| Revision as of 19:54, 29 September 2005 view sourceO^O (talk | contribs)1,681 editsm declatory -> declarative← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:59, 30 September 2005 view source Rivarez (talk | contribs)192 edits restore NPOV and factual correctionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| :''For other meanings see ].'' | :''For other meanings see ].'' | ||
| {|align=right | |||
| {{Sealand table}} | |||
| |align=center| | |||
| ⚫ | The '''Principality of Sealand''' is a ] ( |
||
| ] | |||
| |align=center| | |||
| ] | |||
| |- | |||
| |align=center|]||align=center|] | |||
| |- | |||
| |colspan=2 align=center|] | |||
| |- | |||
| |colspan=2 align=center|Rough Sands, location of Sealand | |||
| |- | |||
| |colspan=2 align=center| | |||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| |} | |||
| ⚫ | The '''Principality of Sealand''' is a ] (i.e. a self-declared, unrecognised ]-like entity) that claims as its territory ], a derelict man-made structure located in the ] six miles (10 km) off the coast of ], ], at {{coor dms|51|53|40|N|1|28|57|E|}}. It is occupied by the family and associates of ]. The population of the facility rarely exceeds five, and its inhabitable area is 550 ]. | ||
| ⚫ | Sealand is undoubtedly the world's best-known micronation, and although its claims to sovereignty and legitimacy are generally not taken seriously, it is nevertheless sometimes cited in debates as an interesting case study of how various principles of international law can be applied to a disputed territory. | ||
| Sealand is occupied by the family and associates of ]. The population of the facility rarely exceeds five, and its inhabitable area is 550 ]. | |||
| ⚫ | Sealand is undoubtedly the world's best-known micronation, and it is sometimes cited in debates as an interesting case study of how various principles of international law can be applied to a disputed territory. | ||
| == History == | == History == | ||
| In ] during ], ] ''''']''''' was constructed |
In ] during ], ] ''''']''''' was constructed in the UK as one of the ]. It comprised a floating ] with a superstructure of two ]s joined by a deck upon which other structures could be added. The barge was towed to a position above ] sandbar where its hold was intentionally flooded so that the hulk sank to a resting place on the sandbar. The structure now visible above the waterline is the superstructure of the vessel. | ||
| ⚫ | The facility (termed '''Roughs Tower''') was occupied by 150-300 ] personnel throughout World War II; however, after the war all personnel were evacuated and HMS ''Fort Rough'' was |
||
| ⚫ | The facility (termed '''Roughs Tower''') was occupied by 150-300 ] personnel throughout World War II; however, after the war all personnel were evacuated and HMS ''Fort Rough'' was left derelict. | ||
| ⚫ | On September 2, ], the fort was occupied by Paddy Roy Bates, a ] subject and ] broadcaster, who ejected a competing group of pirate broadcasters and claimed sovereignty on the basis of his interpretation of international law (see ]). | ||
| ⚫ | On September 2, ], the fort was occupied by Paddy Roy Bates, a ] subject and ] broadcaster, who ejected a competing group of pirate broadcasters and claimed sovereignty on the basis of his interpretation of international law (see ]). | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| In ], Roy's son Michael Bates was summoned to court as a result of an incident during which shots were fired at a British navy vessel in the vicinity of Sealand. According to some reports the vessel's occupants were intending to evict Bates from the fortress, while others state that they were simply attempting to repair a nearby navigation buoy. In delivering its decision on November 25, 1968, the court stated that because the incident occurred outside British territorial waters, the court possessed no jurisdiction to rule on the matter. | In ], Roy's son Michael Bates was summoned to court as a result of an incident during which shots were fired at a British navy vessel in the vicinity of Sealand. According to some reports the vessel's occupants were intending to evict Bates from the fortress, while others state that they were simply attempting to repair a nearby navigation buoy. In delivering its decision on November 25, 1968, the court stated that because the incident occurred outside British territorial waters, the court possessed no jurisdiction to rule on the matter. | ||
| In ], while Bates was away, the "Prime Minister" he had appointed, |
In ], while Bates was away, the "Prime Minister" he had appointed, Alexander G. Achenbach, and several German and ] citizens staged a forcible takeover of ], holding Bates' son Michael captive, before releasing him several days later in the Netherlands. | ||
| Bates thereupon enlisted armed assistance and, in a helicopter assault, retook the fortress. He then held the invaders captive, claiming them as ]. Most participants in the invasion were repatriated at the cessation of the "war" |
Bates thereupon enlisted armed assistance and, in a helicopter assault, retook the fortress. He then held the invaders captive, claiming them as ]. Most participants in the invasion were repatriated at the cessation of the "war", but Gernot Pütz, a ] lawyer, was charged with ] against Sealand and was held unless he paid DM 75,000 (more than £18,000). The governments of the Netherlands and Germany petitioned the British government for his release, but the United Kingdom disavowed all responsibility, citing the 1968 court decision. | ||
