| Revision as of 22:31, 28 September 2008 editGoingoveredge (talk | contribs)398 edits rvv. adding peer-reviewed work as opposed to self-published cranks← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:51, 28 September 2008 edit undoNirvana888 (talk | contribs)Rollbackers3,882 editsm Undid revision 241638143 by Goingoveredge (talk) Use Talk page to build consensus. Edit warring won't help your case.Next edit → | ||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
| On the other hand, Founder and President of the Economic Strategy Institute and former counselor to the Secretary of Commerce in the Reagan Administration ] has predicted that "It is going to be India's century. India is going to be the biggest economy in the world. It is going to be the biggest superpower of the 21st century."<ref>, Rediff India, Published March 29, 2006</ref> | On the other hand, Founder and President of the Economic Strategy Institute and former counselor to the Secretary of Commerce in the Reagan Administration ] has predicted that "It is going to be India's century. India is going to be the biggest economy in the world. It is going to be the biggest superpower of the 21st century."<ref>, Rediff India, Published March 29, 2006</ref> | ||
| ] |
] believes that India is not, and will not become a superpower for the foreseeable future, lagging decades behind China in both development and strategic appetite<ref></ref>. Instead, he believes India will be a key swing state along with Russia. He says that India is “big but not important,” has a highly successful professional class, while ] of its citizens still live in ]. It is “almost completely third world<ref></ref>.” He also writes that it matters that China borders a dozen more countries than India does, is not hemmed in by a vast ocean and the world's tallest mountains, has a loyal diaspora twice the size of India's and enjoys a head start in Asian and African marketplaces<ref></ref>. Khanna asserts that: | ||
| <blockquote>It is not for me to give credit to India; India must earn that credit of which you speak. India faces the largest challenges to development outside of sub-Saharan Africa in terms of its level of poverty, weak infrastructure, and environmental and social stresses. It needs an unprecedented strategy to overcome these, which is not yet in place. I often encourage various aspects of such a strategy among Indian leaders, and hope they will actually implement such a vision. As for “geography of power,” India’s geography is at present geopolitically unfortunate because its ability to project power militarily is blocked by the Himalayan mountains, vast Indian Ocean, and failing states such as Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh, with which it does not have good relations, so it is a very uphill struggle for India to take advantage of its geography between the Persian Gulf and East Asia, but it is trying very hard on both fronts.<ref></ref>.</blockquote> | |||
| Analysts such as Nayar and Paul argue, however, that large numbers of poor are not necessarily a deterrent to India's potential superpower status, given that India has the world's largest educated middle class. Central to their argument is that the acquisition of an independent nuclear capability by India, it's battle tested and ] , ] against regional rival, ], it's ], and ], have already established India as a major ] in ]. They examine prospects and implications of India's integration into the superpower system, and conclude that India is a candidate for a possible future superpower, but that significant systemic and domestic changes will be necessary before it can achieve its goal.<ref>{{cite book | |||
| |last= Raj Nayar | |||
| Some people believe that due to corruption in politics, diversion between the different religions and castes,and other social issues, that India is not a candidate as a potential superpower. <ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7558082.stm</ref> | |||
| |first= Baldev | |||
| |authorlink= Baldev Raj Nayar | |||
| |coauthors= T.V. Paul | |||
| |title= India in the World Order | |||
| |url= http://books.google.com/books?id=0jDobsZatW0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=India+in+the+World+Order&lr=&ei=kwPgSNarKYjcygTf9rGhBA&sig=ACfU3U2MMys4mjD1vdu282kqwvBa9vsJZQ | |||
| |year=2003 | |||
| |publisher= Cambridge University Press | |||
| |language= English | |||
| |isbn=0521528755 | |||
| }}</ref>. Likewise, Ashley Tellis, of the ] and the ], also writes that strategic analysts in India definitely look to a future | |||
| with India as a significant military superpower.<ref>A.J. Tellis, "India's Emerging Nuclear Posture: Between Recessed Deterrent and Ready Arsenal', Published by Rand Corporation, 2001 ISBN 0833027816, 9780833027818</ref> | |||
| China and India rising to superpower status is not inevitable, according to scholars such as Professor Pranab Bardhan, Chief Editor of the ''Journal of Development Economics'', who suggest that millions mired in poverty and ineffective government prevents China or India from rivaling the U.S. or the E.U. any time soon.<ref>, YaleGlobal, Accessed March 11, 2007</ref> | China and India rising to superpower status is not inevitable, according to scholars such as Professor Pranab Bardhan, Chief Editor of the ''Journal of Development Economics'', who suggest that millions mired in poverty and ineffective government prevents China or India from rivaling the U.S. or the E.U. any time soon.<ref>, YaleGlobal, Accessed March 11, 2007</ref> | ||
Revision as of 22:51, 28 September 2008
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Some academics have speculated on nations that are potential superpowers in the 21st century, mentioning several candidates. Whether China, the European Union, India, or Russia, will be future superpowers is a matter of ongoing debate. The most common belief held is that only the United States currently fulfills the criteria to be considered a superpower. It is a matter of debate regarding Russia's status as a possible future superpower. Brazil is considered by some to be a potential great power.
