| Revision as of 15:56, 12 August 2008 editCrispmuncher (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,911 editsm →Gratuitous → Gratis versus Libre: Correct punctuation← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:16, 12 August 2008 edit undoUtgard Loki (talk | contribs)2,260 edits →WP:GANG → Misplaced Pages:Tag teamNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *How is this clearly inappropriate? "two or more editors work in concert in a disruptive way" sounds like a description of people 'ganging up' to me. ] | ] 15:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC) | *How is this clearly inappropriate? "two or more editors work in concert in a disruptive way" sounds like a description of people 'ganging up' to me. ] | ] 15:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''': "Two or more" is a "criminal organization?" Wow! I would regard two or more as cooperation, and alleging that every two or three people who disagree with you are disruptive is fantastically insulting. No. We do not need to encourage people to write ''personal essays'' about their experiences in name space, and we especially do not wish to perpetuate that embattled, nasty spirit in redirects. This is an attempt at antagonizing. ] (]) 17:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ====] → ]==== | ====] → ]==== | ||
Revision as of 17:16, 12 August 2008
< August 11 August 13 >August 12
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 12, 2008
Public transport crashes → List of United Kingdom disasters by death toll
Not a valid redirect Edward (talk) 13:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:GANG → Misplaced Pages:Tag team
Clearly inappropriate target. One could make a case for WP:CABAL. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- How is this clearly inappropriate? "two or more editors work in concert in a disruptive way" sounds like a description of people 'ganging up' to me. Olaf Davis | Talk 15:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: "Two or more" is a "criminal organization?" Wow! I would regard two or more as cooperation, and alleging that every two or three people who disagree with you are disruptive is fantastically insulting. No. We do not need to encourage people to write personal essays about their experiences in name space, and we especially do not wish to perpetuate that embattled, nasty spirit in redirects. This is an attempt at antagonizing. Utgard Loki (talk) 17:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Gratuitous → Gratis versus Libre
"Gratuitous" (unnecessary) appears to be confused with "Gratis" ("free") .CrispMuncher (talk) 15:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)