Revision as of 03:12, 14 October 2005 editMattflaschen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,013 edits DYOH← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:16, 14 October 2005 edit undo24.156.90.90 (talk) Superm401Next edit → | ||
Line 1,499: | Line 1,499: | ||
:'''Do your own homework'''. ] | ] 03:12, 14 October 2005 (UTC) | :'''Do your own homework'''. ] | ] 03:12, 14 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
== Superm401 == | |||
Can anybody tell me why Superm401 drinks dog sperm? |
Revision as of 03:16, 14 October 2005
Reference Desk |
| |||||||||
How to ask a question
| |||||||||
|
| ||||||||
After reading the above, you may ask a new question by clicking here. Your question will be added at the bottom of the page. | |||||||||
How to answer a question
|
|
French composers of piano works since 1950
Although I have found, through on-line music stores, two composers who died only recently, both having written piano works, I would like a greater selection from which to choose works written as recently as possible, having a very French flavour. Unless I buy these books I have no way of knowing the difficulty or style of the works.
Alternatively, can you give me some on-line contacts to French music publishing houses or shops which deal with french piano music.
At a later date. I'd like to do the same with piano music from other countries.
- Poulenc died after 1950. You can also look at the French composers category for more. Dysprosia 00:04, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Some favorites of mine are Jean Françaix (1912-1997), Henri Dutilleux (b. 1916), and Alexandre Tansman (1897 - 1986) -- OK, so Tansman was born a Polish Jew, but he lived in France and may as well have been a Frenchman. As Dysprosia suggests, Category:French composers may be helpful, as will List of 20th century classical composers. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 22:58, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Where can I find schematic of Christian denominational taxonomy?
Where can I find schematic of Christian denominational taxonomy that includes North American denominations? The one in the Christian Denomination article is not detailed enough to satisfy my curiosity. Also, are there detailed ones out there for Islam and Judaism?--RPlunk 02:29, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- This ebook is a good taxonomy of all the Eastern churches, most of which you'll find represented in North American even though they originated elsewhere. I don't know any sources for a broader view. Isomorphic 06:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
John F. Kennedy at the 1956 Democratic National Convention
Hello. At the 1956 Democratic Convention, John F. Kennedy attempted to run for vice-president but lost out to Estes Kefauver. I heard his words on radio and I would like to find a transcript. Where can I find an online transcript of everything Kennedy said at the convention? Thank you. --Blue387 04:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Blue387,
The John F. Kennedy Presidential Library has a reference desk see . You could try contacting them at John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library - Columbia Point - Boston, Massachusetts 02125 Tel: 1-866-JFK-1960 Fax: 617-514-1652. Their e-mail is kennedy.library at nara.gov. Capitalistroadster 04:50, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Bully case
What should I do if no one in my own country which is Malaysia does want to help me?
I need help. I need a lawyer or advocate to settle down problems i face. My relatives and their friends control my life; every aspect of my life. Their main concern of me is my financial and marriage/friendships/relationships. I have now reached the age of having financial independant, which means working & earning for my own living. This group of people use their own means to cut off my income and make sure I am alone, living in family circle without any friends. They also make sure I cannot obtain any evidence to sue them. They force me to be broke and humiliate us by being seen nakedness in toilet or bathroom.
Besides that, i face discrimination by my community and they reject to talk to me or work with me. Some of them might be under threaten by the above mentioned group of relatives and their friends. Some of them might use all types of excuses to discriminate me.
I seek help from many people, including church leaders, local political leaders, lawyers and etc. They all told lies and they received money as the rewards to bully me.
I don't know how to live on. Can you teach me how to live on without money? What type of help can i get? From where?
- The reference desk is primarily a place where we try to answer factual questions, rather than guidance in how to live one's life. Also, the economic situation, culture and legal system of your country are considerably different to my own, and those of the majority of the regular contributors to the Misplaced Pages reference desk.
- That said, if you are indeed old enough to live and work independently, if you can establish yourself with a home and an income that doesn't depend on your family, you can then sort out your other affairs from a position of strength rather than weakness.
- But before taking any action, maybe you should talk to somebody who can provide you with some guidance to evaluate your options - somebody who has no connection with your family, and, if coercion by them is an issue, somebody who is not susceptible to such coercion. Somebody who doesn't live in the same location as you, perhaps? Somebody who is a member of a different ethnic community?
- I'm sorry if my response is a bit vague. I wish you well in confronting the difficult issues you are clearly facing. Maybe somebody else who knows a bit more about Malaysia may be able to provide some more specific responses in terms of what legal and counselling services may be available to assist somebody in your situation. --Robert Merkel 14:33, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
I think when someone describes how "church leaders, local political leaders, lawyers and etc ...all told lies and they received money as the rewards to bully me", he is describing a problem to which your suggestion is not the answer. I am being opaque here out of lack of details and desire not to aggravate the poor guy's problems, but think about the probabilities... alteripse 15:15, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestions (N0. 153: Bully case) and I have tried to talk to someone from outside my community or different regions. They all are bribed with money and they left me in misery. A lot of people use me to get money. They all turned into multi-millioners overnight. It sounds crazy, but it is real. I know you won't believe me and think that I had the idea of bribery because they can't provide a solution to my problems. It is actually happening, in my surroundings.It is definitely true. That is why I cannot get help anywhere. That is why my problems still unresolved.
May I know is Misplaced Pages a representative of Commonwealth countries? If not, how can I contact the actual Commonwealth Organization that can provide me legal advice? Is there any legal department in Commonwealth Organization? I know it is a very personal problem, but if a citizen cannot get help from her own country, can she get help from overseas, especially commonwealth countries?
- I happen to know a person who lives in Malaysia and reports a problem very similar to yours. His name is Julian Goh & among other places he hangs out at Yahoo Groups TYR, so you can probably locate him there if you interested in comparing notes. His problem is not with family members but former employers, and he also got into a relationship with a woman who is in the family of the nation's leadership, which got the nation's secret police on his case (initially just to investigate anyone dating family members of nation's leaders), which he told me as a warning that they probably reading any e-mail I should send him so I should be careful. I told him that people who get in the habit of not doing illegal immoral unethical stuff or supporting any such behavior should have nothing to fear from whoever reads their e-mail. I not want to suggest he doing any such, but we did have some differences of opinion of what is appropriate based on our different cultural backgrounds. Anyhow, because I have met other people in USA with same kind of problem as Julian and you describe, I do know it happens, but I also suspect that in some cases people can be overly paranoid, ascribing evil explanations to stuff that happened for innocent reasons, or not understanding the context. I think in Julian's case, since he has been to universities in Australia and Taiwan, having seen how other cultures function, he is having trouble understanding how some things are done differently in different nations.
AlMac| 20:00, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- I have a suggestion: leave. If all the people who are bothering you live nearby, then going to another city may free you from their influence. It may be necessary to move in secret (without telling them), so they can't find you in your new location, at least not until you have established an independent life. However, you may find that these people were also helping you more than you knew, in which case this would be a valuable lesson and you could then return. StuRat 19:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Derrida's Deconstructionist theory
I'm not sure what your question is, but I would suggest looking at the Jacques Derrida, Deconstruction, and post-structuralism articles for more information. If you have a more specific question please post it again here. Best, Kewp (t) 12:11, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Coping With
Several years ago, there was a TV series based on the Coping With books. Was it ever released on VHS/DVD (and did it feature Elderado Dingbatti)? smurrayinchester 12:14, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Reservation land policies
I have been using a video called "Homeland" in my classes, a work tracing the experiences of four Pine Ridge families during the course of a three year period. At the beginning of the work Thurman Horse, one of the individuals featured, informs us that, subsequent to the Collier Act, many of the individual holdings had been sold and the those people now had nothing, had moved from the reservation. Later, however, another featured individual--Marian, I believe--explains that Pine Ridge people have difficulty starting businesses because they have little start-up money and they are not allowed to mortgage their individual lands as collateral.
I am puzzled. If people have been allowed to sell their individualized acres, why are they then alternatively not allowed to use them as collateral for loans? Any help you can provide in offering explanations for the differences, I would truly appreciate.
Harvey Klevar Professor of Anthropology Luther College Decorah, Iowa
- I sorted out your multiple posting and formatting issues. --Gareth Hughes 12:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Dear professor, you are not doing your employer any favors as I can't really parse all of your grammar. I'm not sure exactly which Pine Ridge you are referring to, but lets assume it is Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. We don't appear to have an article on a Collier Act, and I'm not sure what that is, do you know the year? Some web searching led me to believe Indian Reorganization Act is what you might be referring to. Anyway, it is more likely that instead of not being allowed to mortgage the land, it's more likely it was simply impractical or no one was willing to offer the mortgages. Bare land is hard to mortgage at all, and it usually comes with bad terms like high interest rates, high costs to start the loan, etc. The same thing can happen to a lesser extent with any rural land even with a house or building on it. The type of house matters too. Add on to that that the land is in the reservation and may not carry the same types of legal ownership as other land, so legal differences/difficulties could mean that the standard things that banks and mortgage companies want such as title insurance, etc were not available. It could also have been simple discrimination by banks. So basically I'm offering some plausable speculation. To really find out you may have to do some old fashioned book leather research on the laws in question and business practices of the area and time. - Taxman 18:57, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Won't somebody please think of the children?
Why do some people feel that it is neccesary to 'protect' children (which, apparently, ranges anywhere from a 2 year old to a 17 year old) from perfectly natural things such as sexuality, masturbation and, nudity (you can throw sexual-education in there as well)? I'm particularly looking for reasons outside the religious realm, as those are fairly obvious. So, reworded, my question is: Are there any reasons, outside of the theological, that people use to justify 'protecting' children from the above stated things?
An example of this 'protecting' would be a parent who zealously shields their child from any form of nudity (even the exposure the breasts). To me, this seems ridiculous as a prepubescent child wouldn't care about seeing someone of the opposite sex naked unless their parents made a huge deal of it, and a pubescent child would probably seek out nudity anyway.
Also, is this type of behavior restricted to the United States, or can it be observed elsewhere (such as Europe and Asia)? My many and sincere thanks in advance, --anon
- I would substitute moral for theological, as a non-religious right-and-wrong standard can also be responsible for this. I think that's about the extent of justification, however; there's no physical ailment, for instance, directly resulting from seeing a breast. For your second question, yes, this is observable worldwide to varying degrees. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 14:43, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Are you trying to start a flamewar? :-)
- One perspective is that the desire to shield children from these topics is essentially along the same vein as abstinence-only sex education. Essentially, pre-marital sex (and for that matter any sexual activity, including masturbation) is bad, any exposure to anything sexually-related (like breasts) will implant naughty thoughts in their mind, and therefore children should not be exposed to anything vaguely related to sexuality.
- Now, that caricature is probably unfair, and there are more subtle versions of it. One might argue, for instance, that contemporary American popular culture's treatment of sex gives teenagers the wrong idea about it (for instance, would you want your teenage son getting his ideas on how to treat women from the more misogynistic end of hip-hop?) and therefore a parent might seek to present a different picture.
- As to attitudes about children and sexuality, it certainly varies from country to country, and even within countries. Scandinavia, for instance, is far more relaxed about the fact that teenagers are sexual beings than the United States. Conversely, some Muslim countries all but prohibit men and women from seeing anything of each other's bodies unless they're married.
- Hopefully somebody can point you to some better articles that discuss this specifically; the censorship article doesn't really cover the idea of shielding children more than adults. --Robert Merkel 15:00, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Heh, I can assure you my intent is purely academic in nature. Thank you for your detailed answer. --anon
What strikes me about your question is your mention that the religious and theological reasons are "obvious". They are not at all obvious to me. Might you be confusing religion and theology with social custom? I'm not starting a fight, just quite surprised at your assertion and suggesting you re-examine some of the premises you are considering obvious. alteripse 15:19, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- I do suppose I may have worded that incorrectly. In retrospect, the term "obvious" probably doesnt convey what I wanted to say properly. What I mean is that I am fully aware of arguments for the 'protection' of children that originated for religious reasons, such as certain Christian denomination's views on masturbation ("spilling seed"). I probably used "obvious" because reasons such as those are commonly cited, and, in terms of my question, I am more interested in non-theological justifications of the 'protection' of children. I apologize for any offense I may have inadvertantly caused. --anon
- I think this is a fascinating question. Most parents in America, including secular ones, seem to think that there is something horribly wrong with chidren or adolescents seeing nudity. The ongoing debate about indecency in the U.S. revolves only around the best way to prevent young people from seeing indecency without infringing upon the rights of adults. That it is an imperative of government to "protect" children from indecency is considered a given. Now I lived in Europe for a couple of years, and things could not have been more different. There is nudity everywhere -- on daytime TV, on the news, on commercials, on billboards, on newsmagazine covers. No one cares. That certainly doesn't mean that European media is of a higher quality than American media by any means. Maybe there's something to be said for modesty -- I don't know. But it's fascinating to me how cultures superficially so similar could be so drastically different in this area. This would be a great book for someone to research and write. The title could be Nipplephobia.
- I'd like to hear from some (non-libertarian) American parents as to whether they feel it's wrong for kids to see nudity, why it is so, and whether they were aware of the fact that many other countries do not share American society's views of "indecency." The nudity taboo is so ingrained into American society that my stepfather wouldn't believe me when I told him that they show nudity on Czech TV during the day. -- Mwalcoff 02:29, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
This last is a good question. You become very aware of your culture's customs in a very different light when you are raising children. There are certain times when I consciously made a decision about an issue like that: sometimes going with convention and occasionally not. One of the dimensions to this type of issue is that social conventions like nudity taboos have a variety of purposes, including acting as a social glue and distinguishing members of the community from outsiders. You don't do your children a favor by not making them aware of the edges of behavior that would trigger surprise and unwanted responses from people around: there is at least some potential social cost to flouting or being ignorant of community social standards. So in my opinion a smart parent picks and chooses which conventions are worth teaching a child to disregard and which are not. Every society has this type of convention, each of which looks kind of pointless to another society. For example, there is a difference between teaching a child that telling racist jokes is stupid and offensive, and teaching them that the nudity/modesty standards of their community are stupid and offensive. People who think there are only a few of this type of convention in each culture are being oblivious: we live in them like fish live in water and no society is free of them. Raising a child to be ignorant of the major taboos of his culture does him no favor, but there is nothing wrong with explaining to him what a taboo is and the difference between not doing something because it is morally wrong versus not doing something because it is illegal versus not doing something because it might create social trouble for you. Is that the kind of answer you wanted? alteripse 01:48, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Quote from previous response: "Now I lived in Europe for a couple of years, and things could not have been more different. There is nudity everywhere -- on daytime TV, on the news, on commercials, on billboards, on newsmagazine covers. No one cares." As a UK resident I would say us British seem still to be relatively uptight compared to our European neighbours. In fact some of our night-time TV shows are compilations of mainland European adverts which are notable to us for their unabashed nudity. There is also a definite moral panic about paedophilia here. Two cases I can recall illustrate this, the first being very relevant to the question; One of our newsreaders was investigated when a photo developing shop passed on her photos of her naked bathing child to the authorities; the second when a paediatrician was hounded from their home (slaps forehead). --bodnotbod 01:57, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
WTO
How is the World Trade Oranization ran?
- Exactly how the Fortune Global 500 want it to be run, seeing the governments of the world take most of their marching orders from them...
