Uncle Ed
In my edit history, Uncle Ed left me a little note: " 21:53, 7 September 2005 Ed Poor (not an enemy, unless that's how you want it) "
My response is: Misplaced Pages editors don't need friends in high places. We need a level playing field. The best article should rise to the top, not the one supported by the highest ranking official. If you want to help Misplaced Pages and her editors, demote administrators that use their power to unduly influence an article, and do it on their first offense. With greater power comes greater responsibility to stave off corruption. --Zephram Stark 21:02, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
Examples
- If you need examples, I can name about a hundred, but so could almost anyone else I've talked with about the problem. You could start with Jayjg's blocking and reverting the articles of everyone who disagreed with him at terrorism. You could add his buddy, Jpgordon's, locking of the article in order to avoid the 3RR limit in reverts, which they would have reached, even with their blocking. If that's not enough, you could add SlimVirgin's conveniently forgetting to block anyone who viciously argued her side of the terrorism discussion, while blocking everyone, not already blocked by Jayjg, who argued against her agenda (9 in all, I believe, with legitimate IP service addresses all around the world). You could read in the discussion how all three of them dared anyone to come in and support me using their login accounts, and when they did, how they were immediately blocked and labeled "sockpuppets." You could look through Jayjg's User_talk to see the dozens of people he has done similar things to, but you would have to go to his edit history, because he deletes negative responses from his talk page. --Zephram Stark 21:43, 8 September 2005 (UTC)