| Revision as of 20:59, 5 November 2008 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits Re: SeXinema.com | Latest revision as of 19:57, 6 November 2008 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: SeXinema.com: Reply | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Re : I can restore the article to your user space while you work on it. However, you would need show that the site meets the ] for inclusion on Misplaced Pages. With the site being new and having very low traffic, it is unlikely that it would be notable enough for inclusion on Misplaced Pages unless it has received coverage by news media. -- ] (]) 20:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC) | Re : I can restore the article to your user space while you work on it. However, you would need show that the site meets the ] for inclusion on Misplaced Pages. With the site being new and having very low traffic, it is unlikely that it would be notable enough for inclusion on Misplaced Pages unless it has received coverage by news media. -- ] (]) 20:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Re : Sure, not a problem. I've restored the page to ]. -- ] (]) 19:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:57, 6 November 2008
Re: SeXinema.com
Re your message: I can restore the article to your user space while you work on it. However, you would need show that the site meets the notability guidelines for inclusion on Misplaced Pages. With the site being new and having very low traffic, it is unlikely that it would be notable enough for inclusion on Misplaced Pages unless it has received coverage by news media. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Re your message: Sure, not a problem. I've restored the page to User:Bwn2008/SeXinema.com. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)