| Revision as of 05:01, 15 October 2008 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Blossom Goodchild=: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:19, 15 October 2008 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Blossom Goodchild: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| Re : It took me a moment to figure out what you were referring to as it was rather vague, but now I follow. I made a mess for moment, but I think I've got everything back to the way it should be. Since the admin that closed the AfD was to moving the article back into mainspace, the reposted content speedy deletion is borderline. I recommend filing another AfD if you think the article should be deleted in it's current form. -- ] (]) 05:01, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | Re : It took me a moment to figure out what you were referring to as it was rather vague, but now I follow. I made a mess for moment, but I think I've got everything back to the way it should be. Since the admin that closed the AfD was to moving the article back into mainspace, the reposted content speedy deletion is borderline. I recommend filing another AfD if you think the article should be deleted in it's current form. -- ] (]) 05:01, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Re : I blocked an IP regarding that article? I don't remember blocking anybody specifically for vandalizing that article. It appears that there are lots of IPs interested in her for whatever reason. I suspect that the vandalism is just a lull. -- ] (]) 05:19, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:19, 15 October 2008
Orgone
Hey Mr M. Orangemarlin and TMtolouse are back to adding the POV tag to Orgone again, for no reason I can discern (in case you hadn't noticed). I've filed another ANI about it Misplaced Pages:ANI#Orgone.2C_again.... just thought you'd want to know. --Ludwigs2 04:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
A. A. Allen
Check out my visit long ago. A.A. Allen talk page Kazuba (talk) 20:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Compromises
You do realize if you and I can compromise to several of these articles, most people won't complain. I appreciate what you just did! Thanks. OrangeMarlin 23:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Flaming campaign
Hi Martin, I spotted that you ammended the 'spiteful' heading on the WP:POV page. The user (et al.) is now throwing a tantrum and has engaging in a flaming campaign as part of their protest.This includes an allegation of me somehow being an anti-semite becasue I declared myself a policy nazi. Would you mind advising please, if you have time. Semitransgenic (talk) 11:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Binksternet reverted everything. But if you have a chance please can you take a look at this please and see what you think. My personal opinion is that the user is engaging, at the very least, in meat puppetry, more difficult to prove is the possibility that the same user is employing different accounts from differnent IP's, home, work, perhaps. An unresolved sock puppet case has been filed, if you would like to add a comment you can do it here. You are of course free to ignore all of this! Thanks. Semitransgenic (talk) 13:11, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Response from Valueyou In terms of flaming - I was unaware I was doing anything incorrect as I am a fairly recent editor here. The point is Semitransgenic continues to attempt to charge me with this false silliness. I am sure that Semitransgenic would like to see me kicked off of wiki as I dare oppose Semitransgenic's aggressive language and editing tactics. What a waste of time. Valueyou (talk) 13:39, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry Martin for drawing other comments here. See VY's talk for comments by others, the user has been instructed to go to WP:DR. Semitransgenic (talk) 13:59, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- PLease ignore above, issues have been addressed for now. Best. S. Semitransgenic (talk) 15:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- For now! : ) Cheers. S. Semitransgenic (talk) 21:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Just a friendly reminder
This RfAr was opened and involves you - you seem to have missed Shoemaker's message about this, so I'm reminding you. Thanks. Garden. 14:44, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Psychokinesis revert
Greetings. I reverted your edit to the disputed tag on Psychokinesis. I understand why you made the edit you did, based on the talkpage, but I dont' think that is the intended use of the field. Please see my suggestion in the article talkpage and see if we can have a less garrish alternative to point out the article-issues. thanks! -Verdatum (talk) 21:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Blossom Goodchild
Seriously? You should know better than this. X MarX the Spot (talk) 03:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
No, just lost track reloading the history page. ——Martin ☎ Ψ Φ—— 03:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- I see what you mean. :) I think I'm gonna unwatch the page and let it go down the shitter. The vandals can have it. There are more important articles to focus on. Be well buddy. X MarX the Spot (talk) 04:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- Actually there's no need. It's been G4 speedied. :) X MarX the Spot (talk) 04:51, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Re your message: It took me a moment to figure out what you were referring to as it was rather vague, but now I follow. I made a mess for moment, but I think I've got everything back to the way it should be. Since the admin that closed the AfD was agreeable to moving the article back into mainspace, the reposted content speedy deletion is borderline. I recommend filing another AfD if you think the article should be deleted in it's current form. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:01, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- Re your message: I blocked an IP regarding that article? I don't remember blocking anybody specifically for vandalizing that article. It appears that there are lots of IPs interested in her for whatever reason. I suspect that the vandalism is just a lull. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:19, 15 October 2008 (UTC)