| Revision as of 02:30, 25 October 2008 editGimmetrow (talk | contribs)Administrators45,380 edits rv, don't post here← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:33, 25 October 2008 edit undoMalleus Fatuorum (talk | contribs)145,401 edits just another admin fucktard thenNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| In ], we have Mackenzie p.223 supporting the statement "space is neither printable nor control" in the lead and "space is considered an invisible graphic rather than a control" in the ] section. If you have a chance, would you quote the relevant passage somewhere? This has piqued my curiosity. Thanks! ]] 02:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC) | In ], we have Mackenzie p.223 supporting the statement "space is neither printable nor control" in the lead and "space is considered an invisible graphic rather than a control" in the ] section. If you have a chance, would you quote the relevant passage somewhere? This has piqued my curiosity. Thanks! ]] 02:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| : the latter is closest to what Mackenzie actually says. It's a section explaining why the space was put at the start of the graphic characters (32) rather than the end of the controls (31). In a serial printer, it's either/both, but in a parallel printer it's an invisible graphic. You want the whole section? ] 02:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC) | : the latter is closest to what Mackenzie actually says. It's a section explaining why the space was put at the start of the graphic characters (32) rather than the end of the controls (31). In a serial printer, it's either/both, but in a parallel printer it's an invisible graphic. You want the whole section? ] 02:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == I'd still like to know, don't keep blanking it == | |||
| What were you warning me about? --] (]) 02:25, 25 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:33, 25 October 2008
|
|
|
Knightley et al.
I had worked a small bit on the Knightley article a long time ago and when I looked at it the other day, this is what I saw. A lot had been added to it, some without sourcing, so I've worked on it and it now looks a bit better. There is more addition to source, but it isn't earth shattering and I think the article is shaping back up. I realized at the time what I was seeing created a huge GA liability.
I understand that people put a huge amount of work on the Holmes article. My point on the combined refs was that it did already contain a great many combined refs - 16 separate refs already combined and 9 uncombined. The ones I combined were the handful that hadn't been. Perhaps it would help to tell you I do have some vision disabilities, and I try to always come back and check what I've done the next day, in case I've made an error. If I do, it's not because I'm sloppy, it's because I didn't see it clearly at the time. A group of us (okay, 3 people) have been trying to get through all the filmbio articles chosen for the 7.0 articles and it's a lot to do with little help. Thanks for letting me know about your comment, I appreciate it. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Canadian heraldry
Hiya,
Yeah, I'd asked about strict primogeniture & automatic eligibility of arms for OC recipients. If you have sources supporting those, I'd be eternally grateful.
Glad to see you didn't stay away. 03:37, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Update on FAC/FAR/FL closings
See User talk:Marskell#Update on FAC/FAR/FL closings. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
ASCII space: printable?
In ASCII, we have Mackenzie p.223 supporting the statement "space is neither printable nor control" in the lead and "space is considered an invisible graphic rather than a control" in the ASCII printable characters section. If you have a chance, would you quote the relevant passage somewhere? This has piqued my curiosity. Thanks! Anomie⚔ 02:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- the latter is closest to what Mackenzie actually says. It's a section explaining why the space was put at the start of the graphic characters (32) rather than the end of the controls (31). In a serial printer, it's either/both, but in a parallel printer it's an invisible graphic. You want the whole section? Gimmetrow 02:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
I'd still like to know, don't keep blanking it
What were you warning me about? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 02:25, 25 October 2008 (UTC)