Misplaced Pages

:Requests for adminship/Mairi: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:53, 3 October 2005 editJIP (talk | contribs)Administrators68,537 edits →[]: support and question to SPUI← Previous edit Revision as of 19:12, 3 October 2005 edit undoJossi (talk | contribs)72,880 edits →[]: supportNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:
#'''Support''', very active at ]. Surprised she's not in ], though, given her name! ;-) --]/] 05:57, 3 October 2005 (UTC) #'''Support''', very active at ]. Surprised she's not in ], though, given her name! ;-) --]/] 05:57, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
#'''Support''', can't think of anything sexual to write here. ] | ] 09:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC) #'''Support''', can't think of anything sexual to write here. ] | ] 09:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Mairi has promised that she will interact more, so I take that in good faith. ] 19:12, 3 October 2005 (UTC)


'''Oppose''' '''Oppose'''
Line 39: Line 40:
#'''Delete''' nn roadcruft --] (]) 21:58, 1 October 2005 (UTC) #'''Delete''' nn roadcruft --] (]) 21:58, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
#:Are you sure you're voting in the right place? ] | ] 09:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC) #:Are you sure you're voting in the right place? ] | ] 09:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
#'''Neutral'''. Same concern as with ] above. +3,000 edits and only 64 on Talk? I would want to see more exchanges with other editors. If he promises more involvement with other editors, I will support. ] 00:54, 2 October 2005 (UTC) #'<s>''Neutral'''. Same concern as with ] above. +3,000 edits and only 64 on Talk? I would want to see more exchanges with other editors. If he promises more involvement with other editors, I will support. ] 00:54, 2 October 2005 (UTC)</s>
::I'll promise to make an effort to interact more with other editors (on Talk as well as other namespaces). I also think my contributions on ], ] and ] show some interaction with others. And it's 'she', by the way ;) --] 01:48, 2 October 2005 (UTC) ::I'll promise to make an effort to interact more with other editors (on Talk as well as other namespaces). I also think my contributions on ], ] and ] show some interaction with others. And it's 'she', by the way ;) --] 01:48, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
:::Note that I deliberately avoided using he/she issue in my nomination :) ]...<font color=green><small>''] :::Note that I deliberately avoided using he/she issue in my nomination :) ]...<font color=green><small>'']

Revision as of 19:12, 3 October 2005

Mairi

Vote here (24/0/2) ending 05:10 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Mairi (talk · contribs) – Mairi is closing in rapidly on 3000 edits (see here) in just over a year as a Wikipedian. A very conscientious and busy worker at the Stub-sorting WikiProject, Mairi has also done a reasonable amount of vandal-reverting and other tasks that rollback would be very useful for. Edit history is in a useful cross-section of namespaces, and a glance at Mairi’s talk page gives a good indication of positive interactions with other wikipedians. Hand Mairi a mop, folks! Grutness...wha? 05:10, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Thank you for the nomination. I accept. -Mairi 06:00, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator, of course! - Grutness...wha? 05:11, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. Grutness is among those whom I trust, and I've seen this editor around. Redwolf24 (talk) 05:19, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. Support --Alynna 05:28, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. Support wikifies too. Ryan Norton 05:35, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  5. Support --Rschen7754 05:43, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  6. Support --Rogerd 07:10, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  7. Support CambridgeBayWeather 07:23, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  8. Support. sɪzlæk 09:47, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  9. Support, though you could use a bit more usertalk namespace edits. →Journalist >>talk<< 16:51, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  10. Firm stub-sorting mafia support. Alai 17:16, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  11. Support. Stub-sorters are valuable people and need all the tools they can get. The Singing Badger 17:59, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  12. Support, by all means Lectonar 18:51, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  13. Support Private Butcher 21:56, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  14. Support! Good editor. --WikiFanatic
  15. Support Trust Grutness on this, contribs look great. Rx StrangeLove 23:21, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  16. Support, I trust the nominator. Mairi does great work on stub-sorting. Robert 01:20, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
  17. Merovingian (t) (c) 05:25, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
  18. Support: very good works. --MissingLinks 07:52, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
  19. FireFox 12:08, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
  20. Support Stewart Adcock 14:56, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
  21. Support. Mairi was the one to first {{welcome}} me. She seems great. Quicksandish τκ 21:26, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
  22. Support Mr Muscle Mairi loves the jobs you hate, hand her the mop. Alf 22:00, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
  23. Support, very active at WP:WSS. Surprised she's not in Category:User gd, though, given her name! ;-) --Angr/tɔk tə mi 05:57, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
  24. Support, can't think of anything sexual to write here. — JIP | Talk 09:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
  25. Support. Mairi has promised that she will interact more, so I take that in good faith. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ 19:12, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

  1. Delete nn roadcruft --SPUI (talk) 21:58, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
    Are you sure you're voting in the right place? — JIP | Talk 09:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. 'Neutral'. Same concern as with User:Quale above. +3,000 edits and only 64 on Talk? I would want to see more exchanges with other editors. If he promises more involvement with other editors, I will support. ≈ jossi ≈ 00:54, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
I'll promise to make an effort to interact more with other editors (on Talk as well as other namespaces). I also think my contributions on WP:WSS/P, WP:WSS/D and WP:SFD show some interaction with others. And it's 'she', by the way ;) --Mairi 01:48, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
Note that I deliberately avoided using he/she issue in my nomination :) Grutness...wha?

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. One of the main things I'd like to do is help with the continual backlong at WP:SFD. I periodically go thru Short Pages, for which the ability to delete pages would be quite useful. Rollback would be convenient for the occasional vandal-reverting. The ability to resolve copy-paste moves would also be useful, as I come across those fairly often, particularly with newer articles.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. While I'm pleased with my varied contributions to WP:WSS, I don't think there's any one thing in particular there that I'm especially proud of. Except for perhaps my almost-daily checks of Recent Changes for new stub templates, to try to bring some order to the multiplication of stub categories. The article I'm most pleased with my contributions to is Minifigures, although it's still very much a work in progress. I think I've made significant contributions to Gallery of flags by design, along with numerous other editors. I'm also pleased with my translation of Jaime Nunó from the Spanish Misplaced Pages article.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I haven't been in any significant conflicts, or any that have caused me stress. A few editors have been unhappy when I've nominated newly-created stub templates for deletion, but I've dealt with that by calmly explaining my reasoning and what standard policy is, and pointing them towards the deletion discussion so they can voice their opinion (in the case of those who didn't know where SfD was). For future conflicts I'd try to behave similarly, listen to the views of other editors and try to achieve consensus before taking any drastic actions.