Revision as of 05:28, 8 October 2008 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Regarding your additions to Ed Hochuli: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 06:02, 8 October 2008 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Regarding your additions to Ed Hochuli: Follow-up |
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
Line 69: |
Line 69: |
|
|
|
|
|
I have removed your additions to ] as the "blown calls" in question are not significant in the long term. Please discuss the issue on the ] and get a ] before adding it. Consensus is already achieved to ]. Thank you. -- ] (]) 05:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
I have removed your additions to ] as the "blown calls" in question are not significant in the long term. Please discuss the issue on the ] and get a ] before adding it. Consensus is already achieved to ]. Thank you. -- ] (]) 05:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Re : As I noted in my previous message, other editors have already ] the September 28th game and have come to the consensus the that event was not notable in the long term. As one of the other editors put it, "Every questionable call should not be added". If you feel that the incorrect consensus was reached, I suggest that you bring it up on the Talk page for other interested editors to discuss and see if you can come to a new consensus. -- ] (]) 05:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Please accept my apologies if I came across as too harsh to you. As you have figured out, Ed Hochuli's article has become an attractant for fans with grudges. There have been many attempts at adding additional criticism or insults to the article and I used an overly harsh edit summary. Call it my own "blown call" if you would like. -- ] (]) 06:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC) |