| Germany then sent a diplomat from its London embassy to Roughs Tower to negotiate for Pütz's release, and after several weeks Roy Bates relented, subsequently claiming that the diplomat's visit constituted ''de facto'' recognition of Sealand by Germany. (Germany has |
Germany then sent a diplomat from its London embassy to Roughs Tower to negotiate for Pütz's release, and after several weeks Roy Bates relented, subsequently claiming that the diplomat's visit constituted ''de facto'' recognition of Sealand by Germany. (Germany has not confirmed this interpretation.) | ||
| After this incident, Achenbach established an "]" in Germany, in opposition to Roy Bates, assuming the title of "Chairman of the Privy Council". Upon Achenbach's resignation for health reasons in August ], the rebel government's "Minister for Economic Co-operation", Johannes Seiger, assumed control, with the position of "Prime Minister and Chairman of the Privy Council". Seiger continues to claim that he is Sealand's legitimate ruling authority. | |||
| Sealand has claimed the waters surrounding Roughs Tower to the extent of twelve nautical miles , and it has claimed to have physically defended this claim on at least one occasion. In an incident in ], the Royal Maritime Auxiliary vessel ''Golden Eye'' was fired upon from Sealand. | Sealand has claimed the waters surrounding Roughs Tower to the same extent of twelve nautical miles , and it has claimed to have physically defended this claim on at least one occasion. In an incident in ], the Royal Maritime Auxiliary vessel ''Golden Eye'' was fired upon from Sealand. | ||
| For a period, Sealand ]s were mass-manufactured and sold widely (mostly to ]ans) by a ]-based group believed to be associated with the exile government under Seiger. These passports, which were not authorised by the Bates family, were involved in several high-profile crimes, including the murder of ]. Due to the massive quantity in circulation (estimated at 150,000), in ] the Bates family revoked all of the Sealand passports that they themselves had issued in the previous thirty years. | For a period, Sealand ]s were mass-manufactured and sold widely (mostly to ]ans) by a ]-based group believed to be associated with the exile government under Seiger. These passports, which were not authorised by the Bates family, were involved in several high-profile crimes, including the murder of ]. Due to the massive quantity in circulation (estimated at 150,000), in ] the Bates family revoked all of the Sealand passports that they themselves had issued in the previous thirty years. | ||
| == Legal status == | == Legal status == | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Sealand's claim that it is an independent state is founded on the following two propositions: | Sealand's claim that it is an independent state is founded on the following two propositions: | ||
| Line 39: | Line 49: | ||
| #The interactions of the UK government and of other governments – specifically the government of ] – with Sealand constitute '']'' recognition. Sealand claims de facto legitimacy on this basis. | #The interactions of the UK government and of other governments – specifically the government of ] – with Sealand constitute '']'' recognition. Sealand claims de facto legitimacy on this basis. | ||
| ⚫ | One set of criteria for statehood under international law is defined by the ]. This asserts that a defined territory, permanent population, government and the capacity to enter into relationships with other sovereign states are the only foundation requirements for a sovereign state. None of these requirements necessarily has to conform to a certain size or standard, but their general characteristics should be taken into account. | ||
| In ], the two most common schools of thought for the creation of statehood are the ] and ] theories of state creation. The constitutive theory was the standard nineteenth century model of statehood, and the declatory theory was developed in the twentieth century to address shortcomings of the constitutive theory. | |||
| Another alternative legal argument against Sealand's statehood claims exists in the ], a theory widely but not universally accepted in international law. This states that recognition by other states is the most important condition for statehood. Since no other state explicitly recognises the existence of the Principality of Sealand, Sealand is not a state under this theory's criteria. | |||
| In the constitutive theory, a state exists exclusively via recognition by other states. The theory splits on whether this recognition requires "diplomatic recognition" or merely "recognition of existence". It is clear that no other state grants Sealand diplomatic recognition, but it has been argued by Bates that negotiations carried out by Germany constituted "recognition of existence". | |||
| In the declatory theory of statehood, an entity becomes a state as soon as it meets the minimal criteria for statehood. Recognition by other states is purely "declatory". | |||
