| Revision as of 23:51, 8 November 2008 editFlewis (talk | contribs)Rollbackers22,936 edits →User-reported: +← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:53, 8 November 2008 edit undoLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,604 edits →User-reported: responseNext edit → | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| :*'''Invalid''' - The "personal attacks" may not have occurred if the editor had not been warned of a "violation" (edit summaries are preferred, not required) that had happened, but this editor has used edit summaries. I shall be removing this report at my next pass through AIV. ] (]) 23:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | :*'''Invalid''' - The "personal attacks" may not have occurred if the editor had not been warned of a "violation" (edit summaries are preferred, not required) that had happened, but this editor has used edit summaries. I shall be removing this report at my next pass through AIV. ] (]) 23:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::Removing sourced good quality content isn't vandalism? This doesn't constitute incivility? --''']<sup>]</sup>''' 23:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | :::Removing sourced good quality content isn't vandalism? This doesn't constitute incivility? --''']<sup>]</sup>''' 23:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::::If you read the edit summaries to 1. and 2. you will see that they were done in good faith - even if wrong that is not vandalism. Calling it vandalism and saying there are no edit summaries when there clearly are will often result in "incivility". ''"The trouble started when the other person retaliated..."'' is no basis for an AIV report. This is <u>not</u> simple vandalism, but you may wish to take it to ANI for other views. ] (]) 23:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :* Vandalising/personal attacks to userpages beyond final warning ]] 23:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC) <small><sup>(Moved by bot)</sup></small> | :* Vandalising/personal attacks to userpages beyond final warning ]] 23:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC) <small><sup>(Moved by bot)</sup></small> | ||
| *{{IPvandal|63.28.138.98}} - On ]; vandalism after final warning. vandalized ] twice according to his warnings.. ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 23:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *{{IPvandal|70.238.58.248}} + {{user|Derolic}} - On ]; vandalism after final warning. 3RR violation, vandalism. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 23:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:53, 8 November 2008
| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles and content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 01:33 on 27 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Alerts
Bot-reported
User-reported
- 74.234.45.208 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - vandalism after final warning - Personal attacks Flewis 23:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Invalid - The "personal attacks" may not have occurred if the editor had not been warned of a "violation" (edit summaries are preferred, not required) that had happened, but this editor has used edit summaries. I shall be removing this report at my next pass through AIV. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Removing sourced good quality content isn't vandalism? This doesn't constitute incivility? --Flewis 23:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- If you read the edit summaries to 1. and 2. you will see that they were done in good faith - even if wrong that is not vandalism. Calling it vandalism and saying there are no edit summaries when there clearly are will often result in "incivility". "The trouble started when the other person retaliated..." is no basis for an AIV report. This is not simple vandalism, but you may wish to take it to ANI for other views. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Removing sourced good quality content isn't vandalism? This doesn't constitute incivility? --Flewis 23:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Vandalising/personal attacks to userpages beyond final warning HalfShadow 23:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)