| Revision as of 00:20, 8 September 2008 edit86.42.119.12 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:24, 8 September 2008 edit undoGoodDay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers492,989 edits →Matt Lewis 2: respondingNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| ::: :-) Some days are a complete waste, and this was a gloriously wasted day on wikipedia, GoodDay. I achieved nothing in the real world. I did manage to chat up the fiery Sarah, who was having none of my advances at all. Alas. ;-) ] (]) 00:20, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | ::: :-) Some days are a complete waste, and this was a gloriously wasted day on wikipedia, GoodDay. I achieved nothing in the real world. I did manage to chat up the fiery Sarah, who was having none of my advances at all. Alas. ;-) ] (]) 00:20, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::She may be playin' hard to get. ] (]) 00:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:24, 8 September 2008
The RoI discussion
Trust me, bringing up British Imperialism in that discussion, isn't going to help matters. GoodDay (talk) 19:06, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- I could be wrong, but I doubt the British Isles article will be moved. No hard feelings, by the way. GoodDay (talk) 18:39, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Matt Lewis 1
- You wrote this is a heading called "Matt Lewis" on British Isles talk (I moved it to my talk page): "Trust me, any satisfaction you find on wikipedia will be ephemeral if you have achieved little in the real world on your own merits. That is undoubtedly your real problem, and your disproportionate anger here reflects that real-world situation." That is a personal attack, with no merit other than to demean me personally. And this is a serious warning. --Matt Lewis (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. Are you the same Matt Lewis who has been making accusations of racism, obstruction, dishonesty and much else against numerous posters- all on the current Talk: British Isles talk page for everybody to see? You seem to threaten and personally undermine quite a few people there. 86.42.119.12 (talk) 23:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Matt Lewis 2
I think you know what's coming.
- >>>Yes, of course it could be... if you're a complete and utter gobshite and miss the opening line addressed to, well, a different person, for starters. I know, however, that you did not miss that opening line, GoodDay. :-) ] (]) 21:35, 7 September 2008 (UTC)" So when GoodDay saw you being potentially aggressive, he mistook who you said it to. You have abused AGF to suggest that he did not miss it and call him a "gobshite". And you still happen to have said it, though it was not so bad as your response to it .It seems to me that because you are an IP address you feel you can comment like you are in a playground. --Matt Lewis (talk) 21:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- This is a silly claim (note: I did not call you silly). As this extract makes clear I specifically excluded GoodDay from entering the realms of being a complete and utter gobshite. I embraced AGF, not abused it, so please desist from these scatological contributions. 86.42.119.12 (talk) 23:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- 'Tis alright Matt; he/she is quite entertaining. Besides, 86 doesn't seem to respond on his/her IP talk page. GoodDay (talk) 22:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- There you go, not a bother on the lad. 86.42.119.12 (talk) 23:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hah! Thou does respond here, afterall. Jolly good show. GoodDay (talk) 23:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- :-) Some days are a complete waste, and this was a gloriously wasted day on wikipedia, GoodDay. I achieved nothing in the real world. I did manage to chat up the fiery Sarah, who was having none of my advances at all. Alas. ;-) 86.42.119.12 (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- She may be playin' hard to get. GoodDay (talk) 00:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)