- Oh, you wanted an answer that wasn't sarcastic? Try our article on the World Trade Organization. --Robert Merkel 15:05, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
6 October
6 October is "Ivy Day", marking the anniversary of the death in 1891 of the Irish parliamentarian Charles Stewart Parnell.
Ivy Day is most notably commemorated in James Joyce's short story " Ivy Day in the Commitee Room", included in the collection 'Dubliners'.
Still today in Dublin - wel, up to last year at least, Joyceans willl be seen about the city sporting a dark green Ivy Leaf on a jacket lapel
- Maybe you'd enjoy creating the article about Ivy Day in the Committee Room which is listed under Dubliners but still needs someone knowledgeable to write about it. If you're new to wikipedia, you might want to check out Misplaced Pages:Your first article and Misplaced Pages:Tutorial first. Happy Ivy Day.--Kewp (t) 16:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Caesorion
Is there any connection between the name of Julius Caesor and Cleopatra's son's name and the type of birth of the same name? I have tried finding this information on my own thru other websites but I have found nothing - which I suppose suggests that there is no connection, but...
Thank you in advance,
Keith Reaume
- Your spelling is letting you down: see Caesarean section. --Gareth Hughes 16:19, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Of course there is a connection: both the son and the type of birth are named after Julius Caesar. alteripse 23:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, this is a popular misconception (no pun intended). It almost certainly couldn't have been Julius Caesar, because mothers who underwent surgery to remove their babies from their wombs almost always died, however Julius's mother lived for many years after his birth. The term refers to a distant ancestor of Julius Caesar. And Cleopatra's son was Caesarion, whereas the operation is a caesarian section. Cheers JackofOz 00:51, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Do you think the type of delivery was called that before Julius Caesar or would have been called that since then if not associated with Julius Caesar? alteripse 00:54, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Check out caesarean section for some further discussion. Cheers JackofOz 02:12, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
I am convinced you are correct and a little embarrassed that I hadnt been skeptical of the folk etymology. Caesarean delivery is more likely to have been derived from caedere (cut),- the past participle of which is something like caesus from which we get incision and scissors. Thanks. So. New answer to Keith: what Jacko said! alteripse 10:33, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
I read an article in the European Stars and Stripes one time about an American columnist who wanted to get his hair cut like George Clooney's in a "Caesar cut". So he went to the German barber and asked for a "Kaiserschnitt", which he found out meant Caesarean section. At least, that's what his column claimed. :) User:Zoe| 05:30, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Do Hindus have angels?
Do Hindus have angels? I am a Hindu and recently bought the book 'How to talk with your angels' by author Kim-O-Niell. I tried to talk to angels as said in that book. But, I was not able to talk to any angels. What should I do to talk to angels? How can I talk to angels? Please help.
I am resisting the temptation to tell you that all the rest of us have angels we talk to regularly. So I won't pull your leg and I will assume you aren't pulling ours. Here is a straight answer. There are a whole lot of bestselling popular religion books like this published in the US. The buyers are mostly culturally-but-not-really Christians with average or below average intelligence who feel better reading these books, whose major message is "don't feel bad about yourself, Someone Very Important thinks you are just fine the way you are". If you match up most of them with real Christian doctrine (Eastern, Roman, Lutheran, Reformed, etc) you find the overlap small and very important things are missing. Sort of like the religious equivalent of french fries. So don't worry about it if the books (or the angels) are not talking to you. alteripse 22:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm struggling not to be flip here. But do you not have a religious leader who guides you in your worship who you can approach with such a question? --bodnotbod 02:00, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Steve Vai
Hi, I was just wondering if anyone knows so much about Steve Vai that they could add some more to the articles of his albums?
- I might look at leaving a copy of this comment on the talk page for Steve Vai. Alternatively, if you have knowledge about any of the albums or have access to reliable information about the albums, you may wish to add to the articles yourself. Our Misplaced Pages:Introduction tells you more about how you can get started. Capitalistroadster 23:51, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Watch the movie Crossroads (1986). You'll see Stevie play some mean guitar!
crowdy bay australia
why is Crowdy Bay so called?
- According to http://www.mynrma.com.au/mid_north_coast_cro.asp: "It reputedly gets its name from Captain Cook who dubbed a prominent headland 'Crowded Head' when he saw a crowd of aboriginals standing on it as he passed by in the Endeavour." Canley 00:47, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- The Macquarie Atlas has no record of a Crowdy Bay but does mention a Crowded Head as above. Capitalistroadster 06:48, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Letter from Birmingham Jail/Martin Luther King Jr.
Why does king advoate non-violent means of protest?
Three possible reasons, don't you think?
- It seemed to him the ethically right approach to the problem of improving the civil status of Negroes. Those who emphasize his upbringing as a Christian, his training as a preacher, and his admiration of Mahatma Gandhi tend to favor this explanation.
- It seemed to him the most politically effective method to improve the civil status of Negroes. Liberal intellectuals and historians tend to emphasize this reason.
- Subversive communist agitators convinced him to do it for the benefit of the Soviet Union. This was the reason favored by J. Edgar Hoover.
You decide. alteripse 00:52, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
The real answer is "Why not?". Does non-violence need any justification? JackofOz 00:54, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Also remember it was the early 60s, and the riots at Watts & Detriot, Washington etc. hadn't happened yet. King was showing white Americans through the Freedom Rides, Selma etc., particularly in the north, just how prejudiced, violent and awful Jim Crow could be. Also you don't get invited to the White House if you're a violent social disturber, and King was trying to achieve change through rational & calm methods. Towards the middle 60s there was division in the african-american community about whether to use violent or non-violent means to achieve their aims, but after the assassination of Dr. King the violent impulses got free reign because there was no one left to argue for the other side. Additionally King was trying to achieve improvements for many people, not just african-americans. He was planning a Poor Peoples' March on Washington when he was distracted down to Memphis and killed. JK
What happened in 1945?
- The United States spent most of the year without a Vice President. Please do your own homework. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 19:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Also see 1945. Dismas| 00:22, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- It might also be worth mentioning that both Germany and Japan surrendered, ending World War 2, after Hitler committed suicide and 2 atomic bombs were dropped on Japan. Also, survivors of Germany's death camps were freed and Soviet control of Eastern Europe started, eventually degenerating into the Cold War. And US President FDR died in office, being replaced by his VP Harry Truman. See 1945 for details. StuRat 19:51, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
What is the etymology of "hoodwinked" (to deceive)?
- A dictionary is a great reference for this. Try hoodwink at Wiktionary. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 19:38, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've yet to find a dictionary, however, that explains the etymology of hoodwinked. I think I'm pretty clear on the definition already. — Silvaran 23:09, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- To wink is to close ones eyes; a hood covers the head. The verb originally meant "to blindfold", which makes sense from the two parts - a hood that winks (blinds) you. (Blindfold itself was originally something like blind-fall - "to make blind"). It then became used metaphorically - compare to phrases like "pulling the wool over their eyes". Shimgray | talk | 23:28, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Yep, it's that simple -- OED2 just lists "hood (n.) + wink (v.)" for etymology. — File:Ontario trillium sig.pngmendel ☎ 16:04, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- To wink is to close ones eyes; a hood covers the head. The verb originally meant "to blindfold", which makes sense from the two parts - a hood that winks (blinds) you. (Blindfold itself was originally something like blind-fall - "to make blind"). It then became used metaphorically - compare to phrases like "pulling the wool over their eyes". Shimgray | talk | 23:28, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've yet to find a dictionary, however, that explains the etymology of hoodwinked. I think I'm pretty clear on the definition already. — Silvaran 23:09, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
business non-profit status
What are the benifits to having a non-profit business? And what are the regulations enforced upon businesses to maintain non-profit status?
--Janelle
- Generally, non-profits are taxed separately from regular businesses. However, the benefits and regulations vary by country and region, so it's probably best to check with your local Chamber of Commerce or a corporate lawyer for this. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 20:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
You also might find some interesting answers in the following articles, mainly on how it is handled in the USA (sorry I not have links to how it is in other nations), and those articles that these ones link to:
- Not-for-profit corporation
- Non-profit organization
- 501(c)
- Also other articles in the categories these are in.
AlMac| 20:13, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Quotation
"Age and treachery will usually overcome youth and enthusiasm." Who originally said it? When? Where, or in what work? Is it an accurate quote?
Try a few Google searches, mix up the quotation marks (like search "age and treachery" "youth and enthusiasm") and see what you get. I don't have time to do more right now, but...
has a link to this:
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2618616-3,00.html
Which says:
"He has a point, and for some reason the famous Mack Rhinelander .sig file pops into my head: ""Old age and guile will always triumph over youth and enthusiasm." Maybe it's a good thing for Helix Code that Updater isn't really what the business plan is all about. "
Hope this helps!
199.111.88.216 12:42, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Death by crushing
A coworker and I were talking about the Salem witch trials and it reminded me of something that I had heard years ago. The story I heard was of some ruler having a large number of prisoners that he wanted to have executed. So he brought them all into an area and had them lay down. A dance floor was then constructed over them so that the weight of the floor and its occupants was supported by the people being crushed. The dancers were not told of what was below them and the people below the floor were crushed to death. Does this sound familiar to anyone? I don't recall where I heard of this and a few google searches haven't reaped any results. Dismas| 00:20, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- I'd think the screams would've tipped them off, or maybe the way the floor kept moving off level! More importantly, that'd have to be a pretty heavy dance floor, keeping in mind that the weight of the dancers would be distributed across all of the prisoners. After all, crushing by elephant used a whole elephant just to crush one person. — File:Ontario trillium sig.pngmendel ☎ 16:01, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- You make good points. I'm still curious where this came from though. Dismas| 23:24, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, it reminds me both of Edgar Allen Poe's "Hop-Frog Or the Eight Chained Ourang-Outangs", where an oppressed hunchback conspires to kill a king and his advisors at a party (but no crushing), and of the death of Francesco II of Gattilusia, who “on a journey through Lesbos, while passing the night in one of the lofty towers then common in the Archipelago, ... was stung by a scorpion. Alarmed at his cries, his attendants and nobles climbed up into his room in such numbers that the floor collapsed and he was killed on the spot ... .” (as recounted by William Addams Reitwiesner in The Lesbian Ancestors of Prince Rainier of Monaco, Dr. Otto von Habsburg, Brooke Shields, and the Marquis de Sade. But those are probably unrelated<g>. - Nunh-huh 04:27, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- You make good points. I'm still curious where this came from though. Dismas| 23:24, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Wow. I had an elaborately flippant reply prepared... and then I checked. That monograph exists? Dude. I feel so much more cheerful about the world now. Shimgray | talk | 14:31, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Memes
Is it true that a meme rarely regenerates? If asked, will a meme serve as an answer? Is it true that one can splice syntactical meaning with logical non-meaning? Can someone please explain/make better?
american red cross
Dear Sir/Madam,
I admit, maybe there is a flaw in my research method. Thus far I have been unable to find the answers to the following questions: What is the organizational structure of the American Red Cross? What is the chain of command? How does changes in the organization come about? (ie, who makes the changes? is there a board that vote on a bill? etc.)
Thank you.
julie
- Take a look at . The fourth paragraph (starting "Following World War II") gives their organisational structure in brief. There's an email address at the bottom of that page which might provide a good resource for followup questions.-gadfium 04:46, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
name of movie
I'm looking for a movie that I say when I was really young about a jurnalist who decided to write about being a playboy bunny. I can't remember much about it ather then this. If you culd help me I would really like to know what it is called. Thanks Kitten 9:51pm Oregon
- Probably A Bunny's Tale, a 1985 TV-movie based on Gloria Steinem's experience and starting Kirstie Alley. --Metropolitan90 04:55, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Thank you sooooo much I've being looking forever adn no one seems to know what I'm talking about:) Thanks agian:)
serenity prayer origins
There have been multiple claims that "Reinhold Niebuhr" popularized but not originated a much older version. Two of the more common original authors were Christoph Oetinger and Franz of Assisi.
If there had been earlier versions of this prayer, should we not be able to find in old texts in libraries in the world that have cited the prayer?
Has anyone claimed with "black on white" certainty, in whatever langauge, a printed source from a book earlier than 1900?
If none exist, then the WikiPedia entry should note this point as further support of the Reinhold Niebuhr claim to fame. Dlwl 04:47, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Russian society
Why is the country of Russia more European than the rest of Asia? I can understand the western part being more like Europe but even the eastern section of Russian is far different the Mongolia, China, Japan or any other nearby coutries.
- Our Russia article should provide some assistance. Our Demographics of Russia article should be of some assistance as should our History of Russia article. Capitalistroadster 06:56, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- The western part of Russia is not just like Europe, it is in Europe. Valiantis 12:17, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- It is tempting to say the Europeans colonized what is now Russia (and some of that did happen, mainly from the Vikings), but in prehistoric times just the reverse happened, the people in Europe came from what is now Russia. That is why they are called Caucasians, after the Caucasus Mountains on the Southern border of Russia, where this broad ethnic group/gene pool/race apparently originated. StuRat 20:38, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Can one name their child a curse word?
Hi, just a quick question, in the United States, I was wondering if it was legal to name a child a profanity. I would never do such a thing, but I was curious as to if there were any laws in the US that would stop this from occurring. My closest guess it that it be seen as a form of child abuse, perhaps, and the parents might be forced to either change the kids' name or give them up, but I don't know enough about US law to be sure. Okay, thanks for your time!
199.111.88.216 12:36, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- I would agree that someone would lock you up for child abuse or some such thing. I know it's not in the U.S. but in Sweden there was the case of "Albin". His parents named him Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116 and insisted that it be pronounced "Albin". Dismas| 14:07, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
No laws at all in the US. There are plenty of weird names out there. Some make you think "poor kid." I think the only requirement for a legal name change if you are an adult is that it not be done "with intent to defraud." alteripse 14:37, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Happens all the time. Friends in Detroit tell me they've personally seen medical records with a girl name pronounced "Ash-oh-lay" spelled Asshole and another name pronounced Shi-thay-uh-d spelled Shithead. Unbelievable, but the parents thought it was just fine. I'm sure you could verify this with birth records which are probably public record. - Taxman 16:14, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, those are classic urban legend -- down to the "friends" who personally have seen them. Snopes has a good discussion of these and other unlikely names (I've always been fond of the lovely name Chlamydia). As far as I know, there aren't any state laws restricting what parents can name their kids, and it's far from anything US Federal law would attempt to control (or at least one would hope.) --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 22:10, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Such a law does exist in Quebec. Some people tried to name their kid "Spatule," as in the kitchen utensil, but they were prevented from doing so . -- Mwalcoff 23:57, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- There is a well known story about a little boy who asked his teacher why Mary and Joseph had named their baby after a swear word. Shantavira 13:03, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
sovereign states
I wonder how come the field of international relations is reserved for 'sovereign states', while excluding minorities or autonomies.. Could any one refer me to treaties/agreements/conventions defining a 'state'? I've found the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, but it is (officially) limited to the Americas. Is there any convention in International Law which specifies 'sovereignity' and 'state'?
- My understanding of this issue is that the definition of state as outlined in the Montevideo Convention is used as the de facto definition in international relations. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 21:29, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
My mother, a social worker once told me about a crack addict mother who was high as a kite at the time of her twins birth. She legally named on Chicken of the Sea and the other Master of the Universe. So who knows? Curse words might be no better.
Novelist or Author?