| ⚫ | One set of criteria for statehood under international law is defined by the ]. This asserts that a defined territory, permanent population, government and the capacity to enter into relationships with other sovereign states are the only foundation requirements for a sovereign state. None of these requirements necessarily has to conform to a certain size or standard, but their general characteristics should be taken into account. | ||
| Constitutive theory involves "recognition of existence" as opposed to "diplomatic recognition". For example, until recently ] was not recognised diplomatically by the UK, but was acknowledged to exist, because the UK government undertook special measures to protect its citizens in that state and did not accept that any other state had sovereignty over the territory administered by Libya. | |||
| Another similar set of criteria for statehood are found in the ] ]. The committee found that a state was defined by having a territory, a population, and a political authority. The committee also found that the existence and disappearance of states was a question of fact, while the recognition by other states was purely declaratory. | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| Since the 1968 UK court decision, the United Kingdom has extended its territorial sea to twelve nautical miles (22 km), which it had the legal right to do under international law since ]. These and subsequent laws have dealt with the construction and legal position of ]s. However, as Roughs Tower is actually a sunken ship, it is not covered by these rulings. | Since the 1968 UK court decision, the United Kingdom has extended its territorial sea to twelve nautical miles (22 km), which it had the legal right to do under international law since ]. These and subsequent laws have dealt with the construction and legal position of ]s. However, as Roughs Tower is actually a sunken ship, it is not covered by these rulings. | ||
| Line 55: | Line 61: | ||
| According to the ] ], there is no transitional law and no possibility to consent to the existence of a construction which was previously approved or built by a neighbouring state. This means that artificial islands may no longer be constructed and then claimed as sovereign states, or as state territories, for the purposes of extension of an exclusive economic zone or of territorial waters. However, since Roughs Tower is not an artificial island but a sunken ship, it would be necessary for Her Majesty's Crown Estate (which owns the land itself under the tower) to act as the complainant landlord in order to get the wreck removed from its property. | According to the ] ], there is no transitional law and no possibility to consent to the existence of a construction which was previously approved or built by a neighbouring state. This means that artificial islands may no longer be constructed and then claimed as sovereign states, or as state territories, for the purposes of extension of an exclusive economic zone or of territorial waters. However, since Roughs Tower is not an artificial island but a sunken ship, it would be necessary for Her Majesty's Crown Estate (which owns the land itself under the tower) to act as the complainant landlord in order to get the wreck removed from its property. | ||
| Although the UK has publicly asserted its authority over Roughs Tower , it appears to be government policy to refrain from comment or action except when forced. British Government documents, now available to the public under the 30 year expiry of confidentiality, show that the UK drafted plans to |
Although the UK has publicly asserted its authority over Roughs Tower , it appears to be government policy to refrain from comment or action except when forced. British Government documents, now available to the public under the 30 year expiry of confidentiality, show that the UK drafted plans to retake the fortress, but such plans were not implemented by the then ] due to the potential for loss of life, and the creation of a legal and public relations disaster. | ||
| == The Bates family == | == The Bates family == | ||
| Line 67: | Line 73: | ||
| Sealand possesses a simple constitution, instituted in ], which consists of a preamble and seven articles. The preamble asserts Sealand's independence, while the articles variously deal with the Sealand's status as a constitutional monarchy, the empowerment of government bureaux, the role of an appointed, advisory Senate, the functions of an appointed, advisory legal tribunal, a proscription against the bearing of arms except by members of a designated "Sealand Guard", the exclusive right of the sovereign to formulate foreign policy and alter the constitution, and the hereditary ] succession of the monarchy. | Sealand possesses a simple constitution, instituted in ], which consists of a preamble and seven articles. The preamble asserts Sealand's independence, while the articles variously deal with the Sealand's status as a constitutional monarchy, the empowerment of government bureaux, the role of an appointed, advisory Senate, the functions of an appointed, advisory legal tribunal, a proscription against the bearing of arms except by members of a designated "Sealand Guard", the exclusive right of the sovereign to formulate foreign policy and alter the constitution, and the hereditary ] succession of the monarchy. | ||
| Current Sealand government |
