| Revision as of 14:55, 20 November 2008 editNJA (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators30,514 edits +thanks.← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:21, 21 November 2008 edit undoTennis expert (talk | contribs)24,261 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| Thanks for the good summary of the arguments. It helped me see where some people were coming from, though I still have my reservations. Cheers either way. ] (] • ]) 14:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | Thanks for the good summary of the arguments. It helped me see where some people were coming from, though I still have my reservations. Cheers either way. ] (] • ]) 14:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==Warning regarding unlinking of dates== | |||
| As this practice (and the actual manual of style guideline) are currently in dispute, you should probably back off of unlinking dates until the dispute is resolved. Prior ArbCom cases have looked unfavorably on editors who attempt to force through disputed changes on a large scale as you (and other editors) are doing. Specifically, ], which I quote: | |||
| {{"|Editors who are collectively or individually making large numbers of similar edits, and are apprised that those edits are controversial or disputed, are expected to attempt to resolve the dispute through discussion. It is inappropriate to use repetition or volume in order to present opponents with a fait accompli or to exhaust their ability to contest the change. This applies to many editors making a few edits each, as well as a few editors making many edits.}} | |||
| Continuing this behavior could be considered disruption. Please stop and instead participate in the ongoing discussions at ] and elsewhere. ] (]) 07:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:21, 21 November 2008
Welcome!
Hello Colonies Chris, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- GraemeL 22:41, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Wow
Nice work, Chris! the skomorokh 21:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Use of "iNtuition" in Myers-Briggs Type Indicator articles
Hi Colonies Chris, I noticed that you changed "iNtuition" to "Intuition" in the ESFJ article using AWB. Please note that "iNtuition" is the correct usage in Myers-Briggs terminology. The letter 'N' represents intuition, while the letter 'I' represents introversion. Thanks! ThreeOfCups (talk) 23:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
Belated thanks for fixing up the references in the Descriptive psychology article. A definite improvement. Anscombe (talk) 20:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Date formats
Thanks for the good summary of the arguments. It helped me see where some people were coming from, though I still have my reservations. Cheers either way. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Warning regarding unlinking of dates
As this practice (and the actual manual of style guideline) are currently in dispute, you should probably back off of unlinking dates until the dispute is resolved. Prior ArbCom cases have looked unfavorably on editors who attempt to force through disputed changes on a large scale as you (and other editors) are doing. Specifically, Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Episodes_and_characters_2/Proposed_decision#Fait_accompli, which I quote:
Editors who are collectively or individually making large numbers of similar edits, and are apprised that those edits are controversial or disputed, are expected to attempt to resolve the dispute through discussion. It is inappropriate to use repetition or volume in order to present opponents with a fait accompli or to exhaust their ability to contest the change. This applies to many editors making a few edits each, as well as a few editors making many edits.
Continuing this behavior could be considered disruption. Please stop and instead participate in the ongoing discussions at WT:MOSNUM and elsewhere. Tennis expert (talk) 07:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)