Most writers are described (as in on their disambiguation page) as "Author", example: Melville (Herman). Some are described as "Novelist", example: Conrad (Joseph). What is proper? Which is most accurate and/or honorable? Should Misplaced Pages consistently denote things like this?
Thanks! --131.183.98.134 13:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- According to Author, "The author of a book, story, article or the like, is the person who has written it (or is writing it). This can be short or long, fiction or nonfiction, poetry or prose, technical or literature; in particular it is a profession (doing this for pay)." So an author is a writer, but a novelist is someone who writes novels. Since Herman Melville wrote not only novels, but also short stories and poetry, the writer(s) of the article may have chosen to use author rather than novelist. However, in his article he is referred to as a novelist. Joseph Conrad also wrote novels and short stories, so perhaps he would be more accurately described as an author, rather than only a novelist. Perhaps Misplaced Pages should be more consistent about this. Be bold and change it yourself!
Frederick Douglass
Try Frederick Douglass --Borbrav 00:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Royal grants of title
Dear Sirs: Please tell me where I can find the actual wording of an English royal grant of title from the 17th Century under Charles I. If such a document is not available, any English royal document will be helpful. Thanks you. Louise M. Gouge
- What do you mean by "grant of title" - a grant of a title of nobility, or of title to land? The Avalon Project has a selection of letters patent for land grants. Are you trying to replicate one, or to confirm if a copy of one is accurate? Shimgray | talk | 17:19, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
media history and politics
how did the media change between 1750 and now?
- I'm not sure I understand your question. Are you asking how "the media" changed in the sense of "the people who produce news information" or do you mean the question to be about the changes in how news information is conveyed since that time? In either case the changes between the 18th century and now are pretty large, it'd be hard to sum them up. In a nutshell, a lot of this has to do with changes in publishing -- cheap newspapers, increased literacy, changing role of news organizations, changing role of nation/states and the rights of communication, creation of magazines and other essay-length periodicals, etc., which are already a number of BIG changes which happen in the early 19th century without even getting into the innovations of the 20th century like radio, television, and the internet. --Fastfission 16:57, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- You can argue that telegraph was the biggie. All the rest is just refinements... --Robert Merkel 07:52, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
calusa indians
What did the calusa indians eat?what did they drink?
- Our Calusa article is silent on the issue other than referring to mounds of shells which suggests seafood was an important part of their diet. This article on various tribes of Native Americans in Florida states "The Caloosahatchee River ("River of the Calusa") was the main highway of the Calusa into the interior. Its banks teamed with small game and its waters were abundant with fish and shellfish. Calusa canoes could circumvent Lake Okeechobee and travel up the Kissimmee River into other tribal areas." It also seems that they were known as skilled hunters. Capitalistroadster 05:51, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
A title of Apollo
I have recently finished reading the excellent book War Music by Christopher Logue. It is a rewrite basically of the Illiad, and it is one of the most spectacular books I have ever read. I warmly recommend it to anybody, even if you're only slightly interested in Homer or poetry in general. Anyway, in the book he repeatadly calls Apollo The Lord of Light and Mice. The mice part is obviously a reference to the plauge amongst the greek troops. Now, I considered myself fairly knowledgable about classic greek works, in my youth I read both works by Homer aswell as several other great works, but I have never heard Apollo be called by that title. Logue says that his sources are exclusivly the several different translations of the Illiad (he can't even read greek), so is this something that like Alexander Pope used somewhere in his translation or something? Or is this a common title for the Sun-God? Any greek scholars here that can cast light on the subject? gkhan 16:11, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- 'Lord of Light' obviously comes from his role as the sun god; 'Lord of Mice' is indeed found in Homer, as Σμινθέως (glossed as 'Mouse-god'). (The same epithet is also found in Pausanius and Strabo.) I can't find any combination of the two names in any classical works; it may be from one English translation or another, but I suspect that it is of the author's invention. —Charles P. (Mirv) 01:53, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
I agree the combined epithet was invented by Logue, but there is a nice summary of the epithet smintheos ("god of the mice") from line 39 of book 1 of the Iliad in Walter Leaf's commentary: Smintheu, lit. ‘Mouse-god’; Apollo was worshipped under this title in the Troad, as at Smyrna as ‘Locust-god,’ Parnopios. Strabo (p. 606) knows of several places named Sminthia, as far as Rhodes. The Sminthian temple near Cape Lekton existed to historical times; and even on late coins of Alexandria Troas Apollo appears with a mouse at his feet. Mr. Lang argues that this indicates the amalgamation of the Greek Apollo with a local mouse-god, originally a tribal totem. The common explanation is that the word is a familiar abbreviation of Sminthophthoros, destroying the field-mice or voles which ravaged the vineyards: hoi gar Krêtes tous muas sminthous kalousin Schol. A (see Frazer's note on Paus.x. 12. 5). Only a few years ago Thessaly was seriously injured by an invasion of these little pests. Others see in the mouse the symbol of plague, which would be especially suitable here. In Herodotos the destruction of the army of Sennacherib is attributed not to a plague but to a host of field-mice which gnawed the Assyrian bow-strings in the night. A somewhat similar story connected with the colonization of the Troad is told by Strabo (p. 604). In 1 Sam. vi. 4 golden mice are offered as a propitiation when visited by a plague (W. Robertson Smith Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia p. 302, where further evidence is given for a Semitic mouse-god). erepsa seems to indicate the most primitive form of temple -- a mere roof to protect the image of a god standing in a grove; for it was to groves, not to buildings, that sanctity originally belonged. Temples are rarely mentioned in H.; we hear only of those of Apollo and Athene in Troy, and of Athene at Athens. See note on 5.446. charienta seems to be proleptic, for thy pleasure. For the construction of the prayer cf. E 115.
I snipped the above from the Perseus project. For other associations and allusions, the smintheos epithet is also discussed more extensively by Robert Graves in The Greek Myths than in any of the other compendia of Greek mythology I am aware of. alteripse 02:44, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
political science
please in not more than 2 pages, what is the definition and nature of political science?
- Ohh, you mean something like this? Please read the top of the page, then you can look at Political science and start from there. gkhan 18:48, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
banker's visors
Why were those old-fashioned visors worn by bankers green?
what is the role of the Popoe in the Ctholic church
The earthly head. See Pope. —Charles P. (Mirv) 19:35, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
The Ctholic church? Do you mean the Church of Cthulhu? -- Arwel 00:08, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Article and section or Amendment of the Constitution
If a personis indicted for a crime, what are all the rights which he has per the United States Constitution(Not the Miranda warning). What articles or Amendments are these listed under?
- The simple solution here is to think - well, Miranda v. Arizona held that people's rights weren't being protected on arrest, so what rights did they hold people had? Our article on that case says:
- The Court held that suspects, prior to being interrogated by police, must be informed of their rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
- (Note that the "Miranda right" is just to be warned of your rights - it didn't actually create those rights.) Our articles on the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution may be useful, also note the Fourteenth (which holds that all persons, citizen or noncitizen, are covered by these rights). Shimgray | talk | 19:57, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
I'm neither American nor am I a lawyer, so take this with a grain of salt :P Off the top of my head:
- Fourth amendment guards against unlawful searches (not really a problem if you are already under arrest, but oh well)
- Fifth amendment guards against having to witness against yourself and establishes grand jurys
- Sixth amendment ensures a jury-trial in a criminal case
- Seventh amendment ensures a jury-trail in a civil case
- Eigth amendment guards against torture and excessive bail
- Fourteenth ensures due process and equal protection
I'm sure there are more. Please see our articles on these amendments for the details. Also, I guess technically you could say that the first amendment ensures free speach for prisoners :D gkhan 20:05, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
family name
According to family legend we have a baroness in our family line, however any historical searches are leading me nowhere. Can you please provide me with information about a Baroness Von Orther it could possibly be spelled Von Orthor. According to the story she would have been from Bavaria. The family name that I am part of is Bankert, if that helps, and all our ancestors were to have come to the U.S. from Bavaria. Thanks so much!
Who are the best selling authors in human history?
Is there a list available of the authors who have published the most books, in order of the number of books they have published? This seems like a very simple/common thing to wonder about, but I haven't been able to find any information on, for example, author, writer, bestseller, or lists of authors. I am particularly interested in whether the forty million novels published by Terry Pratchett place him in, for example, the top ten or twenty novelists in history, by publication numbers. Thanks. -- Creidieki 23:02, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- God
- Mao Zedong
-- Миборовский 02:36, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- I hope you don't mean the bible. A bunch of people wrote the bible, the idea of a god was just the inspiration ☢ Kieff | Talk 07:48, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- The Communist Manifesto must be somewhere near the Little Red Book in terms of all-time sales records. That has to put Karl Marx up there at number three. It puts The Beatles claim to be bigger than Jesus into perspective. --Diderot 11:44, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- I would doubt that. Mao's work was required reading for all citizens of the world's most populous country; this was never the case with the Communist Manifesto. (Indeed, you might argue that the behaviour of those who later called themselves Communists suggests they hadn't paid much attention to Marx's message at all...) Valiantis 00:43, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- The Communist Manifesto must be somewhere near the Little Red Book in terms of all-time sales records. That has to put Karl Marx up there at number three. It puts The Beatles claim to be bigger than Jesus into perspective. --Diderot 11:44, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Technically, God didn't write the bible. He may have told people what to put in it, but it was the people on earth who actually put pen to paper. See Old Testament and New Testament. - 131.211.210.16 07:50, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
-
- However, if you are a believer, God did write the Koran (at least by dictation). That's probably sold a few copies. Valiantis 01:15, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- According to her Misplaced Pages article Danielle Steel has sold 530 million novels. I make no claims as to the veracity of this figure, but it beats Terry Pratchett hands down if the 40 million figure quoted is correct. Valiantis 01:15, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- The appallingly uninventive Catherine Cookson has sold over 100 million according to our article, further knocking Pratchett down. I would strongly assume Stephen King has sold more than Pratchett, As would Tolkien. But I've tried dozens of tweaked searches to find a chart with no success. --bodnotbod 02:28, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Greek word for excessive pride or ambition
hubris alteripse 01:19, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Bob Dylan - Nashville Skyline
I know Dylan did all of his recordings "live" - never dubbed anything or laid down separate tracks. On Nashville Skyline at the beginning of the song "To Be Alone with You" he asks if the tape is rolling and then a few seconds later starts singing. Does anyone know if this was "planned" (which doesn't seem like something Dylan would do) or if this is just Dylan genuinely asking if the tape was rolling since this was a "live" take of him playing and singing like usual? Thanks. --Nadsat 00:56, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Nadsat,
According to our article on Nashville Skyline, the recording of "To Be Alone With You" was very relaxed so I suspect it was unplanned and Dylan just liked the version of the song recorded in the take. The Allmusic.com article on the song states that the song was recorded in an "off-the-cuff atmosphere" see so it seems it was unplanned. Capitalistroadster 06:06, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Note also things like Bob Dylan's 115th Dream (where he collapses laughing) on Bringing It All Back Home, or various tracks on the Bootleg Series - there's a few starting with conversations, lead-ins, that sort of thing. Shimgray | talk | 11:49, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for your responses. I have noticed many of the bootlegs have that sort of relaxed manner to them, but this was the first time I noticed it so blatantly on a released track. Although, perhaps the recording of Rainy Day Women #12 and #35 rivals this one. Thank you for confirming that Dylan never "pre-planned" his recordings - which makes them all the more admirable. --Nadsat 15:16, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Boxer Rebellion
After I studied the Boxer Rebellion, I am wondering that what are the impacts of this event to China and "the outside world"? Would you please give me the answer as soon as possible and my e-mail address is (deleted to protect user's privacy). Thanks
- edited for formatting and to remove user's e-mail address --Metropolitan90 02:05, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- See Boxer Rebellion for information. --Metropolitan90 02:05, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Mr Ardennes
On the National Archives WWII photo gallery, number 111, there is the photo of the German soldier sometimes known as "Mr Ardennes". What is his name? What unit did he belong to? When was he born? Was he killed? Thanks.
-- Миборовский 02:08, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- The NARA's image description reads "A Nazi soldier, heavily armed, carries ammunition boxes forward with companion in territory taken by their counter-offensive in this scene from captured German film." Belgium, December 1944. but you probably already knew that. Date and place might give you a lead to figure out his unit... Lupo 08:25, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- The photographer (or cameraman, if it's a still from some movie) appears to have been on Fritz Winter , not to be confused with the painter Fritz Winter. However, on the various websites I found this image on there is some confusion on whether this is the photographer's name, the name of the soldier, or just a generic moniker. Lupo 08:51, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Got some more on him: "This man was in Kampfgruppe Hansen of the 2nd Company, I./SS-Pz.Gren.Rgt 1. His name is Walter Armbrusch, and he possesed the rank of SS-Schütze as an MG-42 gunner. Here he is seen after a successful attack on an Allied reconnaisance convy, with gear obtained from it. The picture is taken during the early days the Battle of the Bulge.". See , where there are a few more pictures of him. Maybe you can find more info in the book by Paul Pallud, The Battle of the Bulge, 1986; ISBN 0-90091-340-1, where he even features on the title. Lupo 09:10, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- And then again, maybe he's not Walter Armbrush: ... Also, see and . Contact the museum at Poteau... Lupo 09:32, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
HELP ME PLEASE
can someone please tell me what is the physical, metaphysical and spiritual nature of god as well as some of his personality traits, scars, tattoos, defining characteristics and his hair colour? PLEASE ANSWER RIGHT AWAY I NEED THIS FOR MY HOMEWORK FOR TOMORROW
- I'm pretty sure he's got Hell's Angels tattooed across his chest.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lomn (talk • contribs) 02:13, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Try our article on God. You could just have typed that into the search box.-gadfium 03:28, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- He looks exactly like Morgan Freeman.
- Seriously, we don't do you your homework for you, and there's no way we can provide a short answer to a question that has prompted millions of pages of discussion amongst theologians and philosophers for thousands of years. Try Gadfium's suggestion.--Robert Merkel 06:05, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- He's actually Alanis Morissette. Adam Bishop 06:06, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- I hate to get all theological on you here, but he actually played Moses. --fvw* 06:13, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- He had a go at playing the big guy as well in the abysmal Almost an Angel in 1990. Check the IMDB.--Robert Merkel 06:22, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- So he did, live and learn. --fvw* 06:24, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- He had a go at playing the big guy as well in the abysmal Almost an Angel in 1990. Check the IMDB.--Robert Merkel 06:22, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- God wears tights but I can't verify the claim about the tattoo. JamesMLane 06:42, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Industrial revolution between 1760 and 1830
Hi, i have a question in mind. Does Industrial Revolution leads to Asia being colonized by the West? Thanks shuhui
- Shuhui,
Our Industrial Revolution article states that took place in the late 18th and early 19th century. The chronology of Imperialism in Asia states that the Portuguese conquered Sri Lanka in 1505 and the process was well underway by the time that the Industrial Revolution started. Capitalistroadster 07:58, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- It didn't lead to it, but it did speed up the process by reducing the travel time between Europe & Asia & by increasing the industrial production capacity of Europe, & hence its demand for raw materials & its ability to provide colony countries with manufactured goods to bind them to the west (& in the case of guns & bullets to speed the process of conquest). AllanHainey 12:18, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Rescind or revoke the Nobel Peace Prize
Has the Nobel Peace Prize ever been revoked, rescinded, stripped from, taken back, or otherwise discredited with respect to a particular recipient? Have there been political controversies after the fact of awarding the Prize? Has it ever been refused, on the part of the recipient?
- To quote Richard Feynman:
- Then I began to think, "How can I turn this all off? I don't want any of this!" So the first thing was to take the telephone off the hook, because calls were coming one right after the other. I tried to go back to sleep, but found it was impossible.
- I went down to the study to think: What am I going to do? Maybe I won't accept the Prize. What would happen then? Maybe that's impossible.
- I put the receiver back on the hook and the phone rang right away. It was a guy from Time magazine. I said to him, "Listen, I've got a problem, so I want this off the record. I don't know how to get out of this thing. Is there some way not to accept the Prize?"
- He said, "I'm afraid, sir, that there isn't any way you can do it without making more of a fuss than if you leave it alone."
- Now, he was talking about Physics not Peace, but the principle applies - it's really very difficult to refuse a Nobel prize without causing a massive amount of fuss. I don't believe anyone has done it. It's been treated as a joke with regards to some recipients - Henry Kissinger was a popular topic of satire, for example - but the prize itself hasn't been discredited nor have they had it revoked; note, though, that in many years it simply hasn't been awarded. In something as "political" as Peace, though, I suspect they quietly sound out the recipient to see if they're likely to do something messy like refuse it. Shimgray | talk | 11:38, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, Le Duc Tho refused when he and Kissinger were awarded it. Likewise, Jean-Paul Sartre refused his, though it got kind of messy. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:47, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Gerhard Domagk and Richard Kuhn were forced to refuse Nobel Prizes by the Nazi Germany, but they accepted it after the war. Tintin 03:11, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- Boris Pasternak was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1958, but he declined to accept it, probably under pressure from the Soviet authorities. Tintin 10:25, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
A Nobel Prize can be refused but not taken back. After the outbreak of widespread Palestinian violence in 2001, people (depending on which side they were on) called for the rescinding of Yasser Arafat and Shimon Peres' peace prizes. But the Nobel people said that once you win a prize, it's yours to keep, just like on Wheel of Fortune. -- 70.27.57.22 00:28, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- They took it back from Milli Vanilli. Oh, no wait - I'm thinking of something else. --bodnotbod 02:42, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
SURVEY OF SELECTED SOCIETIES AND CULTURES IN AFRICA SOUTH OF THE SAHARA.
Africans clim to be the pace-setters in development but are still one of the deprived continents in the world.discuss
- That's not a question. And which Africans, exactly, "clim" to be the pace-setters in development? – Quadell 11:53, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Presidential approval ratings
Greetings. According to a Time poll, President Bush's approval rating is now down to 37%, his lowest ever. When was the last time any president had such a low approval rating? I assume Nixon's was lower toward the end, but has there been a case since then? – Quadell 11:51, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- There are "end of term" approval ratings which are recorded as lower, but these are generally statistically freaky - people who lose tend to have people saying they really preferred the other guy &c. So Nixon was 24% when he left, and Carter 34% according to - but you'd get more realistic numbers if you polled people the day before the election, not after. has some polling data for the same week in their second terms, which is more the sort of data we're looking for. Gallup says Truman had the lowest approval ever, 23% in January 1952 - but in January '52, as mentioned above, we'd be looking at an end-of-office poll so it may be exaggerated. . Carter apparently hit a disapproval of 59%, which probably means under 37% approval (these figures never add up due to "undecided") during summer '79, so he's probably the last case - not really the example W. would like to compare himself to, I fear. (Before you cry "but Ford!", people kinda liked Ford, all told. Heck, I like Ford. He didn't screw up much.) Shimgray | talk | 12:32, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
ABC News says George H.W. Bush hit 33 percent during his presidency. That was right before the 1992 election. -- 70.27.57.22 00:22, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
also, do we have a list of US presidents who got the electoral vote without a popular majority, somewhere? I am curious as to how many times this has happened. 17:09, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- never mind, I found it, it happened four times, John Quincy Adams 1824, Samuel J. Tilden 1876, Benjamin Harrison 1888 and George W. Bush 2000.
survey of selected societies and cultures in sub saharan africa.
African claims to be the pace-setters in development but it is still one of the deprived continents in the world.80.255.50.66 13:34, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- What's your question? Dismas| 13:49, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Anything that ends "Discuss" is obviously a homework question! Notinasnaid 14:21, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Vocal range: Contralto and Sopprano
Hello, I've been looking all over the web for an answer to this question, so I hope you can help me. Recently, I started taking private vocal lessons, and discovered that my usable vocal range spans a little over 3 octaves. From D above tennor C to F above sopprano C. This covers both the Contralto and Sopprano ranges, and I wanted to know if there is a term for that, which I could put down on an application to music school. I've asked my teacher, but she isn't classically trained and doesn't know.
Thank you for your help.
Georgia
- Mezzo-soprano, perhaps? I'm not familiar with the terminology of the field, though, and that seems to be a seperate classification which is not quite one nor the other. Looking at Fach might help, or Vocal ranges.
- Alternately, if you just want your range determined, you could contact a vocal teacher who is classically trained (your teacher may know one) and ask if they'd be willing to let you know the proper terminology for the applications, for a small fee. They'll likely know this stuff better than someone who can't hear you! Shimgray | talk | 15:26, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Most women's voices are naturally centred on the range of mezzo-soprano, and most women feel more comfortable singing closer to that range. It is important to note the difference between possible vocal range and the useful one: being able to eac a certain note does not mean that you will necessarily be able to sing it well. A trained voice is able to expand its range, though it often develops quite distinct registers. These are a bit like gears on a bike or car: the voice changes in timbre as it shifts register. It would be useful to sing through your range (ascending and descending) with your teacher and notice where the distinct divisions of register fall. This might give you some idea of your technical proficiency in a certain vocal range. Besides that, simply choose what is most comfortable and which range appeals to you most, noting that there is often more competition between sopranos than there is between other singers. --Gareth Hughes 15:35, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- I have no idea, but congrats on having such an amazing range. ♥purplefeltangel ♥ 21:27, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've been doing a lot of editing on vocal range articles in Misplaced Pages, so I'm delighted to see a question about it. I do love being useful. I agree with Shimgray. The only way to determine your voice type in classical terms is to work with a classical teacher for a few months and have him/her figure it out. Voice classification involves not just range but timbre, tessitura, registration, and so on. Until you've had some time to work out these things with a professional, it's not really sensible to apply a label. And, of course, it depends on what sort of music you tend to sing. Keep at the lessons, and worry about the labels later. 02:52, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- My son has almost the same range as an "unchanged" voice at 12-years old. The opera company lists him as a "Treble", a woman in the same range a "Mezzo-Soprano".
Autonomy and Foreign Affairs
This is a restatement of a question above the received no replies. We're studying the relationships between sovereign states and autonomous regions or autonomous identity groups. It seems commonly accepted that 'international affairs' is a competency (a responsibility or delegated power) that is 'reserved' for the central government or the sovereign state, meaning then that autonomous regions generally are excluded from international affairs. Of course, there are exceptions. What we would like someone to help with is to point us at a reference that explains or defines or identifies the source of this generally accepted international legal norm. We would like to be able to point to the foundational documents, treaties, or international agreements which indicate how this practice came into effect. Thanks if you can help!
- The first particular case I can think of is the US, where the "sovereign states" merged into a single entity and signed away their competency to international relations.
- I remember reading some interesting debate on "montevideo minus one" entities a while back - places that fulfil three of the four Montevideo criteria - which is here. (Yes, Montevideo technically only refers to the Americas, but it is considered generally relevant in international affairs anyway - it's not binding, but it's something usually accepted as Making Good Sense). As one of the four criteria is "ability to enter into relations wirh other states", you might find it interesting. Shimgray | talk | 15:37, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Does having a military establishment create competency in that it's not so important to talk to someone who cannot invade your territory? --Gareth Hughes 15:58, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- During the Middle Ages, and earlier periods, it was common for local leaders to actively involve themselves in international relations. The Treaty of Westphalia is often considered the point where Europe switched to modern nation state based diplomacy. This came about, in part, because the central governments gained a monopoly on violence during this era. - SimonP 19:24, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Actually, sometimes, subnational governments do get involved in international affairs. The Canadian province of Quebec, which likes to act as if it's an independent country, has its own ministry of international relations and has quasi-embassies all over the world. In the U.S., states are prevented from signing binding international agreements under Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution. Nonetheless, states regularly engage in nonbinding agreements and cooperation with foreign entities. See this article on the role of North American states and provinces in foreign affairs. -- Mwalcoff 01:09, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- Many US states, and even major cities, have trade missions to other nations, states and cities ... check out sister cities for example.
- Can a political entity join the United Nations or take grievances there?
- Some American Indians complained to the UN that the USA had violated some treaties with them. Very true, but the UN did not recognize the tribes as having standing at the UN. AlMac| 02:57, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- There are various non-national entities with accepted observer status at the UN - see United Nations General Assembly observers - but they can't actually join, as this is reserved for sovereign states (and in effect not all of them - Taiwan, whilst generally considered sovereign by the world, won't be able to join as China would be sure to veto it) Shimgray | talk | 19:39, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- I don't know the source for the 'accepted legal norm' that only sovereign states are the only ones able to deal with other sovereign states in international affairs. I don't think that there is a specific legal document which sets it out (apart from impositions imposed by central government on the limits of the authority of their provinces or devolved components. I would suspect one or more of the following as the reason though:
1) No sovereign state is going to deal with a non sovereign state (Eg France makes a treaty with Wales) as it would lead to conflict, & possibly war, with the country (sovereign state) which claims that territory (Eg United Kingdom). Although in the past such things have occurred with countries making deals with governments in exile where the 'sovereign state' is one they are already at war with(eg UK sheltered, recognised & made agreements with French, Polish in exile in WW2 when their countries were no longer sovereign as they'd been occupied by Nazi germany.
2) No sovereign state would want to make deals with a constituent part of another country for fear that country will recognise & make treaties with parts of its own territory (EG the USA wouldn't have made a treaty with Scotland incase the UK made a treaty with Virginia, the CSA, etc).
3) Unless you are intentionally aiming to destabilise another country there would be no point in dealing with non-sovereign states as the sovereign state which claims authority over them wouldn't recognise any agreement (Eg if you made a treaty with Catalonia Spain wouldn't recognise it and would probably get very upset at both of you. Also if Catelonia made such an treaty in its own name it could be considered as an act of secession & could be quickly surpressed).
4) Unless it is making a bid for autonomy/independence no non-sovereign state is going to make a deal on international relations with a sovereign state. If its bid succeeds then it is a sovereign state itself & its agreement before that is forgotten (EG American colonies alliance with France before they won independence), or if they fail the agreement is forgotten & no longer valid (Can't think of any examples of this, though that may prove the point). AllanHainey 15:44, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
A basic principle of most international organizations (UN, African Union, OAS, etc.) is non-intereference by the organization or its members in the internal affairs of another member. making treaties or delas with a sub-national entity would violate that principle. I would expect that national governments developed that principle to protect their own positions against foreign interference. There are some small deviations from the principle: the Government of Quebec (as "Canada-Quebec"), and the French Community of Belgium are members La Francophonie as "participating governments", but these are rare exceptions. Ground Zero | t 21:40, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- One historical case I've just remembered is the British East India Company which was a non-sovereign commercial entity which made binding treaties (though they usually broke them) with a large number of Indian principalities & sovereign states. On a number of occasions even buying & selling some of those states to/from other Indian rulers. AllanHainey 07:11, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Are patents copyrighted?
Are patent copyrighted? Are the text and images in a patent application copyrighted? Thanks. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 15:31, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Unless explicitly stated otherwise I would assume so. They are original work, they are creative, so yes. Shimgray | talk | 15:37, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- They're patented rather than copyrighted. But the effect is the same. You can't use such material. - Mgm| 16:27, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- To clarify: Of course the concepts being patented are copyrighted, but I'm fairly certain the actual documents involved in applying for a patent are public domain, if that's what you were asking. (But IANA patent L.) So you should be able to copy patent documents to your heart's content; just not the concepts. Garrett Albright 17:38, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Why would the patent documents be public domain? Yes, they're public information in the sense that they're not secret, but I'm not at all sure they're not copyrighted... Shimgray | talk | 17:56, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- The official patents are published by the US Government, and therefore can't be copyrighted, correct? Brian Schlosser42 20:13, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Why would the patent documents be public domain? Yes, they're public information in the sense that they're not secret, but I'm not at all sure they're not copyrighted... Shimgray | talk | 17:56, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- That's right. When you apply for a patent, the materials are made freely available and public domain (in regards to copyright.) – Quadell 20:30, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Doesn't automatically follow, though - the USG can't claim copyright on its original work, but it is legally able to hold copyrights originally claimed by others; the GPO is able to publish copyrighted works, for example.
- That said, I checked with the USPTO - Patents are published into the public domain as part of the terms of granting the patent to the inventor. As such, they are not subject to copyright restrictions. . Note it may still contain trademark images, so be careful when assuming freely-republishable. Shimgray | talk | 22:26, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- It also depends on which country. That might apply in the US but not in other countries with different Copyright laws. For example, much material from the US Government is in the public domain but that does not necessarily apply elsewhere. I would check with the relevant patent authority unless you are interested in the US. Capitalistroadster 08:54, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Psychology
What is the philosophical difference or approach difference between social psychology and clinical psychology? (Is there a web site or a reference that you can recommend with a chart or a simplified explanation showing situations and both the clinical and social psychologists response to that situation or question?)Thank you------Cathy
The professional duties of a clinical psychologist are to her patients. Her most common work is dealing with the mental health problems of individual people. Her success is usually largely dependent on her patients' satisfactions or outcomes.
The duties of a social psychologist are nearly always to her employer, whether it be a university, a commercial business, a government agency, or a large organization that deals with the public. Her most common work is to understand, or devise ways to change, the behavior of groups or categories of people. Her success is largely judged by whether her employer or academic peers find her reports or suggestions worthwhile or useful. She is unlikely to deal individually with people in a therapy capacity.
And here is a value-added freebie: A clinical social worker is a different animal from both of those. Her training is different, but her work more closely resembles that of a a clinical psychologist than a social psycholgist. alteripse 20:17, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Window types
Is there a such thing as "French" window? What are they? Is there a name for floor-to-ceiling windows? --213.186.190.39 16:54, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, a French window (or French door) is a large window that reaches down to the floor and may also be used as a door. Why "French" I'm not sure. I don't know any special name for a floor-to-ceiling window. Maybe "picture window", but that's not necessarily floor-to-ceiling. --Bob Mellish 17:00, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- An image search might help you, though not all the hits are valid. --bodnotbod 02:56, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Music
Looking for some information on Music? --Borbrav 03:22, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- Does not compute... Need more parameters. =p __earth 14:20, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Philosophers who said that a God who intervenes in the world miraculously is not benevolent
I'm currently researching the idea that if God performs miracles in the world he is not considered benevolent. An idea shared by Wiles and Hume that I know of. Especially with infant deity argument.
This obviously links with the problem of evil and epistemic distance.
Arguments for and against from philosophers and perhaps personal opinions would be useful.
- Define benevolent, and define miracles?--inks 01:17, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- The Judaeo-Christian concept of God. A miracle as an act of God such as creation or direct interevention such as healing a foot.
