| Revision as of 13:04, 6 October 2008 editArcayne (talk | contribs)Rollbackers26,574 edits →DYK for I'm a PC: cm x2← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:29, 6 October 2008 edit undoRyan Postlethwaite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,432 edits →I'm a PC: cNext edit → | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
| Hello Arcayne. You seem to have a few ownership issues with the above page. I made one revert to remove the information about scrubbing which was well supported by the talk page in the lead, yet you reverted (I'm going to revert that again because what you've done is completely against consensus). I also note you've done this for basically anything you don't agree with. As it happens, you've hit three reverts in the last 24 hours so please don't revert again or you'll be blocked. ''']<sup>See ] or ]</sup>''' 08:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | Hello Arcayne. You seem to have a few ownership issues with the above page. I made one revert to remove the information about scrubbing which was well supported by the talk page in the lead, yet you reverted (I'm going to revert that again because what you've done is completely against consensus). I also note you've done this for basically anything you don't agree with. As it happens, you've hit three reverts in the last 24 hours so please don't revert again or you'll be blocked. ''']<sup>See ] or ]</sup>''' 08:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :The problem is the undue weight given to it. I'm nore than happy for it to be in the critisism section, but the second mention in the lead pushes it over the line into unacceptable undue weight in my opinion. The ] guideline would suggest it might be ok to add it in, however the consensus on the talk page is that this would go against ]. As you're aware, WP:UNDUE comes from ] which is one of Misplaced Pages's core policies. In this case, the undue (and therefore NPOV) concerns fair outweigh that of inclusion based on WP:LEAD. That's my opinion and take on it anyway and I hope it helps explain my position. ''']<sup>See ] or ]</sup>''' 16:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:29, 6 October 2008
Out for the evening
yes, I will begin anew the morn with a big bright smile and a fresh happy stride.
 | This user values third opinions and occasionally provides one. |
 | Caveat This user reserves the right to be more fun than you. |
Friday 27 December04:19 UTC
What was archivedTell the truth...Yeah, tell the truth...you really are cutting out to watch Survivor...8^D, the VP debate isn't until they vote someone off. Goes off at 9 eastern right?. Time to go make dinner and then watch these folks starve. At least on Survivor, you get to hear the conniving thoughts from the individuals in confession! Have a good evening Arcayne, ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 23:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
HeyoHeyo, I've made another small edit which I hope is uncontested based on the previous comments. See my reply on the talk page and let's address the points we're concerned about. Cheers, Jaakobou 17:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC) DYK for I'm a PC
Actually, it was the other commentators over at the talk page who were imputing bad faith, not me ... I hadn't been aware of the long disagreements over this, and had I not jumped to the bottom of the page I might have ignored it. Although, I did feel too many "how ironic!" quotes were included, when MS's response makes the same point that the Economist made when it reported on MS's signing of Crispin ... that of course the ad agency was going to put the ads together on Macs; that's all most of them have. I have no objections to the article including stuff about the data being erased; that's notable and not the first time MS created bad publicity for itself by trying to conceal things like that. (If Microsoft really wants to stick it in Apple's ear, they should have done it in the portable-MP3-player segment, where they could easily take advantage of the Zune's underappreciated advantages over the iPod: They could have the same white backdrop, two guys come out, one in a black turtleneck and pants, the other in a T-shirt and jeans: "Hi, I'm an iPod" "And I'm a Zune", then a bunch of short sketches highlighting the Zune's advantages (FM radio; wireless syncing) and the iPod's disadvantages (iTunes' increasing tendency to bloatware, the lack of long-term physical durability of an iPod). They've got a brand idenitity all waiting there for them that's the reverse of the dynamic in the personal-computing market; using Apple's trope would not only take advantage of this but show Apple that they're not always the cool alternative they're pitching themselves as. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
I'm a PCHello Arcayne. You seem to have a few ownership issues with the above page. I made one revert to remove the information about scrubbing which was well supported by the talk page in the lead, yet you reverted (I'm going to revert that again because what you've done is completely against consensus). I also note you've done this for basically anything you don't agree with. As it happens, you've hit three reverts in the last 24 hours so please don't revert again or you'll be blocked. Ryan Postlethwaite 08:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
|
||||||||