Current Sealand government bureaus are: the Bureau of ], the Bureau of Internal Affairs, and the Bureau of ] ] and ]. Most of the organs of Sealand's government are apparently either inactive or operate outside of Sealand's territory itself. A Sealand State Corporation was chartered by Roy Bates and charged with the "development of the state" shortly after Sealand's foundation, but its current status and range of activities, if any, are unknown. | ||
| In the year ] worldwide publicity was created about Sealand due to the establishment of a new entity called ], a ], which effectively took control of Rough Tower itself. According to the Sealand official website, no other visitors or activities would be permitted . The original claim to the right to occupy Roughs Tower was maintained by Michael Bates, whose father Roy has removed himself to a great extent from further daily involvement. | In the year ] worldwide publicity was created about Sealand due to the establishment of a new entity called ], a ], which effectively took control of Rough Tower itself. According to the Sealand official website, no other visitors or activities would be permitted . The original claim to the right to occupy Roughs Tower was maintained by Michael Bates, whose father Roy has removed himself to a great extent from further daily involvement. | ||
| Line 91: | Line 97: | ||
| Sealand first issued ]s in 1969, when a helicopter service was instituted to carry mail between Roughs Tower and ], ]. A significant volume of mail carrying Sealand stamps and postmarks was accepted without surcharge and passed by Belgian postal authorities into the international postal system at this time, which seems to indicate that a formal arrangement of some sort existed between them and Sealand. | Sealand first issued ]s in 1969, when a helicopter service was instituted to carry mail between Roughs Tower and ], ]. A significant volume of mail carrying Sealand stamps and postmarks was accepted without surcharge and passed by Belgian postal authorities into the international postal system at this time, which seems to indicate that a formal arrangement of some sort existed between them and Sealand. | ||
| Although few stamp issues have been made since |
Although few stamp issues have been made since the 1960s, Sealand postage stamps and postal ]s continue to be used on most if not all mail from the principality, although the actual volume of such mail is believed to be limited. | ||
| The official policy of the United Kingdom's ] is to stamp envelopes not bearing UK stamps with a 'revenue protection' cancellation, meaning that postal carriage charges may be claimed from the recipient – although recent examples exist of mail bearing Sealand stamps and cancellations, to the exclusion of all others, being transmitted through the international postal system. | The official policy of the United Kingdom's ] is to stamp envelopes not bearing UK stamps with a 'revenue protection' cancellation, meaning that postal carriage charges may be claimed from the recipient – although recent examples exist of mail bearing Sealand stamps and cancellations, to the exclusion of all others, being transmitted through the international postal system. | ||
| Line 104: | Line 110: | ||
| ==Wind Farms== | ==Wind Farms== | ||
| Sealand may soon have some new ]s - several ] ]s are proposed to be built nearby. It is thought that any such ]s would not require the British government to interact with Sealand in any fashion, however there may be scope for challenges over usage of sea rights over the different claims of UK and Sealand territorial waters. | Sealand may soon have some new ]s - several ] ]s are proposed to be built nearby. It is thought that any such ]s would not require the British government to interact with Sealand in any fashion, however there may be scope for challenges over usage of sea rights over the different claims of UK and Sealand territorial waters. | ||
| == References == | == References == | ||
| Line 113: | Line 119: | ||
| * "Stop signs on the web; The battle between freedom and regulation on the Internet", '']'', Jan 13, 2001 p1 | * "Stop signs on the web; The battle between freedom and regulation on the Internet", '']'', Jan 13, 2001 p1 | ||
| * - a News.com article from ], 2003. | * - a News.com article from ], 2003. | ||
| * photographs and article by Kim Gilmour, ''Internet Magazine,'' August 2002. | |||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
| Line 137: | Line 142: | ||
| * - More Photos inside and out. | * - More Photos inside and out. | ||
| * - ]'s account of how Sealand inspired him to declare his flat independent from the ] | * - ]'s account of how Sealand inspired him to declare his flat independent from the ] | ||
| * – Administrative Court of Cologne, Germany, May 3, 1978 | * – Administrative Court of Cologne, Germany, May 3, 1978 | ||
| * - "E Mare Libertas" Sealand Documentary Film | * - "E Mare Libertas" Sealand Documentary Film | ||
| * - Official website of Darren Blackburn - Sealand's first and only official athlete | * - Official website of Darren Blackburn - Sealand's first and only official athlete | ||
| * photographs and article by Kim Gilmour, ''Internet Magazine,'' August 2002 | * photographs and article by Kim Gilmour, ''Internet Magazine,'' August 2002 | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 03:59, 30 September 2005
- For other meanings see Sealand (disambiguation).