- The major argument for would be that if God does do miracles, then God can do miracles, and if he is benevolent, there is no reason why He can't do a whole lot more miracles. God would then either be arbitary (since it cannot be reasonably argued that people who recieve miracles are more deserving than those who don't), or actually cruel. God would, of course, also be rendered imperfect, because events in the world would be shown to be not part of His plan to such an extent that He needs to dabble and fix things.--Fangz 01:01, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- I would also suggest you look at our Miracle article which discusses the concept from various points of view. Capitalistroadster 08:59, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- and theodicy.
Why not take as a supposition God giving man free will is evidence of benevolence. If God intervenes, that free will is taken away and God is not being benevolent.
- Surely that depends on the manner of the intervention? If his intervention is in healing and offering greater wealth then he is increasing freedom and still benevolent. --bodnotbod 03:01, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Pronunciation of the artist Edgar Degas's name
A friend once told me that the correct pronunciation of Degas's name was Degas, with the final "s" being sounded, rather than "Degah". Never have I heard it pronounced thus. What do you think?--Nora Brown 23:24, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Click the audio link: Webster lots of issues | leave me a message 01:00, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- Funny things over at MWD: the link led me straight to degas (that is gas removal), and only then to Degas. However, as it used its own non-scientific pronunciation key the dictionary is a bit of a nonsense when it comes to pronunciations. However, the tradition of not pronouncing s at the end of a French word is not straighforward. There are many place names and personal names that retain the pronunciation of the final s. Thus, I have a strong suspicion that the final letter of Degas is pronounced. However, most dictionaries say that this letter isn't pronounced. --Gareth Hughes 13:44, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've updated the Edgar Degas article with the IPA transcription of the what I believe to be the most appropriate pronunciation. This does not have the -s pronounced. I'll keep looking for sources on this one. --Gareth Hughes 14:58, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Warfuse
I was at a local war museum the other day, taking pictures for the glory of Misplaced Pages with my trusty Cyber-shot, when I saw this captured German artillery piece (Image:Capturedgermanartillery.JPG), which I managed to identify as an M96nA, from World War I. On the blue plaque affixed to the front, it says:
GERMAN 77mm GUN Taken by 33rd Aust Battalion at WARFUSE 8 Aug 1918
I googled "Warfuse", but could find nothing helpful in English. I scoured around Misplaced Pages, looking for something relevant about that date, August 8, 1918. That was the day that the Battle of Amiens, which pitted a Canadian/Australian force against the Germans, began. I've placed the image of the gun on the Amiens page, as it seems almost certain that that was when it was captured, but I'm curious: does anyone know anything about this Warfuse place? DO'Иeil 06:59, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- It's a poorly spelled version of Warfusée, a village just outside of Amiens, now part of the municipality of Lamotte-Warfusée, Somme. --Diderot 08:29, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- Ah, alright. I had suspected that "Warfuse" was perhaps a little village near Amiens somewhere, thanks for clearing this up. —DO'Иeil 04:14, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
What came first, Catholicism or Christianity?
--66.74.170.119 10:09, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- They should have appeared at the same time -- Catholic basically means "lack of divisions", and was used by the early christians. The term Christian was coined by observers, rather than by the christians themselves, and would have been used at about the same time. If you're asking about Roman Catholic, then History of the Roman Catholic Church mentions that it started 313AD, when the Roman Empire (specicially, Emperor Constantine) adopted Christianity. Ojw 11:35, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
There are different answers to your question from different perspectives. For example, the present Roman Catholic church claims to be the original and only valid Christian church. Their official doctrinal answer would be that Christianity and Roman Catholicism began together with the spread of the Gospel by the first Apostles. From a non-Roman Catholic historical perspective and a broader definition of Christianity (all the churches who proclaim that Christ is the prinicipal historical connection between humanity and God) then you might argue that Roman Catholicism only came into being by defining itself against other groups who were also Christian. There were many different forms of Christianity in the first 3 centuries AD, some of which survived and many of which did not survive the push for hegemony by the orthodox church in the West. Finally, from a semantic perspective, you might note that no group calls itself catholic (as in universal) until it is not or has not been catholic. alteripse 12:14, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- From memory, Ignatius of Antioch (who died sometime around the beginning of the 2nd century) was the first person to use the term catholic. By it he meant the worldwide church that held fast to a consensus of revealed doctrine (i.e. excluding heretics) and obedience to one's bishop. On the other hand, the Bibile itself tells us, in the Acts of the Apostles 11.26, that the followers of Jesus were first called Christian in Antioch. This suggests that this term is older. --Gareth Hughes 19:25, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- I take your question to mean, which came first, the belief in Jesus as the son of God, or the Roman Catholic Church. If this is what you meant, there were definitely many who believed Jesus was the son of God before the formation of the Roman Catholic Church, which happend a few centuries after the death of Christ. One could even argue that some believed in Christianity prior to the birth of Jesus, in that there were many who believed in a prophecy of His birth. StuRat 20:53, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
stereotype
can you explain more about stereotype?
- More than what's in our stereotype article? Dismas| 14:39, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- The question was answered back in 2002, by contributors to the stereotype article. Talk about efficiency! It's almost like they predicted your question. Ojw 14:50, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Baseball
who invented baseball?
See Origins of baseball. —Charles P. (Mirv) 18:37, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Name of Island
What is the name of the island between South Africa and Australia, where both English and French are spoken? Thank you Pattron
- Maybe you're thinking of the Seychelles. --Gareth Hughes 20:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- "Suzy and Cecil sell seashells and C-shells by the seashore in the Seychelles."
- Or perhaps you're after Mauritius? —DO'Иeil 04:17, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well it could also be Réunion, but all these islands are not between South Africa and Australia but further north between Mozambique and Australia. Don't forget about Madagascar which the population speaks French and a local Malagasy language--Jcw69 12:26, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- Or perhaps you're after Mauritius? —DO'Иeil 04:17, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
democritus the mathematician and any link to democracy.
Sir maam I would like to know if there is any link between democritus the ancient greek mathematician that had a delemma with the atomic structure of a cone shape because he could not percieve atomic bonding other than in parralel planes hence instead of being smooth the cone would be stepped.Further to this he also believed that there was a hiarchy and that everything had its place and that there is no God. Hence you can see the relevance of my question is democracy named after him.Because if it is it might explain the reference to the devils number and it being that of a man.Also the reference to wise men and numbers(mathamatics)in the bible.Hence democracy is in oposition to God,as was its namesake.
- I doubt if democracy is named after him, more likely both his name and democracy share the same root word. As for his argument on the cylinder, he was right, it is rough at the atomic level, not smooth. Of course, the surfaces of all shapes are relatively rough at the atomic level. StuRat 21:26, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- Democracy stems from the greek words δημος (demos), meaning The people, and κρατειν (kratein), meaning to rule. I.e. it means "The rule of the people". Also, I would personally like to say that I believe that democracy is very much formed in the same spirit as christianity. Democracy preaches that all men and women everywhere are equals, none should have more power than anyone else. This is certainly in the spirit of Christ, no? gkhan 00:07, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- In relation to this, I believe the -crit- part of the name is from the Greek word κριτης (krites) meaning judge. Thus Democritus is "judge of the people". ] 14:21, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- That's quite a strange logical path you're winding. You go from "Democritus had a mathematical question which made him think there was no God" (I have no idea if this is true or not), to "If democracy is named after him, then democracy must be in opposition to God". I'm not sure I follow you on that one. --Fastfission 14:51, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Regarding the last battle scene from the movie Cleopatra
I have two questions which I would appreciate guidance to other sources of information and/or a/some webpage(s) in Misplaced Pages on the following: (1) Is the Roman general(?) "Ruffio" as called by Marc Antony (played by the late Richard Burton) a true figure in Ancient Roman history or a fictional character in the movie? If "Ruffio" was a real figure in history can you give more information on his life and military history/science especially in relation to the battle described below in (2)? (2) Was the battle between Octavion's and Agrippa's 20 legions (as described in the movie) versus Antony's and Ruffio's 2 legions true (in which Antony's and Ruffio's 2 legions desert them and in fact Ruffio is assasinated as depicted in the movie and no actual blood was shed (except Ruffio's)?) If this highly dramtic battle (in the movie) is historically true...can you give the name of this battle, when it occurred, and the military history/science of it (especially how soldiers from both sides were deployed before the fighting began). Thank you very much. Sincerely, a fan of chess and the film "Cleopatra" starring Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton.
- The article on the battle of Actium doesn't answer all your questions, but may be of use to you. --Gareth Hughes 03:05, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- Our Cleopatra article says the characters name was Rufio played by Martin Landau. According to Cleopatra: Ruling in the Shadow of Rome by Julian Morgan, Julius Caesar left an ex-slave by that name in charge of the legions in Egypt. A character by that name appeared in Caesar and Cleopatra by George Bernard Shaw. 203.26.16.66 09:29, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
That was me. Capitalistroadster 09:43, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Most of what we know about Octavian's final defeat of Mark Antony comes from the biography of the latter in Plutarch's Parallel Lives (which may not be entirely reliable). See for the Loeb translation. Note that Rufio does not appear in the ancient accounts, so perhaps his role was invented later (I note that he appears in George Bernard Shaw's 1901 play Caesar and Cleopatra; perhaps Shaw had noted the remark in Suetonius that Julius Caesar had given the command of his legions in Alexandria to the son of his freedman Rufinus). Gdr 16:34, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Federalism vs Anti-Federalism
I am trying to study on my US History and not being quite up to date on this/ I am 48 years old trying to go to school I have a couple of questions.
1. Is a Federalists the same as or close to a Republican?
2. If your not a Federalist are you a Democrat?
Please if anyone can help me with this and explain it in simple terms then please let me know.
Childofyah 03:08, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- No to both questions. While US politics has consistently split into two opposing parties (sometimes with a significant third party, as well), the issue over which the split occurs has changed over time. The original split was over whether we should have a strong central government and weak states or strong states and a weak central government. The strong central government side eventually won, then the issue moved on to pro- or anti-slavery. After the anti-slavery side won, the split became primarily economic, with Democrats on the side of the poor and Republicans on the side of the rich. A new dynamic seems to be emerging in recent years, with Republicans being on the side of a religious society and Democrats favoring secular values. It's too soon to tell if this is a permanent shift or just a temporary trend, however. StuRat 03:45, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- Democrats on the side of the poor and Republicans on the side of the rich -- Careful! It would be more correct to say that the Dems are/were in favor of higher taxes and more social programs, whereas the Republicans are/were more for tax cutbacks and reduction of social programs -- though it hasn't been quite that simple, either. And the goals of political parties have fluctuated wildly over time, so just as you can't say Anti-Federalists == Democrats, you can't say Democrats ca 1870 == Democrats now; Dems today tend to be in favor of affirmative action programs that give benefits to minorities, yet during most of the civil rights struggle of the last two centuries, they were on the side of white hegemony.
- So I guess the simplest terms I could use would be this: If you try to collaborate the political parties of today with the political parties of yesterday, you'll drive yourself bonkers. Garrett Albright 08:24, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- I stand by my statement that Democrats have been primarily on the side of the poor and Republicans on the side of the rich, at least since FDR took office. Using your example, higher taxes supported by Democrats disproportionately affect the wealthy, even if there is a future flat rate tax, and even more so under the current progressive rate. Social programs disproportionately help the poor, at least that is their goal. There are some thoughts that many social programs may actually harm people, in the long run, by encouraging dependency, but that certainly was not the intent of those programs. Republican initiatives, like reducing business and environmental regulation, also disproportionately help business owners, who tend to be wealthier than the average American. StuRat 16:27, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- I like to think of it that Democrats are more like social democrats (prefer some kind of welfare state) while neocons are free markeeters. __earth 05:52, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Our United States Federalist Party explains the history of the Federalists who were led by John Adams and Alexander Hamilton. They were opposed by the Democratic-Republican Party (United States) led by Thomas Jefferson who were called the Republicans but who who were not modern-day Republicans. Indeed, they evolved into the modern day Democratic Party (United States) at the time of Andrew Jackson. The Republican Party (United States) evolved from the United States Whig Party and their first President was Abraham Lincoln. The above articles contain more information. Capitalistroadster 09:54, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Law Codification
I would like to bring to your attention that under the section of Napoleonic Codes you have an error. Before this codification, another successful codificatoin was made in Malta under the Knights of St. John. The man who was responsible for this codification was later on also in charge of codifying the Napoleonic Code. If you would like any further information please contact me on <removed e-mail>
- We would be interested in finding out more. It may well have potential for an article or articles. Capitalistroadster 10:16, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it. You can edit almost any article on Misplaced Pages by just following the Edit link at the top of the page. We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in the sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse. Dismas| 14:33, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
New Zealand legal
Can you provide information on the penalties for shop lifting, including diversion for a first time offender without previous convictions of any sort? -- Miriam
- If you are in New Zealand, it would be better to contact your local Community Law Office, or Citizens Advice Bureau. and --inks 22:00, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
nelson
when nelson was born
Do you mean Horatio Nelson, British Admiral from Battle of Trafalgar? Nelson Mandela, South African Politician? Nelson Muntz, Simpsons Character (!)? There is a more complete list of Nelsons at Nelson. smurrayinchester 13:29, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Egypt
Explain why wood in egypt was so expensive. and tell me were you got the info from so send the link.
- This link will tell you how much forest and woodland there is in Egypt. You should then be able to work out the rest of your homework question by yourself. Shantavira 18:25, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Middle Ages
What were the natural resources of Europe during the Middle Ages?
Jenna
Please do your own homework questions. Although, there was a lot of wood. smurrayinchester 20:22, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- Can't you be locked up for suggesting "a lot of wood" to a schoolgirl? Majts 23:56, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- No, but you can for making jokes like that. DJ Clayworth 18:55, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
I Imagine the same as they have now only more. Their was also many wild animals such as bears and Wolfs.
The Jewish Tabernacle
I am doing a special school project on making the Jewish tabernacle. I've looked everywhere on the internet and I'm still confused on the outer design on the tabernacle. It's supposed to be a cheribum (a winged angel) but I've got 2 different pictures with 2 different design neither in the deisgn of a cheribum or anything near it. Would you pleas help me by supplying an accurate design because I don't want to get a bad grade because of a pattern error... The Student
- Is that the same as the Temple of David ? StuRat 01:57, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Are you constructing it according to the instructions in Exodus? No one knows what a cherubim looked like, so you can't flunk unless your teacher is certain he knows and made a big deal out of telling you exactly why he knows. Most modern depictions use a conventional 19th century angel images, a "guy in a robe with wings". Here are google image searches for tabernacle or cherubim . alteripse 11:41, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
guys, you are confusing tabernacle (the tent) with the Ark of the Covenant (the box with cherubim). Also "Jewish Tabernacle" is a bit of an anachronism. It should more properly be called "Hebrew Tabernacle". 17:05, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
How so? I know the difference and assumed he was referring to the one with detailed specs from exodus, and wanted pictures of cherubim so he could put the ark in the tabernacle. alteripse 17:43, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Vostok1 patch
I am wondering what the letters are on the side of the ball(space pod) in the patch. I believe it might be CCCp but am not sure. I need to know for a project I am doing. --sarah
- Yep, you are correct, CCCP stands for Союз Советских Социалистических Республик which is USSR in Cyrillic Majts 23:23, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
HELP! I need some information on Upton Sinclair.....
Hi! I need to find out what Upton Sinclair's height and weight were when he died. Do you happen to know where I can find this info??? I have searched and searched for this and cannot find it. If you find it, can you email me at ??? Thanks!!!
numismatist, what does it mean?