The record of such predictions has not been perfect. For example, in the 1980s some political and economic analysts erroneously predicted that Japan would eventually accede to superpower status, due to its large population, huge GDP, and high economic growth at that time.
China
| People's Republic of China | |||
|---|---|---|---|
 | |||
 |
The People's Republic of China receives continual coverage in the popular press of its potential superpower status, and has been identified as a rising or emerging economic and military superpower by academics and other experts. Professor Shujie Yao of Nottingham University has said "China will overtake the United States to become the world's largest economy by 2038 if current growth rates continue," and that China's GDP will overtake that of Japan by 2017 or 2018, and Germany's by 2008. Professor Yao thinks that "under an optimistic scenario, China could become a real superpower in 30 years' time."
International relations analyst Parag Khanna states that by cutting massive trade and investment deals with Latin America and Africa, China has established its presence as a superpower along with the United States and the European Union. China's rise is demonstrated by its ballooning share of trade in its gross domestic product. He believes that China's consultative style has allowed it to develop political and economic ties with many countries including those viewed as rogue states by the United States. He states that the Shanghai Cooperation Organization founded with Russia and the Central Asian countries may eventually be the "NATO of the East".
Geoffrey Murphay's China: The Next Superpower argues that while the potential for China is high, this is fairly perceived only by looking at the risks and obstacles China faces in managing its population and resources. The political situation in China may become too fragile to survive into superpower status according to Susan Shirk in China: Fragile Superpower. Other factors that could constrain China's ability to become a superpower in the future include: limited supplies of energy and raw materials, questions over its innovation capability, inequality and corruption, and risks to social stability and the environment.
European Union
 | The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (September 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| European Union | |||
|---|---|---|---|
 | |||
 |
The European Union (EU) has been called an emerging superpower by academics. T.R. Reid, Andrew Reding, Mark Leonard and John McCormick, believe that the power of the EU will rival that of the United States in the 21st century. Leonard cites several factors: the EU's large population, large economy, low inflation rates, the unpopularity and perceived failure of US foreign policy in recent years, and certain EU members states' high quality of life (when measured in terms such as hours worked per week).
Parag Khanna believes that the EU and China have achieved superpower status and will rival the power of the United States in the 21st century. He mentions the EU's growing influence at America's expense and an increasing European soft power. He writes that “economic power is more important than military power.” Thus, the competition will be won through “soft power”. He also mentions the large economy of the EU, that European technologies more and more set the global standards and that European countries give the most development assistance. On the fact that the EU lacks a common army, he replies that the EU does not need one. The EU use intelligence and the police to apprehend radical Islamists, social policy to try to integrate restive Muslim populations and economic strength to incorporate the former Soviet Union and gradually subdue Russia. Khanna also writes that South America, east Asia and other regions prefer to emulate the "European Dream" than the American variant. This could possibly be seen in the South American Union and the African Union.
On the other hand Laurent Cohen-Tanugi states that the EU as a whole has consistently suffered from a growth deficit compared to the US, high unemployment, and public deficits even while most member states of the EU lagged substantially behind the US in R&D investment, technological innovation, and, since 1995, productivity gains.
Additionally, it is argued by commentators that full political integration is not required for the European Union to wield international influence: that its apparent weaknesses constitute its real strengths (as of its low profile diplomacy and the obsession with the rule of law) and that the EU represents a new and potentially more successful type of international actor than traditional ones; however, it is uncertain if the effectiveness of such an influence would be equal to that of a politically integrated superpower such as the United States.