| Coat of arms | Flag |
| |
| Rough Sands, location of Sealand | |
|
| |
The Principality of Sealand is a micronation (i.e. a self-declared, unrecognised state-like entity) that claims as its territory Roughs Tower, a derelict man-made structure located in the North Sea six miles (10 km) off the coast of Essex, United Kingdom, at 51°53′40″N 1°28′57″E / 51.89444°N 1.48250°E / 51.89444; 1.48250. It is occupied by the family and associates of Paddy Roy Bates. The population of the facility rarely exceeds five, and its inhabitable area is 550 m².
Sealand is undoubtedly the world's best-known micronation, and although its claims to sovereignty and legitimacy are generally not taken seriously, it is nevertheless sometimes cited in debates as an interesting case study of how various principles of international law can be applied to a disputed territory.
History
In 1942 during World War II, HMS Fort Rough was constructed in the UK as one of the Maunsell Sea Forts. It comprised a floating barge with a superstructure of two towers joined by a deck upon which other structures could be added. The barge was towed to a position above Rough Sands sandbar where its hold was intentionally flooded so that the hulk sank to a resting place on the sandbar. The structure now visible above the waterline is the superstructure of the vessel.
The facility (termed Roughs Tower) was occupied by 150-300 Royal Navy personnel throughout World War II; however, after the war all personnel were evacuated and HMS Fort Rough was left derelict.
On September 2, 1967, the fort was occupied by Paddy Roy Bates, a British subject and pirate-radio broadcaster, who ejected a competing group of pirate broadcasters and claimed sovereignty on the basis of his interpretation of international law (see Legal status).
In 1968, Roy's son Michael Bates was summoned to court as a result of an incident during which shots were fired at a British navy vessel in the vicinity of Sealand. According to some reports the vessel's occupants were intending to evict Bates from the fortress, while others state that they were simply attempting to repair a nearby navigation buoy. In delivering its decision on November 25, 1968, the court stated that because the incident occurred outside British territorial waters, the court possessed no jurisdiction to rule on the matter.
In 1978, while Bates was away, the "Prime Minister" he had appointed, Alexander G. Achenbach, and several German and Dutch citizens staged a forcible takeover of Roughs Tower, holding Bates' son Michael captive, before releasing him several days later in the Netherlands.
Bates thereupon enlisted armed assistance and, in a helicopter assault, retook the fortress. He then held the invaders captive, claiming them as prisoners of war. Most participants in the invasion were repatriated at the cessation of the "war", but Gernot Pütz, a German lawyer, was charged with treason against Sealand and was held unless he paid DM 75,000 (more than £18,000). The governments of the Netherlands and Germany petitioned the British government for his release, but the United Kingdom disavowed all responsibility, citing the 1968 court decision.
Germany then sent a diplomat from its London embassy to Roughs Tower to negotiate for Pütz's release, and after several weeks Roy Bates relented, subsequently claiming that the diplomat's visit constituted de facto recognition of Sealand by Germany. (Germany has not confirmed this interpretation.)
After this incident, Achenbach established an "exile government" in Germany, in opposition to Roy Bates, assuming the title of "Chairman of the Privy Council". Upon Achenbach's resignation for health reasons in August 1989, the rebel government's "Minister for Economic Co-operation", Johannes Seiger, assumed control, with the position of "Prime Minister and Chairman of the Privy Council". Seiger continues to claim that he is Sealand's legitimate ruling authority.
