| Revision as of 12:43, 11 November 2008 editBharatveer (talk | contribs)4,593 edits cleanginup- junk posts← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:02, 11 November 2008 edit undoToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,720 edits →Hold on a sec: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| It is not at all clear that the edits you are repeatedly reverting on ] are vandalism, rather they appear to be incongruent with your POV. I observe you in violation of ]. Please seek consensus before further reversion. ] <small>(])</small> 12:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | It is not at all clear that the edits you are repeatedly reverting on ] are vandalism, rather they appear to be incongruent with your POV. I observe you in violation of ]. Please seek consensus before further reversion. ] <small>(])</small> 12:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Hold on a sec == | |||
| You really seem to be on a roll here. What's up with ? It seems like the information you are removing is well sourced, well placed, and on topic. Frankly your action here looks like either vandalism or POV pushing. Stop. ] <small>(])</small> 13:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:02, 11 November 2008
Welcome!
Archive 1: February 2006 - May 2006 ; Archive2 : June 2006 - July 2006 ; Archive3 : Aug 1st,2006 - Aug 9th,2006 ; Archive4 : Aug 10th 2006 - Aug 31st 2006; Archive5 : Sept 1st 2006 - Sept 12th 2006; Archive6 : Sept 13th -Nov 6th; Archive7 : Nov 7th - Dec 4th; Archive8 : Dec 5th 2006 - 21st October 2007; Archive9 :Till Feb 29th 2008; Archive10 :Till April 15th 2008; Archive11 :Till June 20th 2008; Archive12 :Till August 5th 2008; Archive13:Till October 20th 2008;
- Hmmm...Isn't it a bit strange, that an IP from UK only edits the article on Binayak Sen and nothing else. I guess something fishy over here. Shovon (talk) 20:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Religious violence in Orissa. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. -- Tinu Cherian - 10:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- Tinu Cherian - 11:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
3RR on Religious violence in Orissa
Just letting you know that you have already crossed 3RR for Religious violence in Orissa. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Tinu Cherian - 11:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- User tinu, Please stop making senseless allegation. You know very well that I have not committed 3RR. See edit_diff@10:12 (This "revert" (related to sister's alleged rape) was for undoing removal of a "cited" source. See edit_diff@10:47.This revert was for undoing your senseless deletion of a cited source. As these two reverts were for two different sources, I dont understand how I committed 3RR. Please explain .-Bharatveer (talk) 11:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Binayak Sen
Hi, I have requested an Admin to have a look and provide a third party opinion on the article. Please wait till we get the feedback. Till such time kindly do not revert any edits and let the IPs have a run as per their wish. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 10:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
3RR on Binayak Sen
It is not at all clear that the edits you are repeatedly reverting on Binayak Sen are vandalism, rather they appear to be incongruent with your POV. I observe you in violation of WP:3RR. Please seek consensus before further reversion. Toddst1 (talk) 12:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Hold on a sec
You really seem to be on a roll here. What's up with this edit? It seems like the information you are removing is well sourced, well placed, and on topic. Frankly your action here looks like either vandalism or POV pushing. Stop. Toddst1 (talk) 13:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)