Someone who studies and/or collects (for other than value as money) coins and currency. See Numismatics.
Automatic ?drawing?
Can someone give me the name of the museum or a link to it's website in which I can find the Czechoslovakian, or Czech artwork of a cult from the mid to late 20th century where they used a trance like state to draw creatures from other worlds? phew. I know the cult was from Czechoslovakia and they denounced alcohol, tobacco, drugs, and even sex. If anyone could shine any light on this it would be great!! - Joe
Concentration Camp No. 333 in Poland
My father was in subject concentration camp in 1943-44 as an Italian Army officer. In reading his memoirs I find that it was near a town called Beniaminswo or Beniaminsovo or Beniaminowo. His writing is very small and difficult to make out. I am trying to locate that concentration camp geographically by locating the town it was near. If anyone who knows Poland well can shed some light on this, I would appreciate it. george68.220.84.89 01:27, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- Here is a map showing where Beniaminow is. Stalag 333 was located there. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 02:19, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- Note that you need to zoom in one step to see the name of the town. StuRat 02:30, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- Stalag 333 was originally in Ostrow-Komorowo, Poland from 03/1942 to 09/1943 and was then moved to Beniaminow, Poland until it's closure in 01/1944, according to this site:
- This site has an interesting document, it's a postcard from there, apparently just to notify the family that Danilo Pasotto was a Prisoner of War at that site:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH - YOU HAVE MADE A HUGE DIFFERENCE. I MAY EVEN DECIDE TO TRAVEL THERE AND SEE IT FOR MYSELF - THANK YOU AGAIN
What is Hartz IV
Hartz IV. David Sneek 12:30, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Social and Political Background
What does general socail and political back ground mean
What does general social and political Backgrounds.
- Is this a homework question? If so, for what grade level or age group? AlMac| 20:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Urban Anthropology
Hi
I am looking for information which will help me with an assignment i have to observe a community (Small for a short period of Time) i am looking for help to find good books and website any help apopreciated.
- What level of schooling is this an assignment for? Most of the handbooks on anthropological methodology are for the graduate or postgraduate level and won't make any sense to people who aren't already well-read in the field. Unfortunately, I don't know of any good web resources offhand for this sort of thing at the level you are probably looking for it (sounds like a good candidate for a Wikibook, if someone wants to write one!). --Fastfission 03:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
what is the schuman declaration?
We have an article on the Schuman Declaration. Does that help? KeithD (talk) 16:44, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Sailors and Explorers
Name some explorers of the 15th century?
- We're not here to do your homework for you, but you could look at 15th century. Also, remember that the 15th century covers the years 1401-1500, so don't get confused and look at dates of 15xx.-gadfium 20:31, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Henry the Navigator John and Sebastian Cabot. Vasco De Gamma
North Korean motto
In the North Korea article, it used to say that the motto is "One is sure to win if one believes in and depends upon the people (translation)." I removed it because I couldn't find the original version, nor verify it. Even the editors in the Korean Misplaced Pages couldn't find the source nor the original. Can anyone verify this? Thanks. -- pmam21articles 17:37, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, that sounds somewhat like someone trying to summarise the concept of juche, which I suspect is where it came from. Shimgray | talk | 23:09, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
turkish
what year did the turkish invade algeria ? :)
- ,:| ? The Ottoman Empire gained control over Maghreb under Suleiman the Magnificent. --Diderot 20:00, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
I myself am not sure but History of Ottoman Algeria might help. __earth 14:31, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Lunar Months in the Celtic Calender
In the Celtic lunar calendar each lunar month corresponds to a letter, which in turn corresponds to a tree. How do these designations correspond, (roughly), to our own twelve month year?
- Check Celtic calendar. There are a couple of good external links that may help you. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ 19:56, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
From Dec. 24 | Birch |
22 Jan - | Rowan |
19 Feb - | Ash |
19 Mar - | Alder |
16 Apr - | Willow |
14 May - | Hawthorn |
11 Jun - | Oak |
9 Jul - | Holly |
6 Aug - | Hazel |
3 Sep - | Vine |
1 Oct - | Ivy |
29 Oct - | Reed |
26 Nov - | Elder |
Can an Arab be a Jew or a Jew be an Arab?
The articles on Arab and Jew explain some of the different definitions. These different definitions mean that no clear and definite answer can be given to the question. However, of particular note are the Mizrahi and Sephardi who are Arabic-speaking Jews. KeithD (talk) 20:50, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- (written before edit conflict) One can be of Arab descent and be a follower of Judaism, sure. I guess if your father is of Arab descent and your mother is Jewish, you'd be an Arabic Jew. You can also be a Jew for Jesus. Or a Arabic Christian. The thing is, Judaism is a religion and the Jews are an ethnic group, whereas Arabs are an ethnic group, but not a religion. Does that make sense? Brian Schlosser42 20:54, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- Both Arabs & Jews (ethnically) are semitic peoples too (semitic race, don't know the right terinology). AllanHainey 07:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- It depends very much by what meaning is intended by the words "Arab" and "Jew". Broad social categories of this type entail non-trivial ambiguities, which are to some extent covered in Misplaced Pages articles. "Arab", taken as a question of national citizenship in a formally or informally Arab state, means that just as there are French Jews and American Jews, there can also be Arab Jews. Although the number of people this defintion can cover has been fairly small since the expulsions and immigrations following 1948, it is non-zero.
- "Arab" seen as an ethnicity is more difficult. "French" and "American" are not viewed as ethnic labels by all of the people they apply to, so some Jews and non-Jews do not view being a French Jew as implying being ethnically French, while the notion of anyone being ethnically American is fairly strongly discouraged in modern America. Opinions vary, both among Jews and non-Jews, about the applicability of various ethnic labels to Jews. However, language preference is often used as a surrogate for ethnic identity among Arabs. By this criterion, many Jews would qualify as Arabs, since there is a large Arabic-speaking Jewish population, But it is probable that few Arabic-speaking Jews would choose to identify themselves in this manner, and no doubt many Arabs would reject such an identification as well in the current political climate.
- Judaism seen as a religious quality, however, poses an entirely different set of boundary issues. Yes, people who identify themselves as ethically, linguistically or nationally as Arab can convert to Judaism. I do not know how many such people exist but I presume the number to be larger than zero. Also, given the current political conditions, I do not know if such people would identify themselves as Arabs, or if they would prefer to see the adoption of Judaism as a larger change of identity. I expect different people see things in different ways.
- Ultimately, I suspect that not too many people would identify themselves as "Arab Jews" and that current conditions would discourage most of those to whom one or more of the above definitions might apply from doing so. But, it is not logically incoherent under any of the usual definitions of "Arab" or "Jew" to be an "Arab Jew". However, it is highly ambiguous in isolation exactly what such an identity might entail. --Diderot 08:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Massachusetts Bay Colony
A bay can be the colour of a horse, a herb, a gulf of water, a region of Somalia or a high official of the Egyptian 19th Dynasty. A colony might mean the settling of new land, but often requires the forceable removable of that land's previous inhabitants (if you do not believe in aliens, try space colonization). Otherwise, lots of animals, insects and assorted organisms live in colonies. Colony also happens to be a cracking good album of Swedish melodic death metal. As for masachusits, I've never heard of it. It may be that I'm spelling it wrongly, but it sounds like an Indian name, perhaps introduced into the English language during the Raj. Enjoy! --Gareth Hughes 23:19, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
the grachus reforms
what were the grachus reforms of rome?--66.213.25.12 22:42, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- See Tiberius Gracchus, and note that there are two c's in the name. --Gareth Hughes 22:57, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
friends of the mansion
What are the steps in the Unites States Election process?
What are the steps in the Unites States Election Process?
- The steps are outlined in the articles on U.S. presidential election ad midterm elections. --Gareth Hughes 23:26, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- Then you can hop from them to Elections in the United States. --Gareth Hughes 23:29, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
William Penn and treaties with Indians
I am looking for the text of any treaty with the Indians written by William Penn. Is there the exact wording somewhere? It is said Penn's treaties were the only ones never broken with Native Americans (in his lifetime. Thanks!
Ark of the Covenant
- See Ark of the Covenant. Or, alternatively, Raiders of the Lost Ark. --Fastfission 03:36, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Earthquake of 1822 in Chile
Was there really a gigantic earthquake in Chile, as the 1822 article says? I searched the web, but couldn't find it, apart from copies of that same article and some typos. Common Man 03:38, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
"As communication between various parts of the world became more common, earthquake observations from throughout the world could be combined. Following an earthquake in Chile in 1822, the author Maria Graham reported systematic changes in the elevation of the Chilean coastline. Observations of coastline changes were confirmed following the 1835 Chilean earthquake by Robert FitzRoy, captain of the H.M.S. Beagle, while Charles Darwin was onshore examining the geology of the Andes." Capitalistroadster 03:59, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Thank you! Maybe that should be in its own article? Now I The area of 100000 square miles of new land added seems very big, though - I wouldn't feel comfortable putting that in an article without a proper source. Common Man 04:19, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
It would certainly be worthwhile having an article. Although I am not an expert on geology, 100,000 square miles in new land seems a bit excessive to me. Capitalistroadster 05:11, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- This source states "on November 19, 1822, a three-minute major earthquake and the resulting three consecutive 12-foot tsunamis devastated the port of Valparaiso's main buildings, destroying most of the churches and seven hundred homes." I agree that the 100000 sq miles claim is more than dubious. That's a third of the land area of Chile and that sort of land movement would have surely caused a Megatsunami Majts 05:19, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks - I deleted that claim, referring to this discussion. Common Man 05:49, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Tips on drawing familiar human faces
What sort of tips you guys would give me to draw a human face in a way it resembles a familiar one? What are the major features people usually notice? I've seen people draw a few lines and ta-dah, it's a caricature of you or someone you know. I studied tons of these but couldn't find what sort of aspects they capture. I could think of shape of head, position of eyes, nose and lips, but it's hardly been useful for me.
Anyone experienced in drawing human faces could give me a few hints? I'm sick of sucking at drawing faces and practicing is not really the problem. I just came to that moment I realized I need some formal knowledge on the subject to go to the next level. I looked up for face drawing tutorials but they're too... Well, not specific on this subject, so not very helpful. :/ ☢ Kieff | Talk 05:06, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- As you've already identified, proportion and placement of the facial features is very important in creating a recognisable specific face. There are lots of little cues we use to identify faces, but these are among the most important. If you are new to drawing faces, I would strongly recommend you to use guidelines if you aren't already. All too often new artists think that using guidelines to draw is somehow cheating, or something that 'real artists' don't do. In truth, they're vital for establishing positioning and proportion of features. Any basic drawing tutorial should be able to tell you how to set out guidelines for head and face construction.
- Also, on a practical level of finding out where you're going wrong, here's a few ideas:
- Get a photograph of your subject, and without studying the photograph, draw their face. Once you're done, compare your drawing to the photograph and try and identify point-by-point where they differ - have you drawn the head too round? the lips too small? etc.
- Try tracing over a photograph of your subject loosely to get an idea of shape and proportion for the features. Trace some other subjects too and examine how they differ from each other - what makes each one recognisably unique?
- Also learning to draw facial expressions will help in identifying the difference ways in which the same face can vary in appearance.
- Caricature exaggerates the defining features of a person, so it can be a very good way to learn to pick out such features.
- Most of all though, practice. You'll get there in the end. And don't worry about those 'masterpiece in one stroke' artists - they had to start at the start too. :) Noodhoog 15:00, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- I'm no artist, but I think it's important to distinguish doing a realistic picture of a person's face and doing a caricature. A caricature is not realistic; it exaggerates to provide a direct linkage to recogition. So, you need to be very sure you know which you are aiming for. Now, while they are different, I think it would be possibly instructive to try and do both, maybe side by side for the same original. As you do it, I think you would learn something in each process that teaches you more about the opposite process. If you are struggling to do semi-realistic caricature, maybe it's worth trying to do really wild ones to work on invididual traits. Hope this helps. Notinasnaid 19:10, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
what is a bothey
A misspelling of bothy. KeithD (talk) 10:01, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Why were Nazis a 'socialist workers party'?
I know the National Socialists were rabidly anti-marxist, anti-communist, anti-bosheiveik, etc. Additionally, I know they were against class warfare and instead all about uniting all classes behind nationalism. So, without getting into the minefield of whether 'nazism' is a type of 'socialism'-- assuming for the moment that it is not, can someone answer this: Why did the Nazi party, which was so anti-marxism, choose a name which, to the modern ear at least, sounds so marxist/communist/socialist? In the name "National Socialist German Workers Party", sure National and German make perfect sense, but where did Socialist Workers come from? To use an analogy, it's almost as if the Ku Klux Klan were to spontaneously name themselves the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Is this confusion merely a product of 'mistranslation' from german to english or from 1920s to 2005? Would a 1920s german citizen, upon hearing the name NSDAP for the very first time, assume it was a marxist party, only later finding out otherwise? Or did words like Socialist and Worker only later become synonmous with marxism. Alternatively, if the party name was indeed confusing to germans, why did the nazis choose such a name for their party? Alecmconroy 11:00, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- The articles on National Socialist German Workers Party and Austrian National Socialism explain the origins of the name and the parties. This paragraph from the article on Nazism probably sums it up best of all:
- "It is important to note that the Nazi Party's conception of international economics was very limited. As the National Socialist in the name NSDAP suggests, the party's primary motivation was to incorporate previously international resources into the Reich by force, rather than by trade (compare to the international socialism as practiced by the Soviet Union and the COMECON trade organization). This made international economic theory a supporting factor in the political ideology rather than a core plank of the platform as it is in most modern political parties." KeithD (talk) 11:23, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- The Communist Manifesto discusses and dismisses various forms of socialism, not all of which are purely left-wing. In fact, the Nazi policy of a large, centralised government, and the emphasis on society (the state) above the individual was in many ways quite socialist. Also, remember that the Nazis were not primarily drawn from the traditional ruling class (which was perceived to have failed), and could have been seen as movement of and for the workers in the political atmosphere at the end of the First World War. --Gareth Hughes 12:12, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Please do excuse me for not replying entirely on-topic, but you may be interested in controversial German historian Götz Aly's new theory: Hitler was perhaps, quite ironically, a socialist. Cf. if you can handle French, or this review of the book — titled Hitlers Volksstaat (Hitler's People's State) — in which the theory is put forward. Grumpy Troll 15:22, 11 October 2005 (UTC).
All this is correct, but the short answer is that Hitler and his henchmen took over a weak party which if I remember correctly he had been sent to spy on for the Wiemar government.
- I think you will find it was a rogue unit of the German Army (see Adolf_Hitler#Early_Nazi_Party) operating more or less independently of the Weimar Government (which was at that time the Weimar Coalition of Social Democrats, Liberals and Catholics) which Hitler was working for. The name was only changed to National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) after Hitler joined. When he joined it was the German Workers' Party (DAP) - so he didn't inherit the name, he was one of the people who changed it to NSDAP.
