| Revision as of 07:30, 26 September 2008 editGeo Swan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,843 edits →Could you please explain more fully...: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:34, 29 September 2008 edit undoNirvana888 (talk | contribs)Rollbackers3,882 editsm →Edit warNext edit → | ||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| I put considerable effort in adding the reference If you think you have a legitimate concern with the material please discuss it on the talk page before you try to snip it again. ] (]) 07:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC) | I put considerable effort in adding the reference If you think you have a legitimate concern with the material please discuss it on the talk page before you try to snip it again. ] (]) 07:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Potential superpowers == | |||
| Ha! You're one to talk buddy given your reputation of repeated edit warring. Please understand that you have to obtain consensus before making unilateral changes. You have just deleted sourced material and inserted your own POV. ] (]) 22:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit war == | |||
| {{uw-3rr}} ] (]) 22:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : Good luck with that my friend especially given the fact that you have already broken 3RR and engaged in disruptive edits without building any consensus whatsoever. ] (]) 00:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:34, 29 September 2008
previous posts are located here:
Block
--Tznkai (talk) 04:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
unblock request
Goingoveredge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The details of the edit-warring by Khalistani trolls are provided in the WP:3RR report . Note that, after my 3rd revert, the subsequent reverts were undoing the vandalism of User:Roadahead rather than the content dispute of the first 3 reverts. The vandalism was the removal of "OR" tags by User:Roadahead without discussion . Since vandalism reverts are not covered under WP:3RR, the reverts that involve content disputes by me amount to only 3, not more. Therefore, I did not violate 3rr rule. In case that the reviewing admin disagrees with my analysis and declines this request, I would like to request the admin to monitor edits of User:Princhest, User:Roadaheads Khalistani revisionist meatpuppet. Both these accounts (note their contribs here, and here), are WP:SPA meatpuppets consistently editing Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity in tandem to promote a fringe, revisionist agenda that involves some intense political lobbying by the revisionist trolls (see Gurmit Singh Aulakh). It is entirely likely that User:Princhest will re-appear to continue revert-warring. I suggest page protection.
Decline reason:
First off, you have in fact been edit warring even if you technically have not violated 3RR. Second, removing a tag from a page is not vandalism and should not be reverted as such. And third, you need to address your actions, not the actions of others. Take a look at out guide to requesting unblocks — Tiptoety 04:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Goingoveredge (talk) 04:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Time. Goingoveredge (talk) 00:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Undoing edit
Ok, I undid the edit to your talk page, I thought I had undid that, but I guess not. If you need anything else, please let me know. TylerPuetz (/c) 05:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
You were blocked just yesterday for 24 hours for edit warring on Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity, and yet, here you are, edit warring again. I have opened a discussion at WP:ANI. Corvus cornixtalk 07:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Blocked for 48 hours per AN/I. -- fayssal / Wiki me up® 07:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Seems to be a bit unfair, given that User:Princhest, User:Roadaheads meatpuppet, just "happened" to drop by and started revert-warring in the same article, as he has done so countless times in the past, and walks away scot-free. It seems that meatpuppetry and racist trolling (as done by User:Roadahead and User:Princhest works on wikipedia provided the racist trolls are determined enough.Goingoveredge (talk) 07:41, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Under the microscope as well. -- fayssal / Wiki me up® 08:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring
Your page is full of blocks and yet both of you are busy reverting each other. Such edit wars are not welcome on Misplaced Pages. There are various methods of dispute resolution available. Adopt the appropriate ones and be done with it else more and longer blocks will soon be coming — Lost 16:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Please see Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Goingoveredge_again. Corvus cornixtalk 22:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Could you please explain more fully...
I put considerable effort in adding the reference you keep snipping. If you think you have a legitimate concern with the material please discuss it on the talk page before you try to snip it again. Geo Swan (talk) 07:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Potential superpowers
Ha! You're one to talk buddy given your reputation of repeated edit warring. Please understand that you have to obtain consensus before making unilateral changes. You have just deleted sourced material and inserted your own POV. Nirvana888 (talk) 22:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Edit war
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nirvana888 (talk) 22:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- Good luck with that my friend especially given the fact that you have already broken 3RR and engaged in disruptive edits without building any consensus whatsoever. Nirvana888 (talk) 00:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)