| Revision as of 16:41, 22 September 2005 view source205.217.105.2 (talk) it is better to avoid listing "spam" or "advertisement" if that is the sole reason for deletion.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:43, 22 September 2005 view source Plugwash (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,427 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Since there can be a fine line between articles that are promotional and those that are simply informational, it is better to avoid listing "spam" or "advertisement" as the sole basis for article deletion. Articles posted on Misplaced Pages about products, companies, bands, etc. that do not meet established ] criteria can be dealt with by listing them on ]. On some occasions, the content can be removed temporarily on the basis of a suspected copyright violation, since the text is often copied from another website and posted anonymously. | Since there can be a fine line between articles that are promotional and those that are simply informational, it is better to avoid listing "spam" or "advertisement" as the sole basis for article deletion. Articles posted on Misplaced Pages about products, companies, bands, etc. that do not meet established ] criteria can be dealt with by listing them on ]. On some occasions, the content can be removed temporarily on the basis of a suspected copyright violation, since the text is often copied from another website and posted anonymously. | ||
| If an article is about a notable company or product but is written like an advertisement, it is more appropriate, to rewrite the article from a ]. | |||
| == External link spamming == | == External link spamming == | ||
Revision as of 16:43, 22 September 2005
Shortcut- ]
 | This page documents an English Misplaced Pages guideline. Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page. |
]
There are two types of wikispam: advertisements masquerading as articles, and wide-scale external link spamming. Articles considered advertisements include those that are solicitations for a business, product or service, or are public relations pieces designed to promote a company or individual. Wikispam articles are usually noted for sales-oriented language and external links to a commercial website. A differentiation should be made between spam articles and legitimate articles about commercial entities, however.
There is also "Wikipedian-on-Wikipedian" spamming, or "internal spamming".
Advertisements masquerading as articles
Since there can be a fine line between articles that are promotional and those that are simply informational, it is better to avoid listing "spam" or "advertisement" as the sole basis for article deletion. Articles posted on Misplaced Pages about products, companies, bands, etc. that do not meet established notability criteria can be dealt with by listing them on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion. On some occasions, the content can be removed temporarily on the basis of a suspected copyright violation, since the text is often copied from another website and posted anonymously.
If an article is about a notable company or product but is written like an advertisement, it is more appropriate, to rewrite the article from a neutral point of view.
External link spamming
A few parties now appear to have a spambot capable of spamming wikis from several different wiki engines, analogous to the submitter scripts for guestbooks and blogs. They have a database of a few hundred wikis. Typically they insert external links. Like blog spam, their aim is to improve their search engine rankings, not to directly advertise their product.
If you see a bot inserting external links, please consider checking the other language wikis to see if the attack is widespread. If it is, please contact a sysop on the meta-wiki: they can put in a site-wide text filter. Any meta sysop can edit the site-wide spam blacklist to add or remove the pattern that are recognized by the filter, with the changes taking effect immediately. New links can also be added to the list if a new spammer should start making the rounds.
Sysops are authorised to block unauthorised bots on sight. Spam bots should be treated equivalently to vandalbots. Edits by spambots constitute unauthorised defacement of websites, which is against the law in many countries, and may result in complaints to ISPs and (ultimately) prosecution.
Internal spamming
By internal spamming, we mean cross-posting of messages to a large number of user talk pages, by Wikipedians, in order to promote Misplaced Pages matters such as elections, disputes, discussions, etc. It also includes the use of a custom signature to automatically append some promotional message to every signed post.
It's too early to make any definitive rules about this, but some general guidelines are:
- Clean up your mess. For example, after engaging in cross-posting to promote some election, be sure to remove those cross-posts after the election is complete.
- Be open. Don't make cross-posts that initially appear to be individual messages.
- Be polite. Wikiquette issues are extra-important when a message is likely to be read by many people.
- Less redundancy. Rather than copying the same five page essay to twenty talk pages, write it once, in the place where it is most relevant, and then link to it.
- Don't use a bot. If you're not willing to spend the time personally sending the messages, don't force us to spend the time reading it (or throwing it away).
There are often better alternatives to internal spamming. For example, suppose you've written a cool new article, and you want lots of people to read it. Simply add links to it from other encyclopedia articles, where it is relevant, and also add it to appropriate categories. This increases the exposure of your article, while simultaneously benefiting the encyclopedia, without annoying your fellow contributors.
How not to be a spammer
Sometimes, people come to Misplaced Pages with the intention of spamming -- creating articles which are mere advertisements or self-promotion, or spewing external links to a Web site over many articles.
And sometimes, people spam Misplaced Pages without meaning to. That is, they do things which Wikipedians consider to be spamming, without realizing that their actions are not in line with building an encyclopedia. A new editor who owns a business may see that there are articles about other businesses on Misplaced Pages, and conclude that it would be appropriate to create his own such article. A Web site operator may see many places in Misplaced Pages where her site would be relevant, and quickly add several dozen links to it.
The following guidelines are intended to suggest how not to be a spammer -- that is, how to mention a Web site, product, business, or other resource without appearing to the Misplaced Pages community that you are trying to abuse Misplaced Pages for self-promotion.
- Review your intentions. Misplaced Pages is not a space for the promotion of products, Web sites, fandoms, ideologies, or other memes. If you're here to tell readers how great something is, or to get exposure for an idea or product that nobody's heard of yet, you're in the wrong place. Likewise, if you're here to make sure that the famous Misplaced Pages cites you as the authority on something (and possibly pull up your sagging PageRank) you'll probably be disappointed.
- Contribute cited text, not bare links. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a link farm. If you have a source to contribute, first contribute some facts that you learned from that source, then cite the source. Don't simply direct readers to another site for the useful facts; add useful facts to the article, then cite the site where you found them. You're here to improve Misplaced Pages -- not just to funnel readers off of Misplaced Pages and onto some other site, right? (If not, see #1 above.)
- The References section is for references. A reference directs the reader to a work that the writer(s) referred to while writing the article. The References section of a Misplaced Pages article isn't just a list of related works; it is specifically the list of works used as sources. Therefore, it can never be correct to add a link or reference to References sections if nobody editing the text of the article has actually referred to it.
- Don't make a new article for your own product or Web site. Most often, when a person creates a new article describing their own work, it's because the work is not yet notable enough to have attracted anyone else's attention. Articles of this sort are known as vanity pages and are usually deleted. Misplaced Pages does indeed have articles about popular products and Web sites, but it is not acceptable to use Misplaced Pages to popularize them.
- Don't gratuitously set off our spam radar. There are certain stylistic behaviors that will say "spam!" loud and clear to anyone who's watching:
- Adding a link to the top of an unordered list. This is an A-number-1, red-flag, hot-button spam sign. It suggests that you want people to look at your link FIRST FIRST FIRST! You wouldn't butt in at the head of a queue; don't put your link first.
- Adding a link that's snazzier than any of the others. If there's a list of products that gives just their names, and you add a product with a short blurb about how great it is, we'll all know why you did it.
- Adding many links to (or mentions of) the same site or product. Going through an article and adding the name of your product to every paragraph where it seems relevant is just going to attract the revert button.
- Adding the same link to many articles. The first person who notices you doing this will go through all your recent contributions with an itchy trigger finger on the revert button. And that's not very much fun.
- If your product is truly relevant to an article, others will agree -- try the talk page. We usually recommend that editors be bold in adding directly to articles. But if the above advice makes you concerned that others will regard your contribution as spam, you can find out without taking that risk: Describe your work on the article's talk page, asking other editors if it is relevant.
See also
- Misplaced Pages:Replies to common objections#Advertisers
- Misplaced Pages:External links - more guidance and policy on which external links should be included and which should not.
- Misplaced Pages:Companies, corporations and economic information/Notability and inclusion guidelines