Parag Khanna writes that:
It’s a mistake to measure Europe against the coherence that is demanded of a singular unitary nation state. Europe is a different form of entity altogether—it’s a supranational, transnational, postmodern network empire. It’s actually a more appropriate structure for the 21st century than America’s structure is, in a way. They don’t have one army, they have many armies. They don’t have one foreign policy, they have many foreign policies. But can you demonstrate to me that there are areas where what one country does hurts the others rather than eventually helping them? When Italy builds a gas pipeline from Libya, does that hurt Denmark? No. I mean, the energy is going into the common gas market which is being developed. When Germany takes the lead on Russia and Spain takes the lead on Venezuela, is that a bad thing? No, not at all. When the French and the Spanish invest in migration centres in North Africa to create jobs there to diminish illegal immigration into Europe, is that bad for Germany and for Britain? No, it's good for them.
India
| India | |||
|---|---|---|---|
 | |||
 |
Newsweek and the International Herald Tribune join several academics in discussing India's potential of becoming a superpower. With 9.4% GDP growth in 2007, Goldman Sachs predicts that as 700 million Indians are expected to move to cities by 2050, the Indian economy may surpass the United States's (in US$) by 2050.
India's strength lies in its demographics; more than 50% of India's population is under 25. Dr Narendra Jadhav, a principal advisor to the Reserve Bank of India and a former advisor to the executive director at the IMF, says "India has a great potential to become an economic super power because of its growing young population." A young population coupled with the second largest English-speaking population in the world could give India an advantage over China.
Minister Mentor and former Prime Minister of Singapore Lee Kuan Yew believes that
India’s economy can grow to about 60-70 percent that of China. I see that as the long-term trend. They’re not going to be bigger than China - on present projections. But 60-70 percent of China with a population which will be bigger than China by 2050, is something considerable, and they’ve some very able people at the top. I draw this historical lesson which I believe will be repeated, though not in exactly the same way, but will manifest itself in a similar pattern.
On the other hand, Founder and President of the Economic Strategy Institute and former counselor to the Secretary of Commerce in the Reagan Administration Clyde V. Prestowitz Jr. has predicted that "It is going to be India's century. India is going to be the biggest economy in the world. It is going to be the biggest superpower of the 21st century."
Parag Khanna believes that India is not, and will not become a superpower for the foreseeable future, lagging decades behind China in both development and strategic appetite. Instead, he believes India will be a key swing state along with Russia. He says that India is “big but not important,” has a highly successful professional class, while millions of its citizens still live in poverty. It is “almost completely third world.” He also writes that it matters that China borders a dozen more countries than India does, is not hemmed in by a vast ocean and the world's tallest mountains, has a loyal diaspora twice the size of India's and enjoys a head start in Asian and African marketplaces. Khanna asserts that:
It is not for me to give credit to India; India must earn that credit of which you speak. India faces the largest challenges to development outside of sub-Saharan Africa in terms of its level of poverty, weak infrastructure, and environmental and social stresses. It needs an unprecedented strategy to overcome these, which is not yet in place. I often encourage various aspects of such a strategy among Indian leaders, and hope they will actually implement such a vision. As for “geography of power,” India’s geography is at present geopolitically unfortunate because its ability to project power militarily is blocked by the Himalayan mountains, vast Indian Ocean, and failing states such as Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh, with which it does not have good relations, so it is a very uphill struggle for India to take advantage of its geography between the Persian Gulf and East Asia, but it is trying very hard on both fronts..
Some people believe that due to corruption in politics, diversion between the different religions and castes,and other social issues, that India is not a candidate as a potential superpower.
China and India rising to superpower status is not inevitable, according to scholars such as Professor Pranab Bardhan, Chief Editor of the Journal of Development Economics, who suggest that millions mired in poverty and ineffective government prevents China or India from rivaling the U.S. or the E.U. any time soon.
Russia
| Russia | |||
|---|---|---|---|
 | |||
 |
Russia has been suggested by some as a potential candidate for resuming superpower status in the twenty-first century due to its fast-growing economy, energy superpower status and the size of its military. According to Steven Rosefielde of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Russia intends to "reemerge as a full-fledged superpower," and "contrary to conventional wisdom, this goal is easily within the Kremlin’s grasp, but the cost to the Russian people and global security would be immense" . Rosefielde further argues that "Russia has an intact military-industrial complex... and the mineral wealth to reactivate its dormant structurally militarized potential," and that "supply-side constraints don’t preclude a return to prodigal superpowerdom".
Alexander Golts of the St. Petersburg Times argues that Putin's confrontations with the US on nuclear issues are in pursuit of regaining superpower status for Russia. In a more recent report by ABC News, a senior U.S. official asserted that "Russia is once again indisputably the number two military power in the world, second only to the United States". Mike Ritchie of industry analysts Energy Intelligence says "Russia was always a superpower that used its energy to win friends and influence among its former Soviet satellites. Nothing has really changed much. They are back in the same game, winning friends and influencing people and using their power to do so." Russia is often considered to be an energy superpower and a nuclear superpower due to its vast amounts of natural resources and large nuclear arsenal mostly leftover from the former Soviet Union.
