| Revision as of 13:46, 1 September 2008 editThe Thunderer (talk | contribs)4,015 edits Warning | Revision as of 14:28, 1 September 2008 edit undoBerby (talk | contribs)15 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==] case== | |||
| ] You are in danger of violating the ]{{#if:Republic of Ireland| on ]}}. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from editing.] (]) 13:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {| align="left" | |||
| || ] | |||
| |} | |||
| You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] (]) 13:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Whats a sock? Can you explain what I'm being accussed of please?] (]) 13:56, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::The links above provide you with all you need to know. ] (]) 13:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ok. I'm still a bit confused. What deceptive work am I doing? I'm just reverting to proven fact and using Misplaced Pages policy to back it up.Its not as if I'm vandalising or putting in POV or something.] (]) 14:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| It doesn't really matter what you're using these socks for, as there are only a few legitimate reasons for having alternative accounts. And constant reverts, baiting and generally being disruptive are definitely not included. Further, you state "proven fact", but ignore that the sentence in question needs to make it absolutely clear that NI athletes can declare for another country. And your edit confuses that fact - it doesn't help readers fully grasp the issue. So don't claim that you are doing anything based on "fact". Your little ] sockfarm is a travesty of mis-guided counter-productivity and disruption that has no place on this project. ] (]) 14:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sockfarm? I'm really confused to as what some other editor has to do with me? Really your jumping some gun here.] (]) 14:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:28, 1 September 2008
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Ovlem for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Traditional unionist (talk) 13:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Whats a sock? Can you explain what I'm being accussed of please?Berby (talk) 13:56, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- The links above provide you with all you need to know. Traditional unionist (talk) 13:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. I'm still a bit confused. What deceptive work am I doing? I'm just reverting to proven fact and using Misplaced Pages policy to back it up.Its not as if I'm vandalising or putting in POV or something.Berby (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- The links above provide you with all you need to know. Traditional unionist (talk) 13:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
It doesn't really matter what you're using these socks for, as there are only a few legitimate reasons for having alternative accounts. And constant reverts, baiting and generally being disruptive are definitely not included. Further, you state "proven fact", but ignore that the sentence in question needs to make it absolutely clear that NI athletes can declare for another country. And your edit confuses that fact - it doesn't help readers fully grasp the issue. So don't claim that you are doing anything based on "fact". Your little SPA sockfarm is a travesty of mis-guided counter-productivity and disruption that has no place on this project. Guliolopez (talk) 14:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sockfarm? I'm really confused to as what some other editor has to do with me? Really your jumping some gun here.Berby (talk) 14:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)