- You might also consider the influence of Oswald Spengler on Nazism, particularly his 1920 book Preußentum und Sozialismus (Prussia and Socialism) which proposed a synthesis of nationalist and socialist ideas. The more 'socialist' of the leading early Nazis (e.g. Ernst Röhm) were largely disposed of in the Night of the Long Knives leaving Hitler able to cosy up to the military, industrialists and haute bourgeoisie. Valiantis 23:11, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
enterprenuership
what is the difference between a job and work?--217.113.72.39 11:45, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Work can be defined as the integral of dot product of force times infinitesimal translation. However, in the context you intend, "I'm going to work" and "I'm going to my job" are interchangeable. Note that work can also be a verb; "I've got to work at my job" means much the same thing. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 13:13, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Also, a job generally implies that you are getting paid. Slaves definitely did work but few would agree that they had a "job" and very few people call Volunteer work or work done on their own home a "job". -Drdisque 14:58, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Health Care and Canada
I'm doing a paper on the canadian health care, privatization-Why or Why not. do you have any articles that would be helpful to understand the issue. I'm answering the question from the point, not to privatize, because of the social/economic ramifications that whould affed the low income canadians who would not be able to affort privite health care costs. thank you Annette cannette@ca.inter.net
- You could start out at Health care in Canada and go from there... Dismas| 13:28, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- A comparison with Health care in the United States, which is privatized, might also be beneficial. StuRat 00:01, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Presidents of The United States of America
To Whom It May Concern,
Firstly, let me congratulate you on this fantastic service. I only discovered it a couple of weeks ago, and already it is one of my favourite websites! A marvellous resource.
Secondly, my question: In your biography of George Walker Bush, unless I'm misreading it you say that he is the second son of a previous president to take office himself. If I am correct in this interpretation, can you tell me who were the first father and son double act?
Many thanks, keep up the good work.
- John Adams and his son John Quincy Adams the second and sixth presidents. Brian Schlosser42 14:03, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Thank you, Brian!
JAPAN EVOLUTION
looking for info on expansions of imperialistic expansion. During 1894-1910
A survey of societies and cultures in Africa south of the sahara.
Africa claims to be the pace setter in development but it is still one of the most deprived continents.Discuss.
- The top of this page says Do your own homework. Discuss. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 16:02, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
MLB Player Arrest s since 1990
Where can I find a list of all Major League Baseball players who have been arrested since 1990?
John Forbes Nash Jr.
I would like to know the actual residence place and actual age of the famous mathematician.
- As the John Forbes Nash article says, he currently holds an appointment in mathematics at Princeton, and so he presumably either lives there or nearby. It also says he was born 13 June 1928. KeithD (talk) 16:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Looking for print from a public domain image in an article
Hello,
I am looking for a high resolution file or print of the image found in this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Godunov_map.jpg
Where can I find this?
Steve SRHookEm 18:26, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Your best best is to ask Ghirlandajo, the user who uploaded it, on his talk page. - Mgm| 21:58, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Spain´s position on drug trafficking
I would like to know more about drug problems in Spain and its political position on this issue. Thank you in advance
---Cornelia Habekost---
- The CIA world factbook is always good for that sort of thing, as they take a perverse interest in illegal (to them) drugs.
- The Spain page says "key European gateway country and consumer for Latin American cocaine and North African hashish entering the European market; destination and minor transshipment point for Southwest Asian heroin; money laundering site for European earnings of Colombian narcotics trafficking organizations". Ojw 20:53, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- That doesn't, of course, mean that the Spanish government approves of any of those activities! -- Arwel 21:44, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
how did people think about religion in the 1850's
- (Reply) Which people, where in the world? Notinasnaid 19:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
You may want to check Reformation though the period is about 400 years earlier. If this doesn't help, I'm sorry. Like Notinasnaid, needs more info. __earth 05:46, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- 1850 might be a bit late for the Reformation. As Notinasnaid noted, it would be useful to specify which people you are referring to. Capitalistroadster 05:55, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
why lady of justice is a female
The personification of justice comes from the figure of the Roman goddess Justitia, who, in turn, derives some qualities from her Greek counterpart, Themis. The modern personification is often depicted blindfolded, to suggest that she is impartial (she sees no favouritism), and usually carries a balance in her hand. --Gareth Hughes 19:36, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
how where romans entertained
Do you mean how were Romans' entertained? By going to the movies of course : see Ben Hur and Gladiator. Also see the article on Roman_eating_and_drinking Majts 19:39, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Also, Culture of Ancient Rome will keep you busy. However, today, Romans tend to go to a football match, watch television and eat well. --Gareth Hughes 19:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- The short answer is that Romans were entertained with panem et circenses — literally "bread and circuses". Grumpy Troll 19:56, 11 October 2005 (UTC).
- I hear orgies were pretty entertaining. Caligula was a particular indulger. --Ballchef 05:58, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- And a recent edition of QI revealed that there's no evidence that they watched Christians being fed to lions, which has rather put the dampeners on my campaign to revive the practice. --bodnotbod 03:45, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
romans
Why did the romans build hadrians wall ?
- Read Hadrian's Wall. However, the wall wasn't built, as is popularly thought, to keep the Picts out, but to control trade and traffic throughout the region either side of the wall. --Gareth Hughes 19:39, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Game: Rabbit-Lion (also known as Angel-Devil?)
I am trying to find information about this group game. (I have already searched through the article game and related categories.) Here is how the game works: It is usually played outdoors (or in an area with lots of space). It requires a bare-minimum of three players, and there is no maximum. First each person picks (without telling anyone) two other people - one who is thier 'Lion' or 'Devil' (the person they have to stay away from) and one who is their 'Rabbit' or 'Angel' (the person who protects them). Then, once everyone has selected a Devil and an Angel, the game starts, and everyone begins moving around, each person trying to keep their Angel in between them and their Devil. Sometimes the game stabilizes quickly (everyone stops moving, everyone is protected) and sometimes it never stabilizes. After everyone stops or everyone is just too tired to keep moving, each person goes around an says who is their Devil and who is their Angel.
Questions: Anyone know if there is already a wikipedia article about this game? If not, what other names is this game called? What category does it fit into on the article game? Thank you, 128.208.191.208 20:27, 11 October 2005 (UTC).
- I would add it under playground game but I haven't heard of it before. --bodnotbod 03:50, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
User:AlMac asks about Supreme Court of the United States
I became curious what is different about the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court (who is now John Roberts) vs. the eight Associate Justices.
I assume if they have any internal disputes, the Chief Justice is the chief arbiter. A lot of what I am finding, seems to me to be no big deal, such as
- The Chief Justice is paid a little more and has some extra administrative duties.
- Each Justice has one vote, but the Chief Justice assigns who gets to write up the results of each vote, when the Chief is in the majority.
- quote: Each Justice on the Supreme Court is assigned to at least one of the United States' thirteen judicial circuits. The Chief Justice is usually allotted to the District of Columbia Circuit, the Federal Circuit and the Fourth Circuit; each Associate Justice is allotted to one or two judicial circuits. unquote.
- Serves as the head of several government institutions, both judicial and like the Smithsonian Institution.
- Often administers oath of office for the inauguration of the President, although this can be done by other people.
- When the justices are in conference, and someone knocks on the door, the most junior Associate Judge must answer it.
while some other stuff is extremely important, in my opinion
- Appoints members of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) secret court.
- Presides at the Senate when it tries an impeachment of the President of the United States or the Vice President when Acting President
Do I have a good picture of the differences, and what is special about the Chief Justice? Some of the articles on this seem to be a bit of a stub. AlMac| 21:34, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
He's Chief Justice of the United States, not Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Is there anything left out of that article? - Nunh-huh 22:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Ireland
I would like to ask you about the tipical dress in Ireland--~~
- I hear in Ireland they like to go round naked on frosty winter mornings... Seriously, modern Irish people dress pretty much like other people living in developed countries; any differences are likely to be relatively subtle. --Robert Merkel 00:59, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- They are more likely to wear raincoats than, say, Nevada. DJ Clayworth 18:42, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
music
What is a block chord--Helen harty 02:11, 12 October 2005 (UTC)Helen harty
Sociology
Hey there, I'm doing a report for my sister. What are the critisms and weaknesses of marxism and functionalism?
- Interesting form of home schooling? Well, as it says at the top of the page, we don't do peoples homework for them. But you might want to start your research at Marxism and Functionalism. Dismas| 04:21, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- It says "Do your own homework". Nothing about doing someone elses...--Commander Keane 14:44, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Who is Esamun
Someone please help, I have been searching for days. I have an Art History assignment due, and one of the questions is: How is Esamun associated with art history, history or archeology. I can't find anything on this guy. Could someone please help me. Who is he, or where do I find information on him. Thank You
I suspect you have the name wrong. Have you actually seen Esamun in print from your teacher? alteripse 05:10, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- This bibliography from the Griffith Institute mentions an Esamun, "Prophet of Montu lord of Thebes, Member of the phyle of the temple of Re-Harakhti"—does that seem right? Has your course covered Egyptian art at all? —Charles P. (Mirv) 05:17, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- or Schliemann, Heinrich? - Nunh-huh 05:27, 12 October 2005 (UTC) (from the Department of Loose Associations Department).
Pronunciation of Monet's famous French village
Have searched dictionaries and been unable to find any indications of the pronunciation of the famous French village where Monet's home and gardens are located. Have heard mostly - Ghee'-ver-nee" - but - Ghi-vair"-nee - seems a likely possibility, as pronunciation for Giverny. What say you? 205.188.116.14 05:23, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Try zhee-vair-nee, where "zh" is the sound of the "s" in "pleasure". It's a good approximation of the French pronunciation. --Diderot 06:30, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Do note however, that in the French language, the letter r is pronounced — how could one put it? — more gutturally than in English, so to say (much like in Spanish). (Should you understand IPA, I am sure someone knowledgeable in the subject, such as Angr, will be able to formally indicate how it is pronounced.) Grumpy Troll 10:42, 12 October 2005 (UTC).
- I've just added the IPA pronunciation to the Giverny article. I hope the Parisian r is acceptable. --Gareth Hughes 10:48, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- It is if you're Parisian. My dialect is a bit more uvular and trilled - more guttural than the Parisian velar "r". Orrr you coeude prrronounce eet lahke an ol' prêtre frrrome Gaspé... Misplaced Pages should probably endeavor to show IPA for the more standard dialects where feasible, but the question "How do I pronounce this weird foreign word?" usually implies "How do I pronounce it when I don't know that language and don't want to sound like some hick idiot?" --Diderot 11:51, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've just added the IPA pronunciation to the Giverny article. I hope the Parisian r is acceptable. --Gareth Hughes 10:48, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Do note however, that in the French language, the letter r is pronounced — how could one put it? — more gutturally than in English, so to say (much like in Spanish). (Should you understand IPA, I am sure someone knowledgeable in the subject, such as Angr, will be able to formally indicate how it is pronounced.) Grumpy Troll 10:42, 12 October 2005 (UTC).
american citizenship quiz
1.What ist the title of the person who is 3rd in line in the succession of the presidents?
2.Who was the only president never elected to the position?
How many terms can a Senator serve?
How long is a Senator's term?
(1) Our Order of succession article states that the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives is third in line.
(2) Gerald Ford.
(3) Our United States Senate article states that Senators can serve until they resign, die or are defeated in while running reelection. Some Senators such as Strom Thurmond have served for a very long time.
(4) Six years.
Capitalistroadster 06:06, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, if this is going to be about citizenship quizzes, here's a few questions I think ought to be answerable from Misplaced Pages, but I don't think they can be:
- The United States is currently in a State of Emergency declared by the President, and has been continuously for over 50 years. What executive findings are the source of currently active states of emergency, and which piece of legislation authorises the President to issue those findings? (I only know the answer to the second half of the question.)
- Native Americans were not automatically considered citizens of the United States until the 1920s, and were previously barred from becoming naturalised Americans through ordinary immigration processes. Was this extension of citizenship the result of a specific act of Congress or an application of the 14th amendment? Does this decision empower the US government to unilaterally reevaluate treaties made with aboriginal nations?
- The children of US citizens born abroad are usually considered Americans by birth and do not need to be naturalised in order to enjoy a right of abode on US territory. There is one broad class of exception. Under what conditions must the naturally born children of US citizens be naturalised in order to become US citizens?
- Do the state courts have the power to enforce and interpret international treaties signed by the federal government (which is alone empowered to negotiate with foreign powers)? Treaties which are ratified by the federal Congress have the status of US federal law and are binding on US states in as much as those treaties involve powers assigned to the federal government in the Constitution. However, there is a US state whose constitution and state supreme court have interpreted a particular international treaty as having stricter terms than the federal government's interpretation. Which state and treaty is it? (Hint: it has to do with official languages.)
- After years of hearing Americans gripe about how few natural US citizens can pass the citizenship test, I thought I might come up with a few other questions touching on basic issues of authority and status under US law. This ought to be a mite more interesting. I should note for the record that I am not myself a US citizen, although I lived in the US for 17 years and am married to an American. --Diderot 07:46, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Government entities making donations?
The Town of Velma is a government entity, therefore they cannot donate property and must sell to the highest bidder
The above is the answer to a question asked the Town of Velma. I assume it is in Oklahoma since that is what the Ebay description. I don't believe it cannot donate property to a individual or organization since they the ability to recieve property as a donnation?
I don't mind the word no but being mislead or lied to as being law is grounds for a suit or call to the ACLU? Or?
- For the eBay item in question, see this link. — JIP | Talk 07:35, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- It would not be surprising for a government to work under a policy, or law, requiring them to follow strict procedures when procuring or disposing of property, such as an open and competitive bidding process and the need to deal with the lowest-bidding vendor and highest-bidding buyer. Such laws are usually put into place to prevent cronyism, guard against corruption and generally safeguard the use of taxpayer money. In fact, such laws may be the result of lawsuits or complaints, so I doubt you'll have much success in suing them, but of course only a lawyer could tell you for sure. I'm guessing that perhaps you are representing a charitable organization that feels it would be a worthy recipient of this ambulance as a donation. If so, you might contact a local service organization to see if they would buy it and give it to you. Sharkford 18:29, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
how many muslims are there in the world
(preceding unsigned comment by 202.84.232.75 (talk · contribs) 08:28, 12 October 2005)
- Somewhere in the neighborhood of one billion (1,000,000,000). Estimates vary; see Demographics of Islam for the CIA's numbers and Islam#The demographics of Islam today for some others. —Charles P. (Mirv) 08:40, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Enquiry
Is it all right to say that Indian exist as a nation only after British has created it? shuhui
- British India started way back in the 18th century, courtesy of British East India Company __earth 13:03, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- India in its present form existed only from 1947 when Britain left & India, Pakistan & Bangladesh became countries in their own right. Before that there was the British Raj and before that the Mughal Empire were the political powers in the Indian sub-continent. AllanHainey 13:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- More correctly, of course, India and Pakistan became countries in their own right in 1947. Bangladesh only came into existence in December 1970 when it broke away from Pakistan. -- Arwel 22:05, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Don't forget the Chola! So, really, it's hard to say when India started. I would say that modern India started with British India. Is that appropiate? __earth 09:31, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- More correctly, of course, India and Pakistan became countries in their own right in 1947. Bangladesh only came into existence in December 1970 when it broke away from Pakistan. -- Arwel 22:05, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- India in its present form existed only from 1947 when Britain left & India, Pakistan & Bangladesh became countries in their own right. Before that there was the British Raj and before that the Mughal Empire were the political powers in the Indian sub-continent. AllanHainey 13:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Pom Pom sock
Two questions here really. First to make sure im talking about the right thing Pom Pom sock is a sock the has a little ball attached to the rear where it would meet your ankle. SO the first question is that what a pom pom sock is. and the second question is what is the little pom pom for?
- Yes, and for decoration. — File:Ontario trillium sig.pngmendel ☎ 17:58, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Decorative though it may be, it keeps the sock from falling into your shoe, which short socks are otherwise prone to do. Sharkford 18:11, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Earl Warren
I would like to know why Earl Warren was selected to become Chief Justice. What was his background? Who appointed him?
- The article about him will answer your last two questions. As for why Eisenhower appointed him, this letter may shed some light. —Charles P. (Mirv) 12:00, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Quakers and Japanese Internment
I would like to know what role Quakers played in the issue of Japanese Internment. How did they oppose this? What specific things did they do during this period to help the situation?
Ratification of the Bretton Woods Agreement Act
What is the date of the US Congress' ratification of the 1945 Bretton Woods Agreement Act ??? It may be 31 July 1945 (or is that the date it came into effect or are both dates the same?)
Location of Fort Balkley
Where was Fort Balkley built? Is it in American or Canadian territory? I can't find any references, and all the articles on Google are the same.
- The article on Fort Balkley appears to be either a hoax or fiction without context, so it's no wonder you can't find any references. —Charles P. (Mirv) 13:09, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
market
what are two companies in an oligopolistic market?
- Two sellers? A duopoly, I guess.
- I think the poster wants two examples in a given market, but that fairly strongly resembles homework. However, it should be easy to find: Check oligopoly, identify an industry or market, and pick any two major companies. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 15:16, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Canonical "silent movie" music
I've been trying to find the names of two pieces of music which are associated in my mind with silent movies, and I can't think of any other context in which I've heard them. I'm starting to think that they aren't complete pieces, but rather musical phrases that the accompanist would pick out for a few bars at the appropriate moment. I think they are instantly recognisable if I can only describe them. I can't turn them into notes, but they are
1. Action/chase music. Five fast half beats, pause, repeat half beats, pause. Four full beats, down-up down-up(?). The same four beats, reversed(?).
2. Sinister music. Five slow beats, ascending except for the last; four faster beats descending.
Thanks in advance, Notinasnaid 14:10, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- I think I know the one you mean with #2, for which you'd typically picture someone creeping along on tiptoes . I was taught to play that as part of very basic piano lessons at school many years ago, and the teacher referred to it as "spooks". I've no idea if that's it's correct name, or who it's by though Noodhoog 14:38, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- I too can hear the second one in my mind, also used a lot in Warner Brothers cartoons if I recall correctly. I'm afraid I can't name it either. --bodnotbod 03:55, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
19th century novels
Why do some 19th century novels disguise the name of a certain person or certain place by using only a partial discriptor and then using an underline to complete the name but in other instances use the full name or location. For instance, in Jane Austin's the region where the militia are from is written as _____shire and Lord John____ is used. At other times the names of towns, areas and people are used in full. 64.80.116.131 15:53, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- It keeps the fiction generic. If an author writes Lincolnshire, someone can become overly obsessive and complain that it didn't really happen there. If an author writes Sherbetshire, that same reader can complain that it doesn't exist at all. It could also be, particularly in the case of names, that a satirical or political point is being made without being overt. The practice is also frequently found in science fiction; an author might describe the first manned Martian landing in 20__ with the story set five years later to prevent premature dating such as 2001: A Space Odyssey. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 16:54, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Proper Title for the Grandson of a King
King X has a son and three daughters. The second daughter is married to a soldier of the capital guard, but their son keeps the King's family name instead of his father's. Would the son of the daughter of the King be a Lord? What military responsibilities, etc. might he have? The eldest, the son of King X, married and had children when said son of daughter of King was in his late teenaged years. Any information you can give me for any Middle Ages/etc. European country would be helpful.
- Things like this really aren't very prescriptive, and were less so still in the Middle Ages. People were frequently created Dukes, Barons, etc. at the whim of the monarch, and occasionally had their nobility removed (although this was commonly accompanied by the removal of their head too). Modern royal families have accumulated a big bag of titles which they distribute to their kids (sometimes there's a pattern to it, sometimes not). Descendants of women get a rougher deal in many monarchies: you'll note that Peter Mark Andrew Phillips, the son of the daughter of a monarch, isn't in the royal family and has no title, as he's a female line descendent (but the Queen could, if she wanted make him the Duke of Drumchapel or something if she wanted, just as she could make any other British person). The only limit on the monarch's power to do stuff like this is the same as the limits on any non-totalitarian monarch - in particular, the monarch often has to keep powerful peers on side (and they might get a bit narked if the King elevates some yokel into being a Duke and puts him in charge of the army). Duke of York is one title that keeps getting pulled out of the British royals' big bag'o'titles. It's all politics, really. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 17:34, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Slavery in the US
How could a black slave become a free man and how could he be recognized as such?
- Many ways. Here are a few:
- They could buy their freedom. This, of course, assumes that their owners allowed them to earn and keep money. Many did so, either out of sympahy or because they reasoned they would get more work out of a slave working diligently to earn their freedom than one with no hope for the future. Papers would be given to them listing them as free.
- Their owners could set them free to reward them for "years of loyal service". This was frequently done after the death of the owner, and was a term in their wills. Papers would be given to them in this case, too.
- Some slaves were given their freedom for a particular act, such as saving the life of the children of the owner. Papers would be given to them in this case, too.
- They could escape to a place where slavery was illegal. The North did not allow slavery in its states, but did return runaway slaves under the Fugitive slave laws, so wasn't completely safe. Canada did not return runaway slaves, so was the destination of many.
- Some slaves were promised their freedom for joining the Confederate Army.
- During the Civil War, slaves in Confederate-held territories were technically freed as a result of the Emancipation Proclamation and actually freed once those areas were taken by the Union.
- All slaves were freed as a result of the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1865. At that point all former slaves were free, so no documents were needed to distinguish between freemen and slaves.
StuRat 17:46, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Fall of the Roman Empire and Christianity
Do you know how many Christians were left in Britain after the fall of the Roman Empire?
Burns, OR circa 1900
I'm currently writing a novel (historical fiction) and have not been able to find a physical description of Burns or Harney City (Oregon) around 1890 to 1900. Where can I find a good description of these historical towns?
- Are these still present day towns of Oregon? If so, the town offices may have some historical photographs and such. If not the town's offices then the county offices may have some information and/or photographs. Dismas| 20:21, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Burns, Oregon is located in Harney County, Oregon in the southeastern part of the state. We don't have an article on Harney City but this genealogy site should provide some assistance . This article in the Oregon Blue Book should provide some assistance.
The Harney County Clerk is located at:
- Harney County Oregon Vital Records
- Harney County Clerk
- 450 N Buena Vista Avenue
- Burns, OR 97720
- Phone: (541) 573-6641
Capitalistroadster 07:23, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Cockles and mussels, alive alive o
In the 1970s I saw a made-for-TV (I think) movie in which the above line was featured in singsong. I have been able to determine that the line is from an old Irish folk song. I'd like to know what the title of the movie was. I vaguely remember a lighthouse (makes sense) and Robert Reed (of The Brady Bunch); I checked his filmography on IMDb.com, but found nothing definitive.
- The song is called "Molly Malone": , which might help your search. Incidently, this is known as "Cockles and mussels, Hawaii Five-O" to every schoolkid who was forced to sing it. --Bob Mellish 21:38, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- this Google search gives you all IMDB pages referring to Molly Malone you may find something in that lot. Incidentally, I would imagine the most famous version of the song was by either The Pogues or The Dubliners. --bodnotbod 04:10, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Molly Malone is a traditional Irish folk song. Sinéad O'Connor has done a version and I suspect that most Irish musicians have covered this over the years. Capitalistroadster 07:31, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
politics
How does the liberal constitional phase of 1789-1792 compare with the populist/radical phase of 1792-1794?
- They both occurred in the 18th century. Please do your own homework. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 21:37, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- The French Revolution article would be a good place to start. Capitalistroadster 07:32, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Civil list
I was looking at the civil list article, and was a bit confused. In 1800s Canada, did civil list refer to the "fund" appropriated to pay the salaries? Or was it just a "list" saying where the money went? Thanks. -- pmam21articles 00:57, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- My understanding is that the civil list was originally simply a list of those on the government payroll. Over time the definition broadened, and the civil list became a general term referring to the entire process of selection and payment of these individuals. - SimonP 20:27, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
US presidential felon
I was reading the article about Leonard Peltier and his run for the 2004 presidency. I know that such a thing would probably never happen, but, how would they go about installing someone who is incarcerated as president? Would he do the job from prison, or is he automatically pardoned?
- Furthermore, why can someone who is in prison run for prez, but a prez who commits a crime must be impeached? (I mean a crime they were caught for, not all the crimes committed by past/present presidents that have gone unquestioned). --Ballchef 01:21, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- And one more Q: who are some other criminals that have run for prez (besides dubya) --Ballchef 01:53, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Impeachment is the process by which a president (or judge) may (not "must") be removed from office. It's not a punishment for committing a crime. - Nunh-huh 04:16, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- When a person has not been convicted of any crime, then it is libel to call them a criminal.
- However, in modern politics it is standard to call 100% politicians of political party, other than yours, to be criminals. AlMac| 19:09, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- And one more Q: who are some other criminals that have run for prez (besides dubya) --Ballchef 01:53, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
If I recall correctly US Presidents are above the law; the only body they must be responsible to is the Congress. Once they return to being normal citizens, however, they are subject to regular laws. See articles on Andrew Johnson (aquitted) and Richard Nixon (pardoned). JK
- Since Peltier's convictions were in Federal court, if he were elected president, he would presumably arrange for a judge to swear him in on inauguration day, then immediately pardon himself so he could leave prison and go to the White House. Mumia Abu-Jamal considered a presidential campaign on the Peace and Freedom Party ticket in 2004 as well (the party whose ticket Peltier ran on), but he was convicted in state court, not Federal court -- so if Abu-Jamal were elected president, he wouldn't be able to pardon himself. --Metropolitan90 21:51, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Uses God's divine name
- Glen Milstead? - Nunh-huh 04:13, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Perhaps you want the Tetragrammaton? — Lomn | Talk / RfC 12:43, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
World's largest lorry fleet
I would like to find out which company owns the world's largest lorry fleet.
- If you check the Misplaced Pages reference desk archives, somebody has claimed it's Wal-Mart. --Robert Merkel 06:56, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
what animal did Vasco Da Gama study in Africa in 1497
That's a tough one. The Vasco Da Gama article doesn't specify, and a google search doesn't turn up much either. Perhaps you could look up books devoted to his voyage in a library, or any work written by Da Gama himself. --Ballchef 12:45, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- In 1497 Da Gama was sailing around the southern tip of Africa. So it could have been some sea creature found in the southern waters of africa (for example the Cape Fur Seal) or some land animal spotted on the shore.--Jcw69 17:01, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Please see this previously answered question. Superm401 | Talk 19:08, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Female guerilla fighters
I am working on a piece of creative writing which I hope eventually to turn into a novel. The main premise is that of a young woman who becomes involved with a group of guerilla potential revolutionaries. Obviously there's huge amounts of information on the topic of guerilla warfare, to help with the research this entails, but I'm now looking for something more specific about women involved in guerilla war, both past and present. My personal interest is leaning towards South and Central America, but any information would be useful.
- Phoolan Devi was the name that sprung to mind immediately, although she wasn't South American. KeithD (talk) 12:56, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- There are a couple women associated with Fidel Castro and his Cuban revolution, Anita Marquez and a woman just known as Tania. There have been several movies about Castro, they may be the best source of info on the women. StuRat 22:19, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Where can I find the english Translation of Cyrus' Cylinder?
In October 539 BCE, the Persian king Cyrus took Babylon. In Babylon, he wrote the Cyrus' cylinder. This historical artifact is considered by many to be the first charter of human rights and also the footwork of the UN charter of human rights. In 1971, the UN translated the whole cylinder from Old Persian to all of the languages of the UN. On the internet, I was unable to find the english translation of it. Many websites have only small parts of the English version, but I am looking for the full English translation. If anyone knows where I can find it, I would much appretiate it.
2000 Bush Campaign
Durring George W. Bush's First campaign for the presidency, he was asked by a reporter to names the heads of state of three(I think)countrys. I believe he did not attempt to answer the question but I am not sure. I would like to know the details of this incident. When exactly did this occur? Who was the reporter? What news organization did the reporter represent? What was Bush's response? Hope you can help.
Marshall Dawson
- You can read the CNN article on this at . Bush was asked to name the leaders of four countries: Chechnya, Taiwan, India and Pakistan. He got "Lee" for Taiwan but didn't name any of the others. - SimonP 20:20, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Swansea City career of Frank Lampard
Hello! I wanted to know what tournaments Frank Lampard played in for Swansea City when he was at loan there in 1995-96. He played 9 matches in the Premier League for them, but he also played 2 other matches. What matches were these? Thanks a lot. --Aabha 19:58, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
New Haven and Hartford Connecticut populations
Both New Haven and Hartford are both cited as Connecticut's second-largest city (behind Bridgeport). How could that be?
- Since Misplaced Pages is edited en masse, errors like this can creep in. I would imagine, though, that the problem can be very quickly fixed by checking the populations listed for New Haven, Connecticut and Hartford, Connecticut. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 21:19, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- In this case, Hartford trailed New Haven by about 1,000 people at the 2000 census. However, Hartford's article now has a 2002 estimate (which New Haven's lacks) that places it at about 1,000 more. I would favor re-listing Hartford as third-largest unless evidence is shown to demonstrate that New Haven has an appreciably lower population growth. Any comment from other users? This venue seems more likely to get pageviews than the relevant talk pages. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 21:25, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
when does 1 note have two notes?
Musical terms - when 1 note has two notes? How does this happen? Thanks! --205.188.116.14 22:05, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- You'll need to be a little more descriptive about what you mean. Are you referring to two notes on a single stem? Is there anything like what you are talking about at musical notation? - Nunh-huh 22:20, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- You might be looking for enharmonic notes, like F-sharp and G-flat. Or maybe you mean multiphonics? Mindspillage (spill yours?) 22:44, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- You might mean a Chord (music)? A chord is several notes to be played at the same time, and they are written atop eachother and connected in notation. --W.marsh 23:39, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
The Crucifixion in Art
On a tour to Eastern Europe we noticed that in Crucifixion art the feet of Jesus sonetimes are depicted with one nail and sometimes with two nails. Our guide thought that the convention in Western Europe was two nails and in Eastern Europe one nail. Is this correct-and if so what is the history of the convention? Thank you in advance-- Llobl@aol.com151.201.220.150
massachusetts
I have a school project on massachusetts. i checked google and wikipedia of course.. But there is no specific founder of the state.. so was it the pilgrims in general or is it possible to be more specific? And why was it founded? is that up to me to make up? they were just searching for land, right?? thanks
- You might be interested in our articles on the Massachusetts Bay Company and the Plymouth Company. The idealistic part of your why might be found in City upon a Hill. I think you can get at the economic whys. — Laura Scudder | Talk 02:18, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
Machiavelli vs. Divine Right?
Gimme five differences.
- Okay, fair enough.
- Machiavelli ends with a vowel, while Divine Right doesn't
- Machiavelli has an 'l'.
- Divine Right is two words.
- Machiavelli is a person.
- Machiavelli would support you having others do your homework, while no self-respecting divinity would.
- Do your own homework. Superm401 | Talk 03:12, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
Superm401
Can anybody tell me why Superm401 drinks dog sperm?