There are significant obstacles to Russia gaining superpower status. In recent years Russia's sphere of influence significantly shrunk owing in part to gains by the EU and NATO. Russia's currently shrinking and aging population is a major problem for the country. In addition, Russia is currently only the eleventh largest economy in the world by nominal GDP, and by this parameter is approximately twelve times smaller than the US economy. Russia is heavily reliant on resource extraction, especially fossil fuels, for its economy. .
See also
References
- Country profile: United States of America, BBC News, Accessed July 22, 2008
- "Analyzing American Power in the Post-Cold War Era". Retrieved 2007-02-28.
- Lague, D (2007) China builds a superpower fighter, International Herald Tribune
- ^ Guttman, R.J. (2001) Europe in the New Century, Lynne Rienner Publishers
- ^ India Rising | Newsweek International | Newsweek.com
- Hill, F (2002) Russia: The 21st Century's Energy Superpower?, Brookings Institution
- Rosefielde, S (2004) Russia in the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press
- Associated Press Booming Brazil could be world power soon, msnbc
- "Great Powers". Encarta Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-05-16.
{{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=(help) - Greenwald, J (1988) Japan From Superrich To Superpower, TIME
- Visions of China, CNN Specials, Accessed March 11, 2007
- China builds a superpower fighter, IHT, Accessed March 11, 2007
- US-China Institute :: news & features :: china as a global power
- www.carnegieendowment.org
- www.getabstract.com
- www.au.af.mil
- China to become world’s largest economy by 2038, Nottingham professor says, School of Contemporary Chinese Studies, University of Nottingham
- Waving Goodbye to Hegemony (PARAG KHANNA)
- China: Fragile Superpower, Description, Oxford University Press, Accessed March 11, 2007
- www.nottingham.ac.uk
- Wilson Center The EU Future: Global Power or European Governance?, Wilson Center
- Reid, T.R. (2004) The United States of Europe 305p, Penguin Books ISBN 1594200335
- Reding, A (2002) EU in position to be world’s next superpower, Chicago Tribune
- Leonard, M (2006) Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century, Perseus Books Group ISBN 1586484249
- McCormick J.The European Superpower
- Leonard, M (2005) Europe: the new superpower, Irish Times
- ^ Khanna P.Waving Goodbye to Hegemony, New York Times Magazine
- Khanna P.Guess Who's Coming to Power
- Khanna P.
- Cohen-Tanugi, L., "The End of Europe" in Foreign Affairs, 84, (2005), 6, 55-67.
- Leonard, M (2005) The Project for a New European Century, The Globalist
- Hyde-Price A (2004) The EU, Power and Coercion: From 'Civilian' to 'Civilising' Power Arena
- Khanna P.
- India welcomed as new sort of superpower, IHT, Accessed March 11, 2007
- India: Emerging as Eastern or Western Power?, YaleGlobal, Accessed March 11, 2007
- At 9.4%, GDP growth second fastest-ever
- ^ http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/24/business/rupee.php
- Advantage India: Growing young population
- , The Rise of India, ABC News
- , International Herald Tribune, Published August 29, 2007
- , Rediff India, Published March 29, 2006
- Waving Goodbye to Hegemony
- We’re #1? Tell China
- The Rise of Non-Americanism
- Interview with Media Global
- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7558082.stm
- India Superpower? Not so Fast!, YaleGlobal, Accessed March 11, 2007
- Rosefielde 2005:1
- Rosefielde 2005:9
- St. Petersburg Times: "Dreaming of New Conflicts"
- Rice: Russia's Military Moves 'a Problem' ABC News Oct. 14, 2007
- Russia: A superpower rises again
- Goldman, Marshall I. (October 11, 2006). "Behold the new energy superpower". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 2007-10-08.
- Chance, Matthew (Junde 27, 2007). "Eye on Russia: Russia's resurgence". Cable News Network. Retrieved 2007-10-08.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - "Russia: A superpower rises again". Retrieved 2006-06-10.
- BBC NEWS | World | Europe | Russia faces demographic disaster
- ^ Russia, Population, Demographic Crisis - JRL 4-28-05
- Russia is falling apart. It is slowly populated by Chinese, political expert Zherebetsky warns
- Russia Called Too Reliant on Petroleum - New York Times