| Revision as of 22:51, 27 September 2008 editAmalthea (talk | contribs)31,926 edits sure, looks fine← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:22, 27 September 2008 edit undoKww (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers82,486 edits →Restore article?Next edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :: Well, in this way the article is more complete, with well-sourced informations and I think it should be restored.] (]) 14:20, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | :: Well, in this way the article is more complete, with well-sourced informations and I think it should be restored.] (]) 14:20, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| : Of course, it looks fine. Notability was never in question, and there is enough verifiable material to warrant an article. Once it is moved into article space ] should be restored and used in the article. Cheers, <span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 22:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | : Of course, it looks fine. Notability was never in question, and there is enough verifiable material to warrant an article. Once it is moved into article space ] should be restored and used in the article. Cheers, <span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 22:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| : OK, that leaves just me as the last editor that argued for redirect. I'll go on record as saying that I oppose restoring the article. Most single articles are basically an infobox, that same infobox restated in sentences, a chart box, and a sentence that basically says ''For the video, people sang and danced while lip-syncing the lyrics''. This article isn't an exception. With the redundancy removed, 99.9% of single articles work best as being a part of the parent album. | |||
| : That said, I told Kikkokalabud that if he did his part by writing an article that other editors would accept, I'd take him through the steps of restoring an article that had been removed through AFD. He did a good job of that, and, as you can see from the edit history, responded well when I ripped his first version apart. He fixed the problems without getting angry, and I think he learned a lot about how to write a well-sourced article. I'll leave a request with an admin to merge the histories and restore the article.] (]) 23:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:22, 27 September 2008
Restore article?
This section is for people to comment on whether they believe this version of the article can be restored, overriding the AFD result of "redirect."Kww (talk) 13:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- I got no issues with restoring it like that. Note that better ref formatting is, er, better, but for me not a dealbreaker. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- Well, in this way the article is more complete, with well-sourced informations and I think it should be restored.Voices4ever (talk) 14:20, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- Of course, it looks fine. Notability was never in question, and there is enough verifiable material to warrant an article. Once it is moved into article space Image:Vanessa Hudgens - Say OK.jpg should be restored and used in the article. Cheers, Amalthea 22:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- OK, that leaves just me as the last editor that argued for redirect. I'll go on record as saying that I oppose restoring the article. Most single articles are basically an infobox, that same infobox restated in sentences, a chart box, and a sentence that basically says For the video, people sang and danced while lip-syncing the lyrics. This article isn't an exception. With the redundancy removed, 99.9% of single articles work best as being a part of the parent album.
- That said, I told Kikkokalabud that if he did his part by writing an article that other editors would accept, I'd take him through the steps of restoring an article that had been removed through AFD. He did a good job of that, and, as you can see from the edit history, responded well when I ripped his first version apart. He fixed the problems without getting angry, and I think he learned a lot about how to write a well-sourced article. I'll leave a request with an admin to merge the histories and restore the article.Kww (talk) 23:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)