| Revision as of 12:10, 6 October 2005 editRobert McClenon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers197,100 edits Archdiocese of Arlington ?← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:18, 6 October 2005 edit undoPjacobi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,850 edits Taxil hoaxNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| It isn't an archdiocese. It is a diocese. There is a bishop of Arlington, Virginia. Have the Masons been deleting a statement by the rector of St. Thomas More's about Catholic teaching on Freemasonry? ] 12:10, 6 October 2005 (UTC) | It isn't an archdiocese. It is a diocese. There is a bishop of Arlington, Virginia. Have the Masons been deleting a statement by the rector of St. Thomas More's about Catholic teaching on Freemasonry? ] 12:10, 6 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Please have a look at ]. --] 19:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:18, 6 October 2005
Welcome!
Hi Lightbringer (usurped - blocked)! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! CambridgeBayWeather 17:54, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
List of proposed Jack the Ripper suspects
Your last edit to the above article was a direct copy of Freemasonry Watch which means it was copyright material. CambridgeBayWeather 17:54, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
- No it wasn't at all, but I find it very interesting that you are so familiar with this webpage that you think you can "recognize" it. Of course you and other Masons don't seem to mind continually cut and pasting Masonic propaganda directly from Masonic websites. Why is that?Lightbringer 10:26, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Juwes
Your last edit to the above article was a direct copy of Freemasonry Watch which means it was copyright material. CambridgeBayWeather 17:54, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
- Actually it isn't copyrighted material, but I respect Misplaced Pages's guidelines and policys. My purpose of posting that, my last 'act' of the night was to show 'dreamguy' how it feels like to have ones entire work deleted and replaced by someone else's, as he did to me five times over a 24 hour period. Initially all I had posted was an offsite link to a webpage about the freemsonry-jack the ripper theory. Dreamguy deleted this. I then modified one of the sections about suspects adding info about the 'freemasonry theory'. Dreamweaver deleted this as well. I then made an entry in the additional theory section about the same topic. Dreamguy deleted this as well. I then posted isbn and publisher info about Stephen Knights book. Dreamguy deleted this as well. I then made an entry about the Marquess of Salisbury the PM of England in the suspect area. Dreamguy deleted this. I then posted an offsite link about the Movie Murder by Decreee. Dreamguy deleted this also. I then in a moment of intemperance, albiet understandable, deleted Dreamguys 'work' on the 'Juwes' a slander against Stephen Knight as well as his 'work' on the suspects page, which he obviously views as his personal webpage, and replaced it with the excerpts from the FW site, before beddy bye.
- All I wanted was to post a link to an offsite page about the Freemasonry Suspect theory, a theory that has been made into two famous and popular Hollywood Movies. It is obvious to me, at least, that Dreamguy is very afraid, for some odd reason, of people reading, even in passing, about the exixtance of the 'Freemasonry Theory'. Readers will have to draw their own conclusions for the reason for that.
- Actually, no, I am not afraid of people reading about it, as I helped create several articles here covering the topic, what I object to is linking to sites with fictional information (Murder by Decree, From Hell, etc.) or proven propoganda (freemasonrywatch.org) as if they were valuable and factual information. DreamGuy 22:56, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
Copyright posting
While I understand that you are anti-Freemasony you can't post copyright material. CambridgeBayWeather 17:54, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
And even if the sections were not copyrighted, they violated the Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view policy. Since you admit your goal here is to oppose Freemasonry your actions here are completely contrary to the point of this site. Any edits you make that try to advance your agenda will be removed, per the operating principles of this site. DreamGuy 22:56, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
- Don't think so .sswipe. It is you who have the hidden agenda and are violating Wikopedia'a guidelines regarding Neutral Point of View. My goal is to bring some light to the topic of Freemasonry, it is you who are the fundamentalist with your lunatic, deceitful stubs slaging 'anti-masons'. Any edits YOU make that try to advance YOUR AGENDA will be removed, per the operatating principles of this site. Noone likes Masonic Kreeps, that means you Dreamguy.
Please sign your posts on talk pages
I've been trying to follow what is going on on the Freemasonery talkpage, and I've noticed that you don't sign your postings, which makes it harder to follow who says what. So if you would be as kind and sign your posts with ~~~~ (which is automaticly changed into your username and a timestamp), I would be a much less confused man. Thank you, WegianWarrior 18:32, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
3RR
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 05:17, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- They've been discussed to death by me, it is them, the Masons who do not discuss their edits. If your bothered to check your facts you would see I have never edited the Misplaced Pages Freemasonry page more than once in 24 hours. Why do you not post on Dreamguys page and tell him to stop deleting my links to articles because he says they are 'anti-masonic', hmmm? You can not justify your post.
Arbitration Request re: Freemasonry Article Started
This is a notice to inform you that an arbitration request has been filed concerning you. The link is here for the main arbitration page, and here for the specific case. MSJapan 21:56, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Archdiocese of Arlington ?
It isn't an archdiocese. It is a diocese. There is a bishop of Arlington, Virginia. Have the Masons been deleting a statement by the rector of St. Thomas More's about Catholic teaching on Freemasonry? Robert McClenon 12:10, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Taxil hoax
Please have a look at Talk:Taxil hoax. --Pjacobi 19:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC)