| Revision as of 05:03, 22 September 2008 editWalkerma (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,186 edits →Version 0.7 reviewing: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:19, 22 September 2008 edit undoTbsdy lives (talk | contribs)7,977 edits →Signature - my question still stands: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| So, are you able to help? Many thanks, ] (]) 05:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC) | So, are you able to help? Many thanks, ] (]) 05:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Signature - my question still stands == | |||
| I notice that you've archived my comment. | |||
| :You wrote "If you don't explain why it's annoying to you, this doesn't help much. Adding an explanation mark to every other sentence may appear annoying to me and others, but I wouldn't bother commenting on your talk page about this. | |||
| Anyways, the timestamp is not required. If comments are added in sequence as I do this, in most cases, there isn't much use in adding one. -- User:Docu" | |||
| I have explained why - it's annoying to others as they can't just easily click on the link to discuss things with you, and I've already explained that it's hard to tell at what time you responded. My question stands: why is it so difficult to use <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> to sign posts? What is your reasoning? - ] (]) 05:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:19, 22 September 2008
Picture of the day,_Regga,_Gozo,_Malta,_2021-08-23,_DD_14.jpg)
Mediterranean moray
Photograph credit: Diego Delso
- Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Misplaced Pages:How does one edit a page and experiment at Misplaced Pages:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Misplaced Pages:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149
- For more talk, see "Page history".
- For bot related questions, see User talk:D6.
Template on Classification of Lakes
Plase read my suggestions on the lake template and also my suggestion of posting a template for classification of lakes.I am basing the clasifcation on the artcile I have co-authored on Lake Management in India for ILEC--Nvvchar (talk) 10:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Coordinate
{{Coordinate}}is in use on four articles. Rich Farmbrough, 01:57 22 September 2008 (UTC).
- and .. ? -- User:Docu
Version 0.7 reviewing
Hi, I see that you've signed up for the 1.0 review team. We need your help right now, because we had around 70 nominations last week! As you probably know, Version 0.7 is coming out soon, mainly based on the bot selection. This relieves us of the burden of manually assessing 30,000 articles, but we need the manual system to catch the articles that might "fall through the cracks" - such as a couple of missing provinces needed to complete a set. If you're no longer interested in reviewing, please can you remove your name from the list of reviewers?
You should consult the criteria and the FAQs, but I would suggest that most manual nominations of B-Class articles or higher are expected to pass, unless they are fairly obscure. You can get a good sense of the importance by looking at the article in the bot's list (check the talk page to find which projects have tagged it); an importance score (excluding quality) of <700 indicates that the article is probably too obscure, unless it is needed to complete a useful set (e.g., all the counties of England). I take the view that if someone who is knowledgeable on the topic spends the time to nominate the article, it is likely to be OK, but just occasionally people try to argue for an obscure or poor-quality article.
So, are you able to help? Many thanks, Walkerma (talk) 05:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Signature - my question still stands
I notice that you've archived my comment.
- You wrote "If you don't explain why it's annoying to you, this doesn't help much. Adding an explanation mark to every other sentence may appear annoying to me and others, but I wouldn't bother commenting on your talk page about this.
Anyways, the timestamp is not required. If comments are added in sequence as I do this, in most cases, there isn't much use in adding one. -- User:Docu"
I have explained why - it's annoying to others as they can't just easily click on the link to discuss things with you, and I've already explained that it's hard to tell at what time you responded. My question stands: why is it so difficult to use ~~~~ to sign posts? What is your reasoning? - Tbsdy lives (talk) 05:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC)