| Revision as of 00:25, 1 December 2008 editLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,604 edits →Comments: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:03, 1 December 2008 edit undoKablammo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,410 edits →Article work: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ''']''' As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have '''support'''ed this candidate. ] (]) 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | ''']''' As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have '''support'''ed this candidate. ] (]) 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Article work == | |||
| It is unfortunate that some editors appear to be opposing based on a concern that Casliber's excellent content contributions will diminish if he is elected. While that may be true (and I understand that concern), we all volunteers here, and each of us have the right to choose the areas in which we contribute. We should not seek to limit a volunteer's foray into a new area because of a prospective loss of that editor's contributions in another area. ] (]) 14:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:03, 1 December 2008
Edit Analysis
A detailed breakdown of this candidate's edits in article and Misplaced Pages spaces can be found here. Franamax (talk) 02:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments
LessHeard vanU As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have supported this candidate. LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Article work
It is unfortunate that some editors appear to be opposing based on a concern that Casliber's excellent content contributions will diminish if he is elected. While that may be true (and I understand that concern), we all volunteers here, and each of us have the right to choose the areas in which we contribute. We should not seek to limit a volunteer's foray into a new area because of a prospective loss of that editor's contributions in another area. Kablammo (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)