Sealand has claimed the waters surrounding Roughs Tower to the same extent of twelve nautical miles , and it has claimed to have physically defended this claim on at least one occasion. In an incident in 1990, the Royal Maritime Auxiliary vessel Golden Eye was fired upon from Sealand.
For a period, Sealand passports were mass-manufactured and sold widely (mostly to Eastern Europeans) by a Spanish-based group believed to be associated with the exile government under Seiger. These passports, which were not authorised by the Bates family, were involved in several high-profile crimes, including the murder of Gianni Versace. Due to the massive quantity in circulation (estimated at 150,000), in 1997 the Bates family revoked all of the Sealand passports that they themselves had issued in the previous thirty years.
Legal status
Sealand's claim that it is an independent state is founded on the following two propositions:
- When Paddy Roy Bates and his associates occupied Roughs Tower in 1967 it was located in international waters, outside the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom and all other sovereign states. Sealand claims de jure legitimacy on this basis.
- The interactions of the UK government and of other governments – specifically the government of Germany – with Sealand constitute de facto recognition. Sealand claims de facto legitimacy on this basis.
One set of criteria for statehood under international law is defined by the Montevideo Convention. This asserts that a defined territory, permanent population, government and the capacity to enter into relationships with other sovereign states are the only foundation requirements for a sovereign state. None of these requirements necessarily has to conform to a certain size or standard, but their general characteristics should be taken into account.
Another alternative legal argument against Sealand's statehood claims exists in the constitutive theory, a theory widely but not universally accepted in international law. This states that recognition by other states is the most important condition for statehood. Since no other state explicitly recognises the existence of the Principality of Sealand, Sealand is not a state under this theory's criteria.
Constitutive theory involves "recognition of existence" as opposed to "diplomatic recognition". For example, until recently Libya was not recognised diplomatically by the UK, but was acknowledged to exist, because the UK government undertook special measures to protect its citizens in that state and did not accept that any other state had sovereignty over the territory administered by Libya.
Since the 1968 UK court decision, the United Kingdom has extended its territorial sea to twelve nautical miles (22 km), which it had the legal right to do under international law since 1958. These and subsequent laws have dealt with the construction and legal position of artificial islands. However, as Roughs Tower is actually a sunken ship, it is not covered by these rulings.
According to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, there is no transitional law and no possibility to consent to the existence of a construction which was previously approved or built by a neighbouring state. This means that artificial islands may no longer be constructed and then claimed as sovereign states, or as state territories, for the purposes of extension of an exclusive economic zone or of territorial waters. However, since Roughs Tower is not an artificial island but a sunken ship, it would be necessary for Her Majesty's Crown Estate (which owns the land itself under the tower) to act as the complainant landlord in order to get the wreck removed from its property.
Although the UK has publicly asserted its authority over Roughs Tower , it appears to be government policy to refrain from comment or action except when forced. British Government documents, now available to the public under the 30 year expiry of confidentiality, show that the UK drafted plans to retake the fortress, but such plans were not implemented by the then Prime Minister due to the potential for loss of life, and the creation of a legal and public relations disaster.
The Bates family
Irrespective of its legal status, Sealand is managed by the Bates family as though it were a recognised sovereign entity, and they, its hereditary, royal rulers.
Roy and Joan Bates have been referred to internally since the foundation of Sealand as "Their Royal Highnesses Prince Roy and Princess Joan of Sealand". Roy Bates is styled "Sovereign", and Joan Bates is sometimes described as being "in joint rule" with him. Their son is known as "His Royal Highness Prince Michael". Michael Bates has been referred to as the "Prince Regent" since 1999. In this role he apparently serves as Sealand's acting "Head of State" and also its "Head of Government". At a micronations conference hosted by the University of Sunderland on 25 November, 2004, Sealand was represented by Michael Bates' son James, who was referred to as "Prince Royal James".
Sealand's royals are all believed to retain UK citizenship, and the family has not been in permanent residence on the Roughs Tower facility since 1999. The facility is now occupied by one or more caretakers representing Michael Bates, who himself lives in Leigh on Sea, England. As Sealand is not a recognised country, the Bates family officially travel internationally as British subjects.
