Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tundrabuggy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:54, 25 October 2008 editTundrabuggy (talk | contribs)2,973 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 04:00, 28 October 2008 edit undoAriobarza (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,834 edits Need helpNext edit →
Line 37: Line 37:
==Need help== ==Need help==
Hi after seeing WW1 erupt over the Battle of Opis, I DO NOT want to see that over a disputed translation, of a battle in February 539 BC. That user ChrisO denies dispite my commentary and evidence to the subject, he lacks common sense and ignores all the evidence, its like a child asks you to give candy to him, and when you give candy to the child, the child rejects it. This is how ChrisO is. As you already know for some reason they do not become neutral, and he has recruited Aknillies, I now I spelled it wrong but it is the user who is uncivil, and loves Kurht, the translater that through her writing downplays Cyrus' acheivments. So please go on the talk page of Opis first read all my signed messages then read ChrisO's compare the two writings and see if ChrisO is correct or I am correct. I am tired of ChrisO waisting my time over this issue, ever since the first Opis dispute I barely got time to edit articles, if you could do this task I greatly appreciate it.--] (]) 11:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk Hi after seeing WW1 erupt over the Battle of Opis, I DO NOT want to see that over a disputed translation, of a battle in February 539 BC. That user ChrisO denies dispite my commentary and evidence to the subject, he lacks common sense and ignores all the evidence, its like a child asks you to give candy to him, and when you give candy to the child, the child rejects it. This is how ChrisO is. As you already know for some reason they do not become neutral, and he has recruited Aknillies, I now I spelled it wrong but it is the user who is uncivil, and loves Kurht, the translater that through her writing downplays Cyrus' acheivments. So please go on the talk page of Opis first read all my signed messages then read ChrisO's compare the two writings and see if ChrisO is correct or I am correct. I am tired of ChrisO waisting my time over this issue, ever since the first Opis dispute I barely got time to edit articles, if you could do this task I greatly appreciate it.--] (]) 11:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk

Tundrab they want to erase the memory of the Battle of the Tigris from the histories, please help me out, Xerxes hordes are closing in on my position!--] (]) 04:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk

Revision as of 04:00, 28 October 2008

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2



This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

How-to make and delete a page

Cyrus cylinder

FYI, I'm going to be working on an alternate version of the Cyrus cylinder page which would limit all the "reviews" and subjective interpretations of the cylinder (negative or positive) to direct quotes fully attributed to their authors. I'll be making an attempt to replace the sections As a charter of human rights and As an instrument of royal propaganda with a Legacy section. It would be made up of two sub-sections called "proponents" and "critics", containing the various views on the cylinder as direct quotes, while leaving the rest of article to a factual description to give readers a neutral presentation of what the cylinder is, as opposed to what it represents or means -- free of spin or speculation. Feel free to contribute to the temporary page at User:Khoikhoi/Cyrus cylinder. Khoikhoi 00:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Civility warning

Your comments here about my supposed motives are completely unacceptable and a blatant violation of civility. Please confine your comments to discussing the article, not speculating on what you think people's motives are. -- ChrisO (talk) 09:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Content Dispute

You might be interested in here: --Nepaheshgar (talk) 00:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Nahum Goldmann

please look at the correct pages next time....Tundrabuggy you unfortunately incorrectly noted the page numbers as 22-23 whereas the number I gave (look in history of article) was 22 and 31-33,....The statement was neither inaccurate nor misleading....Ashley kennedy3 (talk) 07:35, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

The quote did not say 22-23,....it gave 22 and 31-33.. check the history of the quote to confirm....as you misread you failed to look in the right place....please next time double check....Ashley kennedy3 (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

My quote was pgs22-23 because those were the pages that would either confirm, or not confirm, your edit. Your pages 31-33 did not confirm your edit. Your edit was apparently your interpretation of those pages. The earlier pages demonstrate that the edit is wrong, as their was indeed a campaign by noted Zionists in relation to the quota system...further, as I have said in the talk page, your edit implies that there were no European Jews allowed into US and that is simply incorrect. Please let's keep this on the talk page and refrain from a revert war. Tundrabuggy (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Hezbollah

I've left a note on the talk page which mentions one of your edits. I don't see how the article is benefiting from a lot of what's going on there at the moment. --Nickhh (talk) 09:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Need help

Hi after seeing WW1 erupt over the Battle of Opis, I DO NOT want to see that over a disputed translation, of a battle in February 539 BC. That user ChrisO denies dispite my commentary and evidence to the subject, he lacks common sense and ignores all the evidence, its like a child asks you to give candy to him, and when you give candy to the child, the child rejects it. This is how ChrisO is. As you already know for some reason they do not become neutral, and he has recruited Aknillies, I now I spelled it wrong but it is the user who is uncivil, and loves Kurht, the translater that through her writing downplays Cyrus' acheivments. So please go on the talk page of Opis first read all my signed messages then read ChrisO's compare the two writings and see if ChrisO is correct or I am correct. I am tired of ChrisO waisting my time over this issue, ever since the first Opis dispute I barely got time to edit articles, if you could do this task I greatly appreciate it.--Ariobarza (talk) 11:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk

Tundrab they want to erase the memory of the Battle of the Tigris from the histories, please help me out, Xerxes hordes are closing in on my position!--Ariobarza (talk) 04:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk