Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:21, 7 November 2008

your edits

Your edits are usually POV, always poorly written and from strange sources if at all. Don't be surprised that so many other editors revert your edits. Blanking all your warnings doesn't lose that history, either. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 05:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Geisha

Other editors asked you to discuss about your recent edits on the talk page. Ask for consensus before you change the article again. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 06:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. but i can't understand why you delete sourced material. Please give me a reason that why you delete sourced material. if you disagree it, then you should add counterpart source.Masonfamily (talk) 06:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't work that way. If someone is an unknown author/dismissed as talking trash by the academic majority, no one is going to bother to take the time to debunk the theory/view. John Smith's (talk) 08:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

I've read your sources. Your edit was copy vio again from the first source text page 3 line 7 and 8. And it was a description on oiran/tayu, not on geisha. The third source you provided says geisha are not prostitute. So please do not add the material again. And why did you remove this before you answer my question? Now I explain my revert. Please explain your edit and answer my question. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 09:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Please read this and this. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 09:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Yakiniku

Hi again. Did you read the source carefully. It says '江戸時代になっても多くの人が肉を食べていた。' and 'しかし、現実には天明から嘉永にかけて、彦根城主から将軍へ、寒中見舞として牛肉の味噌漬が樽で献上されていたとの記録が残されている。' etc. BTW, I don't know who added but the source is not mine. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 06:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

According to your addition, it looks like Japanese didn't eat meat at all before Meiji era. But it was not. So I just think it would be appropriate to mention about it precisely. I've got to go now and if you have any question, I cannot answer immediately. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 06:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Please read these. , . , ja:牛肉 and ja:ももんじ屋. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 09:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

"Wikistalking"

I disagree with most of your edits so I revert them. I have an interest in Japanese and other East Asian pages. If, for example, you go and edit articles on Barrack Obama, burgers or Swedish history I will have no reason to take an interest in your work. John Smith's (talk) 19:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

3RR warnings

Your recent editing history at Yakiniku shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. John Smith's (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kumdo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. John Smith's (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Yamato period shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. John Smith's (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)