| Revision as of 21:19, 25 November 2008 editKralizec! (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators35,851 edits →Friendly note regarding talk page messages: consensus at WT:USER and WP:VPP has indicated otherwise← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:44, 26 November 2008 edit undoEqualRights (talk | contribs)3,324 edits ←Replaced content with 'Weary; taking a break as of 2008-11-25'Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Weary; taking a break as of 2008-11-25 | |||
| <!-- | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 50K | |||
| |counter = 1 | |||
| |algo = old(7d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:EqualRights/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| --> | |||
| ]''']] | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ''''']!''''' I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *Also feel free to ]. | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on ] using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our ''']''', and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ] or place {{t1|helpme}} on ] and someone will drop by to help. <span style="background: #EECCFF;">] <small>(] / ])</small></span> 03:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == RE: Homophobia == | |||
| Sure, I'll have a look. —<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="2px">''']'''</font><sup><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="1">]</font></sup> 15:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I've responded on the article's talk page, and readded the category. —<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="2px">''']'''</font><sup><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="1">]</font></sup> 15:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::My apologies, a little misunderstanding on my part there. Anyway, I've stated my opinion and given a formal warning to the user for personal attacking. —<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="2px">''']'''</font><sup><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="1">]</font></sup> 13:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello! == | |||
| Hello! :) I like your username. I totally support equal rights for everyone. This might interest you as well: {{FTF_Invitation}} --] (] ] ] ] ]) 18:18, 27 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Not a deliberate fortune-teller! == | |||
| Hey there, thanks for correcting me on the Sweden thing. I was mostly going by what I was hearing on the radio, and it was a little unclear to me whether or not the bill had already passed since they were talking about the outcome in such certain terms. It sounded to me like it had, but I also missed the beginning of the story. Either way, it's a nice bit of news. :) --] (]) 09:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| If you see an editor go past 2RR then you need to warn them on their talk page otherwise you will have to wait an extra revert before posting a 3RR report. If ] reverts once more then you need to show the following , , , . Add one more revert and you can file a report and it is a 24hour block for a first offense. Warnings in edit summaries don't count. I hope this information has been of use to you. ] (]) 12:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :The 3RR can be a handy thing to know, as most vandals have no idea about it, if you see a 3RR in progress warn as quickly as possible, also take a look at the format of 3RR reports on the admin page. ] (]) 13:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Greetings == | |||
| Hi I must have overlooked u before. I have just a issue with a part of one sentence on pegging its "suggested" that men "may" get more satisfaction. Its just an opinion and not a fact. I also read the entire article you referenced from askmen.com and do not see it "suggested" that men MAY enjoy anal stim more than women anywhere. Some women may enjoy anal stim more than men because it stimulates the vagina as they share the same membrane.Just because men have a prostate doesn't mean they enjoy prostate stimulation some find it painful some get nothing out of it.It is an individual thing. Sorry to have deleted the entire section on you....new girl in town :) . Lets resolve this in some way. ] (]) 12:20, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, the best place to discuss is (publicly) in the ] —] (]) 13:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Thank you for adding the source to this article which I had tagged. --] 14:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Friendly note regarding talk page messages == | |||
| Hello. As a recent editor to ], I wanted to leave a friendly reminder that as per ], editors may remove messages at will from their own talk pages. While we may ''prefer'' that comments be archived instead, policy does not prohibit users -including anonymous editors like this one- from deleting messages from their own talk pages. The only kinds of talk page messages that cannot be removed (as per ]) are declined unblock requests (but only while blocks are still in effect), confirmed sockpuppet notices, or IP header templates (for unregistered editors). These exceptions only exist in order to keep a user from potentially gaming the system. Thanks, ] (]) 18:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I have to disagree. Talk pages of IP accounts don't belong to anyone. Since we have no evidence that the same user is on an IP from one moment to the next, there is no way of knowing who is deleting the material. ]] ] 19:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I used to feel the exact same way (and used to revert warning-deleters like no one's business), however when the issue was extensively discussed back in April at both ] and ], consensus was quite clear that policy does not differentiate between registered and anonymous editors (see ] and ] for the full debate), and as such ] and ] were updated to explicitly reflect this. In penance for my earlier harassment of IPs who removed warnings from their own talk pages, I now leave friendly messages like the one above to try and help others avoid the same mistakes I did. --] (]) 21:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:44, 26 November 2008
Weary; taking a break as of 2008-11-25