Sealand operations
Sealand possesses a simple constitution, instituted in 1995, which consists of a preamble and seven articles. The preamble asserts Sealand's independence, while the articles variously deal with the Sealand's status as a constitutional monarchy, the empowerment of government bureaux, the role of an appointed, advisory Senate, the functions of an appointed, advisory legal tribunal, a proscription against the bearing of arms except by members of a designated "Sealand Guard", the exclusive right of the sovereign to formulate foreign policy and alter the constitution, and the hereditary patrilinear succession of the monarchy.
Current Sealand government bureaus are: the Bureau of External Affairs, the Bureau of Internal Affairs, and the Bureau of Posts Telecomms and Technology. Most of the organs of Sealand's government are apparently either inactive or operate outside of Sealand's territory itself. A Sealand State Corporation was chartered by Roy Bates and charged with the "development of the state" shortly after Sealand's foundation, but its current status and range of activities, if any, are unknown.
In the year 2000 worldwide publicity was created about Sealand due to the establishment of a new entity called HavenCo, a data haven, which effectively took control of Rough Tower itself. According to the Sealand official website, no other visitors or activities would be permitted . The original claim to the right to occupy Roughs Tower was maintained by Michael Bates, whose father Roy has removed himself to a great extent from further daily involvement.
Sealand's legal system is claimed to follow British common law, and statutes take the form of Decrees enacted by the Sovereign.
In 2003, Sealand also appointed its first official athlete - Darren Blackburn of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Blackburn has represented the Principality at a number of sporting events, including marathons and off-trail races. More details can be found at his website.
HavenCo
HavenCo Limited is a data hosting services company founded in 2000 which operates from Sealand. It was registered by Michael Bates through Companies House, a part of the UK Department of Trade and Industry, on August 22, 2000. Its registration number was 04056934, and its registered office was recorded as 11 Kintyre House, Cold Harbour, London, E14 9NL England. The directors were listed as Michael Roy Bates, who was named Chief Operating Officer, and Ryan Donald Lackey, a US citizen, born on March 17, 1979. Other founders included Sean and Jo Hastings and Avi Freedman. The company later relocated its registration to Cyprus.
HavenCo initially received broad coverage in the international media, appearing on the cover of Wired magazine, in over 200 other press articles and in several television reports. In these reports, HavenCo claimed to have established a secure colocation facility on Sealand, and that it had commenced operations as a data haven. Detractors claim that these reports gave the impression that HavenCo was registered on Sealand itself, and that the company would issue domain names under the authority of that entity, when in fact it had no entitlement to do so.
The company announced that it had become operational in December 2000, and that its acceptable use policy prohibited child pornography, spamming, and malicious hacking, but that all other content was acceptable. It claimed that it had no restrictions on copyright or intellectual property for data hosted on its servers, arguing that as Sealand was not a member of the World Trade Organization or WIPO, international intellectual property law did not apply. Other services available from HavenCo at the time included IT consulting, systems administration, offshore software development, and electronic mail services.
Following US terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, Lackey announced that the operation would block initiatives "contrary to international custom and practice." HavenCo claimed that it had experienced few difficulties with any foreign government or organisation, although according to detractors, the British government "reacted quietly" by enforcing British laws concerning unlicensed data transmissions to and from Sealand, although it is unclear what is meant by this, and no evidence has been produced in support of these claims.
Ryan Lackey left HavenCo under acrimonious circumstances in 2001, citing disagreements with the Bates family over management of the company. HavenCo itself is still in operation, but handled through the Sealand Web reseller company. "Havenco has been going through some changes and now have a reseller company that is taking over end user sales and support issues. The service will still be supplied by Havenco, just managed and paid for through the reseller company Sealandweb."
HavenCo resembles Neal Stephenson's fictional datahaven in the novel Cryptonomicon, and various details match up as well — an investor named Avi, location on an island, affiliation with cypherpunks, use of cryptography, etc. However, HavenCo was already in operation before the book was in wide circulation, and the concept of a data haven is a far older idea. The use of small islands as tax havens and flags of convenience is perhaps a hundred years old, and data havens claim to be an extension of that same theme.
