Misplaced Pages

User talk:Traviskp: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:28, 8 October 2008 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits Regarding your additions to Ed Hochuli: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:02, 8 October 2008 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits Regarding your additions to Ed Hochuli: Follow-up 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 69: Line 69:


I have removed your additions to ] as the "blown calls" in question are not significant in the long term. Please discuss the issue on the ] and get a ] before adding it. Consensus is already achieved to ]. Thank you. -- ] (]) 05:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC) I have removed your additions to ] as the "blown calls" in question are not significant in the long term. Please discuss the issue on the ] and get a ] before adding it. Consensus is already achieved to ]. Thank you. -- ] (]) 05:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

:Re : As I noted in my previous message, other editors have already ] the September 28th game and have come to the consensus the that event was not notable in the long term. As one of the other editors put it, "Every questionable call should not be added". If you feel that the incorrect consensus was reached, I suggest that you bring it up on the Talk page for other interested editors to discuss and see if you can come to a new consensus. -- ] (]) 05:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

::Please accept my apologies if I came across as too harsh to you. As you have figured out, Ed Hochuli's article has become an attractant for fans with grudges. There have been many attempts at adding additional criticism or insults to the article and I used an overly harsh edit summary. Call it my own "blown call" if you would like. -- ] (]) 06:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:02, 8 October 2008

Hello, Traviskp! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Regarding your additions to Ed Hochuli

I have removed your additions to Ed Hochuli as the "blown calls" in question are not significant in the long term. Please discuss the issue on the talk page and get a consensus before adding it. Consensus is already achieved to not include the September 28th game. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: As I noted in my previous message, other editors have already discussed the September 28th game and have come to the consensus the that event was not notable in the long term. As one of the other editors put it, "Every questionable call should not be added". If you feel that the incorrect consensus was reached, I suggest that you bring it up on the Talk page for other interested editors to discuss and see if you can come to a new consensus. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Please accept my apologies if I came across as too harsh to you. As you have figured out, Ed Hochuli's article has become an attractant for fans with grudges. There have been many attempts at adding additional criticism or insults to the article and I used an overly harsh edit summary. Call it my own "blown call" if you would like. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)