Postal service and stamps
Sealand first issued postage stamps in 1969, when a helicopter service was instituted to carry mail between Roughs Tower and Brussels, Belgium. A significant volume of mail carrying Sealand stamps and postmarks was accepted without surcharge and passed by Belgian postal authorities into the international postal system at this time, which seems to indicate that a formal arrangement of some sort existed between them and Sealand.
Although few stamp issues have been made since the 1960s, Sealand postage stamps and postal cancellations continue to be used on most if not all mail from the principality, although the actual volume of such mail is believed to be limited.
The official policy of the United Kingdom's Royal Mail is to stamp envelopes not bearing UK stamps with a 'revenue protection' cancellation, meaning that postal carriage charges may be claimed from the recipient – although recent examples exist of mail bearing Sealand stamps and cancellations, to the exclusion of all others, being transmitted through the international postal system.
Sealand is not a member of the Universal Postal Union, which regulates the sending of mail between countries, and its address is in what it claims is a foreign country. In a similar manner, mail for the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus must be addressed to 'Mersin 10, Turkey'. The address publicised by Sealand as its postal address is: 'Sealand 1001; Sealand Post Bag, IP11 9SZ, UK'. The Royal Mail postcode is the one for Felixstowe near Ipswich, and the Royal Mail website gives the following standardised address: 'Sealand Fort, PO Box 3, FELIXSTOWE, IP11 9SZ, UK'.
Sealand's stamps are generally classed as "locals" by most collectors; such stamps are valid for the carriage of mail between a location that lacks a regular postal service, and a location from which the onward transmission of such mail occurs.
Coins
Sealand has declared its currency to be the "Sealand Dollar", which it deems to be at parity with the U.S. dollar. Several dozen different coins have been minted since 1972 in various units of this currency. Given Sealand's limited population, physical inaccessibility and lack of a real economy it is unlikely that these coins were ever intended for use as circulating currency. Most were produced in precious metals, which have appeal to investors and coin collectors. In the early 1990s, the claimant government in Germany also produced a coin, featuring a likeness of Prime Minister Seiger.
Wind Farms
Sealand may soon have some new neighbours - several offshore wind farms are proposed to be built nearby. It is thought that any such developments would not require the British government to interact with Sealand in any fashion, however there may be scope for challenges over usage of sea rights over the different claims of UK and Sealand territorial waters.
References
- How to Start Your Own Country by Erwin S. Strauss, pub. Breakout Productions, Port Townsend, WA, 2nd ed. 1984, ISBN 1893626156
- "How a law-less 'data haven' is using law to protect itself" by Gary Slapper, The Times, August 8, 2000 p3
- "A Nation for Friend and Faux" by Marjorie Miller, Richard Boudreaux, Los Angeles Times June 7, 2000 pA-1
- "Welcome to Sealand. Now Bugger Off" by Simson Garfinkel, Wired Magazine, July 2000, Vol. 8.07.
- "Stop signs on the web; The battle between freedom and regulation on the Internet", The Economist, Jan 13, 2001 p1
- "Has 'haven' for questionable sites sunk?" - a News.com article from August 4, 2003.
See also
External links
- Official website
- HavenCo Ltd.
- Archival Sealand website
- Website of Rebel Sealand Government
- National Anthem
- Alleged transcript of the 1968 UK court case
- Coins of Sealand – Complete catalogue of coins minted by Sealand.
- Meta Haven: Sealand Identity Project
- The Sea Forts – The history of Britain's World War II sea fortresses and their later use by 1960s pirate radio broadcasters.
- HMS Roughs - A skeptical legal analysis of Sealand.
- HMS Roughs/Sealand Movie - IMDB page for a forthcoming film about Sealand.
- Sealand & Havenco Photo Gallery - More Photos inside and out.
- Sealand, A Brief History - Danny Wallace's account of how Sealand inspired him to declare his flat independent from the United Kingdom
- Sealand statehood and nationality case – Administrative Court of Cologne, Germany, May 3, 1978
- Framed Nation Films - "E Mare Libertas" Sealand Documentary Film
- Darren Blackburn Website - Official website of Darren Blackburn - Sealand's first and only official athlete
- "Sealand: Wish You Were Here?" photographs and article by Kim Gilmour, Internet Magazine, August 2002